The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Passepartout shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while Passepartout users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Passepartout boils down to your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds offers a full suite of features tailored for hospitality environments, while Passepartout provides a property management focus with AI-driven insights. But which platform truly supports your hotel’s trajectory?
Cloudbeds excels in large-scale, multi-property management with extensive integrations, whereas Passepartout appeals to smaller portfolios seeking simplicity and AI-based property insights. Are you ready to dive into a detailed comparison?
Cloudbeds and Passepartout are both property management systems, but they serve different scopes. Cloudbeds consolidates operations, distribution, and revenue management into one platform, making it ideal for hotels looking to scale or with complex needs. Passepartout offers a streamlined property management experience focused on individual or small portfolios, emphasizing tenant feedback and property performance insights through AI.
While Cloudbeds boasts a broad feature set and a global presence, Passepartout's strength lies in its simplicity and AI-driven property analytics. Do you need a flexible, scalable system or a straightforward platform with AI-powered insights?
If your hotel needs to manage multiple properties, integrate with over 190 partners, and automate workflows across operations, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. Its 1071 reviews and recent 81 reviews in the last six months with a 4.63/5 rating make it the more proven option for larger or growing hotels.
Conversely, if your hotel operates a small portfolio or a single property and values AI-driven feedback summaries for tenant or guest satisfaction, Passepartout might be appealing. However, with zero reviews or ratings, it lacks the recent, real-world validation that Cloudbeds offers.
Cloudbeds scores a 4.61/5 for ease of use, backed by a user-friendly interface, onboarding at 4.45/5, and positive reviews highlighting its straightforward navigation. Many users appreciate how staff can quickly adapt, reducing the learning curve.
Passepartout provides a simplified interface with a focus on property analytics, but with no recent reviews or user feedback available, it’s impossible to compare usability confidently. Based on available data, Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers an extensive library of 64 unique features, including channel management, real-time integrations, revenue management, and a customizable booking engine. These enable full operational control, guest communication, and automation.
Passepartout's feature set appears less comprehensive, with no listed features beyond basic property management and AI feedback summaries. With 64 features in Cloudbeds, the edge clearly goes to Cloudbeds for feature richness and versatility.
Cloudbeds maintains a 4.41/5 support rating, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and support team. Users often comment on quick assistance and helpful onboarding, which contribute to smoother operations.
Passepartout has no publicly available reviews or support ratings, making comparison impossible. Given Cloudbeds’s established reputation, edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has verified partnerships with 190 vendors, including major OTAs, payment systems, and third-party apps. This extensive network simplifies adding new tools and automating workflows.
Passepartout has zero listed integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems. For a hotel with existing tech stacks or plans for growth, Cloudbeds’s integration ecosystem provides a significant advantage.
Cloudbeds’s recent reviews show a 4.63/5 rating with 91% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong satisfaction across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties. Hotels and hostels frequently cite ease of use, support, and revenue growth as key benefits.
Passepartout has no reviews or recent ratings, so it cannot be rated. Based on available data, edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $600/month with no trial or freemium options currently. Pricing details for Passepartout are not available, which suggests it may not be transparent or might be tailored on a case-by-case basis.
Given Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing structure, it offers clarity for budget planning. Passepartout's pricing remains undefined, limiting direct comparison.
Not ideal if your hotel has a very small portfolio with minimal distribution needs or prefers a lightweight system.
Not ideal if your hotel needs comprehensive automation, global integrations, or multi-property management.
Cloudbeds and Passepartout serve different hotel management needs. Cloudbeds is a robust, scalable platform, backed by over 1071 reviews and recent positive feedback, making it suitable for hotels aiming to grow or manage complex operations.
Passepartout, with no recent reviews or concrete features, appears more suited to small, simple properties or tenants prioritizing AI feedback. Its lack of recent validation makes it less compelling for hotels seeking proven, comprehensive solutions.
When to choose Cloudbeds:
When to choose Passepartout:
Final verdict:
For most hotels, especially those with plans for growth, Cloudbeds offers a proven, comprehensive platform supported by extensive recent reviews and a strong support network. Passepartout remains unvalidated at this point, making Cloudbeds the safer, more reliable choice for ambitious hoteliers.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Passepartout | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and Passepartout share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Passepartout |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and Passepartout share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while Passepartout offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. Passepartout: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and Passepartout has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor