The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Opera shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 209 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, Opera users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Opera |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing between Opera by Opera and RoomRaccoon PMS hinges on your hotel’s needs, size, and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management but approach this goal very differently—Opera offers a traditional, enterprise-grade platform, while RoomRaccoon emphasizes an all-in-one, cloud-based experience tailored for small to mid-sized hotels. Your decision should consider user reviews, feature depth, ease of use, and support quality.
Opera is a legacy system with a long history in the industry, but it currently has no recent reviews or star ratings, raising questions about ongoing support and development. RoomRaccoon, in contrast, boasts over 169 recent reviews and an impressive 4.88/5 rating, making it the more proven choice based on current user feedback. Are you ready for a more modern, user-rated PMS experience?
Opera and RoomRaccoon are both designed to improve hotel operational efficiency, but their scope and target markets differ substantially. Opera, historically favored by large hotel chains and enterprise properties, offers a broad set of features meant for complex, multi-property management. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, appeals mainly to independent hotels, boutique properties, and small chains seeking simplicity and automation.
Opera’s lack of recent reviews and a zero-star rating suggest it’s not keeping pace with modern hotel technology, especially for smaller hotels. RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews, with an average 4.88/5 and a 94% likelihood to recommend, reflect high current customer satisfaction, particularly for independent operators. Do you need a robust enterprise system or a straightforward, scalable cloud solution?
If your hotel is a small to medium-sized independent property looking for a flexible, easy-to-use PMS with integrated booking, channel management, and automation, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. It’s especially beneficial if you prioritize automation tools like guest communication, dynamic pricing, and online check-in, which significantly boost revenue and guest satisfaction.
Conversely, if your hotel is part of a large chain or requires a complex management suite capable of handling multiple properties at a granular level, Opera’s traditional enterprise infrastructure might seem suitable—though its current lack of recent reviews and support clarity make this less certain. For most independent hotels, RoomRaccoon's modern, all-in-one approach is the more practical solution.
RoomRaccoon is highly rated for usability, with a 4.74/5 score and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and friendly customer support. Users frequently mention how quickly staff can learn and adopt the system, leading to smoother daily operations.
Opera, however, scores a 0/5 in ease of use, based on its outdated interface and the absence of recent user feedback. Given its legacy status, it likely requires significant staff training and may be less adaptable to modern workflows. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers over 51 features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, integrated payments, mobile app, guest CRM, automated night audit, and more—features that make it an all-in-one platform for small hotels. Opera’s feature list appears limited, with no unique modules demonstrated or detailed, suggesting it might lack the modern automation and integration capabilities.
RoomRaccoon’s extensive feature set enables streamlined management from reservations to revenue optimization in one platform, whereas Opera’s offerings seem minimal and possibly outdated. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support scores at 4.53/5, with recent reviews highlighting helpful, responsive service that aids smooth onboarding and problem resolution. Users mention how the support team actively incorporates feedback and enhances the platform, fostering confidence in ongoing assistance.
Opera has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it difficult to assess. Historically, legacy systems often struggle with support responsiveness, especially for smaller clients. Given RoomRaccoon’s clear recent positive feedback, it’s the safer bet. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon clearly leads with 88 verified integrations, including popular hospitality solutions like Sage, Flexipass, Becurious, and Paxxio, alongside its own booking engine and channel manager. It supports seamless, two-way real-time integrations that automate operations and reduce manual work.
Opera shows zero verified partners, indicating limited or no current integration capabilities, which could hinder operational flexibility. For hotels relying on a robust tech ecosystem, RoomRaccoon’s extensive integration options provide a significant advantage. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews reflect a 4.88/5 rating, with a 94% likelihood to recommend, especially among boutique, independent, and small hotel segments. Users praise its ease of use, automation, and ability to increase bookings and revenue, with some reporting up to a 331% RevPAR boost.
Opera’s lack of recent reviews and ratings makes it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction, but the absence suggests it isn’t actively rated or supported today. For current hoteliers, RoomRaccoon clearly scores higher. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Opera does not publicly disclose pricing, but historically, enterprise systems like Opera often involve custom quotes, implementation fees, and higher ongoing costs. RoomRaccoon charges a flat base fee of $1,000 per month, with no hidden fees or additional costs for features.
Given the transparent pricing and affordable entry point, RoomRaccoon is more accessible for small hotels and independents. Without clear Opera pricing, RoomRaccoon’s straightforward model is easier to budget. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or values modern, cloud-based solutions with quick onboarding.
Not ideal if you require highly specialized, multi-property enterprise features or have complex, multi-layered operational needs.
Opera represents a traditional, enterprise-managed PMS suited for large chains with complex needs. Its current lack of recent reviews and user feedback suggests it’s not actively evolving or suited for the modern independent hotel.
RoomRaccoon, with over 169 recent reviews and a near-perfect rating, clearly stands out as the preferred choice for independent and boutique properties. Its extensive features, ease of use, and strong support network make it the more reliable, modern solution today.
If your hotel is small, independent, or seeking a straightforward, integrated management system, RoomRaccoon is the clear winner. For large chains needing custom solutions, Opera might still be relevant—but only if you verify its current support and feature set.
In conclusion, for most hotels actively seeking a modern, well-reviewed, and feature-rich PMS, RoomRaccoon is the safer bet. It offers the tools and support to help your team operate more efficiently and increase revenue without the complexity and uncertainty associated with legacy systems like Opera.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Opera |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Opera and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Opera |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Opera and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Opera offers 0 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Opera: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Opera has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor