The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 194 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Nimbus Networks shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 194 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 0 |
After analyzing 194 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while Nimbus Networks users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Nimbus Networks |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Nimbus Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Nimbus Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Nimbus Networks |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Interactive and Nimbus Networks hinges on what specific hotel operational needs you're aiming to address. While Crave offers a dedicated in-room tablet solution designed to enhance guest experience, Nimbus provides a property management system (PMS) that streamlines property-wide tasks. Both serve different functions—so which one aligns best with your hotel’s strategic priorities?
Crave’s in-room tablets focus on elevating the guest journey, whereas Nimbus’s PMS centers on operational efficiency. Are you looking to modernize guest interactions or optimize internal workflows? The answer will clarify the right fit.
Crave Interactive excels at improving guest engagement through in-room tablets that provide instant access to hotel services, local recommendations, and upselling opportunities. Nimbus Networks, on the other hand, is a comprehensive PMS that automates property management, tenant communications, and maintenance requests, with no focus on guest-facing interfaces.
Crave’s deep integrations—over 17 verified partners—and its extensive feature set aim to deliver a seamless hotel guest experience, while Nimbus’s strength lies in operational dashboards and backend automation. Given their distinct purposes, your choice depends on whether your hotel needs more guest-facing technology or internal management tools.
If your hotel’s priority is to increase guest satisfaction and revenue through digital engagement, Crave is the better fit. Its 147 reviews with a 4.6/5 overall rating and recent positive feedback highlight its ease of use, strong support, and flexible customization—making it ideal for luxury hotels, resorts, and boutique properties wanting to impress guests.
If your team needs a platform to streamline daily property management, reduce manual errors, and monitor operational metrics, Nimbus’s PMS could serve you better. However, Nimbus’s review count is zero, and it lacks recent feedback, signaling less proven market presence. For hotels seeking guest engagement, Crave's more recent reviews give it a decisive edge.
Crave’s UI scores a 4.5/5, and recent reviews praise its intuitive design that guests find easy to navigate. The onboarding process is rated at 4.37/5, with hotel staff describing the setup as straightforward and quick to adopt. Users note that guests appreciate the clear, responsive interface, which enhances overall satisfaction.
Nimbus, lacking available review data, cannot be directly compared. Given Crave’s high usability ratings and recent positive feedback, it clearly offers a more user-friendly experience for both staff and guests.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s feature set exceeds 55 unique functionalities, including digital directories, multi-lingual support, payments, room service ordering, guest messaging, web-app access, QR codes, digital menus, and in-room controls. It also supports upselling, local recommendations, and integrations with POS and PMS systems—covering a broad range of guest needs.
Nimbus offers no specific features listed or unique capabilities, focusing instead on core property management tasks. Crave’s extensive feature library and integrations clearly outweigh Nimbus’s limited profile.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support ratings are high, with a score of 4.6/5 and recent reviews emphasizing responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive assistance. Hoteliers describe the support team as diligent and capable—crucial for timely content updates and troubleshooting.
Nimbus has no available reviews or feedback on support, making it impossible to assess its service quality. Given Crave’s proven support record, it strongly outperforms Nimbus in this area.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including notable systems like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, Book4Time, and Quore, enabling extensive operational and guest experience connectivity. Nimbus, with zero listed integrations, offers no proven third-party connections.
Crave’s rich integration ecosystem ensures your hotel can connect various systems—channel managers, POS, PMS, and more—streamlining operations and improving data consistency. Nimbus’s lack of integrations limits its ability to support complex hotel ecosystems.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s average rating of 4.6/5 from 147 reviews—primarily recent—reflects high satisfaction among property managers and guests. Hotels across segments like independent, boutique, and luxury properties rate Crave favorably, with some reviewers calling it a “game-changer” for guest engagement.
Nimbus has no reviews, so no rating data exists. Its absence of feedback indicates less proven market trust and adoption. Crave’s review volume and recency make it the clearer leader.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing is listed at a flat $1,200 implementation fee, with no mention of monthly charges or freemium models. Nimbus’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be custom or on request, typical for enterprise PMS solutions.
Given the transparent pricing and the lack of cost data for Nimbus, Crave offers a straightforward financial comparison. The flat fee structure simplifies budgeting for your hotel’s digital guest experience.
Not ideal if you’re a budget property or hotel with minimal guest-facing technology needs. Crave’s investment may be less justifiable for small or simple operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if you’re looking for a guest-facing solution or in-room tablets, as Nimbus doesn’t focus on guest engagement.
Not ideal if:
Crave Interactive is a well-reviewed in-room tablet solution with a proven track record, high user satisfaction, and extensive features designed to boost guest engagement and revenue. Its 147 recent reviews and 4.6/5 score showcase its market trust and ongoing support.
Nimbus Networks, lacking review data and with no listed features or integrations, appears more geared toward internal property management rather than guest-facing services. Its absence of recent feedback makes it a less compelling choice for hotels prioritizing guest experience.
Choose Crave if your goal is to impress guests, increase ancillary revenue, and modernize in-room interactions. Opt for Nimbus if your focus is on automating property operations and managing multiple properties efficiently, but be aware of the limited publicly available data.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported guest engagement platform with proven results, Crave is the clear choice. Nimbus may serve niche property management needs but currently lacks the market presence and user feedback to rival Crave’s comprehensive offering.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Nimbus Networks | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Nimbus share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Nimbus Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Digital directory | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 43 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Nimbus share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while Nimbus offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Interactive (Tablets) leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. Nimbus: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and Nimbus Networks has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor