The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Payfast shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, Payfast users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Payfast |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Payfast |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Payfast |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Payfast |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
Choosing between Payfast by Network and ROH hinges on understanding what each offers to your hotel’s payment processing needs. Payfast is virtually nonexistent in terms of reviews, features, and market presence, while ROH is an established platform with a high user rating and proven track record. Both aim to facilitate hotel payments, but their capabilities, usability, and market adoption differ significantly.
Your team needs a solution that aligns with your operational complexity and growth plans. Do you prefer a platform with a comprehensive feature set and proven support, or are you looking for a no-frills, basic payment gateway? Let’s explore which product better suits your hotel.
Given that Payfast has no reviews, features, or recent data, it’s impossible to validate its performance or support quality. ROH, on the other hand, boasts over 65 reviews, a 100/100 HT Score, and a 4.97/5 support rating, making it a significantly more reliable choice. While Payfast may seem attractive due to an absence of cost, the lack of proven functionality and customer feedback raises red flags.
ROH’s high NPS score (9.91/5) and recent reviews underscore its effectiveness and user satisfaction, especially in automating payments, invoicing, and cash flow management. Would you risk your payment processes on a product with no proven track record?
If your hotel needs a robust, feature-rich payments platform that automates invoicing, supports multiple payment methods, and integrates seamlessly with other systems, ROH is the clear choice. It is designed specifically for hospitality, with 19 unique features including refund management, recurring payments, and payment splitting.
If you simply require a basic payment gateway without advanced automation or integrations, and if cost is a primary concern, Payfast’s lack of features and support makes it unsuitable. ROH’s comprehensive capabilities and recent positive reviews make it the better investment for hotels looking to upgrade their financial infrastructure.
ROH’s user ratings speak volumes: it scores 4.95/5 for ease of use, with multiple reviews praising its intuitive interface. Hotel staff find it straightforward on both the hotel and client sides, with no questions or confusion reported.
Payfast’s lack of data and reviews mean we cannot assess its usability, but its absence from recent review activity suggests it lacks the validation and refinement that ROH offers. Based on available evidence, ROH is the easier, more proven platform to adopt.
ROH outstrips Payfast dramatically, offering 19 features that facilitate comprehensive payment management—such as refund handling, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, and support for multiple card types. Payfast, by contrast, offers zero features, indicating a minimal or non-existent product.
If your hotel requires functionalities like recurring payments, chargeback management, or PCI compliance, ROH provides these out of the box, making it a future-proof choice. Edge: ROH.
ROH’s customer support is rated 4.97/5, with reviews emphasizing easy onboarding, ongoing support, and effective communication. It was praised for making the setup process smooth and support staff being “great” and “very helpful.”
Payfast’s support data is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, it’s impossible to verify its support quality. Given ROH’s high support ratings and recent review activity, it’s clearly the more reliable choice for your hotel’s payment needs. Edge: ROH.
Both platforms have only one verified integration: Payfast with Yanolja Cloud Solutions, and ROH with Oracle Hospitality. Neither platform boasts a broad ecosystem of integrations, but ROH’s partnership with Oracle Hospitality indicates a focus on hotel-specific systems.
If you need a platform that can connect with your existing property management system, ROH’s association with Oracle is promising. However, with only one verified partner for each, neither stands out in this area. Edge: ROH, due to its industry-specific partnership.
ROH’s reviews, totaling 65, show a consistent pattern of high satisfaction, especially among luxury hotels, resorts, and branded properties. It’s rated 4.95/5 for ease of use and 4.97/5 for support, with recent reviews emphasizing its user-friendliness.
Payfast has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess hotel sentiment. Given the recent review activity and high ratings for ROH, hoteliers clearly favor this platform. Edge: ROH.
Payfast’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a trial or transparent fee structure. ROH charges $100 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or additional costs.
For a known investment, ROH’s clear pricing provides transparency, allowing your hotel to budget accordingly. Payfast’s opaque pricing makes it difficult to evaluate value — but given its lack of features and reviews, ROH’s straightforward fee structure is more reliable. Edge: ROH.
Hotels that need only a basic, no-frills payment gateway without automation or advanced features might consider Payfast, especially if cost is their primary concern. It could serve small properties or those just starting to explore digital payments.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Given the lack of features and support, Payfast is not recommended for most hotels seeking efficiency.
Hotels that want a comprehensive, scalable payments platform should turn to ROH. Its features support luxury resorts, branded hotels, conference centers, and properties looking to automate and streamline their financial operations.
Not ideal if your hotel:
ROH is best suited for hotels aiming to modernize their financial infrastructure and improve operational efficiency.
ROH stands out as the more established, feature-rich, and trusted payments platform. Its high user ratings, recent reviews, and proven performance across multiple hotel segments make it the clear choice for hotels seeking an effective payment solution.
If your hotel requires advanced automation, diverse payment options, and reliable support, ROH’s $100/month fee is a small price for the value delivered. Conversely, Payfast’s lack of reviews, features, and recent activity makes it too risky for hotels looking to grow or improve their payment processes.
In summary, for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and future-proofing, ROH is the definitive option. If you’re simply testing the waters or operating a tiny property with minimal needs, consider your options carefully before choosing Payfast.
According to HTR's product database, Payfast by Network and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Payfast |
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Payfast by Network and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Payfast by Network offers 1 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Payfast by Network: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Payfast has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor