The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Persefone shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 887 | 0 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Mews users most value its ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, while Persefone users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 329 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 397 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 45 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #3 49 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 220 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 170 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 130 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 106 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #10 17 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #28 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS by Mews and Persefone by Persefone hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews excels in automation, integrations, and user experience, while Persefone offers a more traditional, all-in-one platform with a strong Italian legacy. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s current stage and future plans?
Mews is a cloud-native property management system with a high user rating of 4.62/5 from 758 reviews, emphasizing ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations. Persefone, with over 17 years in the market and more than 3,000 hotels served, is a European-based system renowned for its comprehensive suite of features and reliable support but has no publicly available recent reviews or ratings. Does your hotel prioritize innovative technology and a broad ecosystem, or do you prefer a proven, integrated package with long-term stability?
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a modern, flexible platform favored by boutique, hostel, and city-center hotels, whereas Persefone’s reputation is built on stability and a full set of features, mostly appreciated by Italian hotels. Are you seeking a cutting-edge, scalable system or a tried-and-true solution with deep local expertise?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, go with Mews. Its recent review count and ratings demonstrate active adoption and ongoing improvements, making it ideal for hotels aiming to modernize operations quickly.
If your hotel prefers a traditional, all-in-one software suite with extensive features designed for the Italian market, Persefone might suit your needs better. Its long-standing presence and integrated approach appeal to hotels that value stability and a comprehensive management tool, especially if they operate primarily in Italy or similar markets.
For fast-growing hotels seeking agility, Mews’s open API, marketplace, and rapid innovation are unmatched. Conversely, if you prioritize a fully integrated, regional solution with a history of serving thousands of hotels, Persefone’s deep feature set and support may be advantageous.
Mews boasts a user rating of 4.7/5 for ease of use across 679 reviews, with many hoteliers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and modern design. Recent feedback highlights its simple reservation dashboards, guest messaging, and remote access, supporting staff of all tech skill levels.
Persefone has not publicly shared a recent ease-of-use rating or detailed user feedback, but its long history suggests a traditional, feature-rich interface that may require more training and adaptation, especially for staff unfamiliar with legacy systems. Is your team ready for a modern, user-centric platform or better served by a familiar, all-in-one interface?
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 49 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, automated night audit, guest app, real-time reporting, shift planning, and more. Its broad suite is designed to improve operational agility and guest engagement.
Persefone, on the other hand, consolidates all functionalities into a single web solution, but specific feature counts or unique functionalities are not publicly detailed. It likely includes core hotel management features but lacks the extensive optional modules and customization that Mews provides.
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a support rating of 4.27/5 from 758 recent reviews, with users often citing quick, helpful responses and effective onboarding, though some report occasional bugs that are resolved swiftly. Its large global team offers 24/7 support, aiding in onboarding and ongoing troubleshooting.
Persefone emphasizes serious technical support, stemming from its 17-year history, but it has no recent review data to gauge current support quality. Its support is reputed to be reliable, especially within Italy, but recent user feedback is unavailable for comparison.
Edge: Mews.
Mews's ecosystem surpasses 336 verified partners, including channel managers, payment providers, CRMs, and more, with a vibrant marketplace enabling rapid integration of third-party tools. This vast network allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack with ease.
Persefone offers a fully integrated solution but has no publicly available data on third-party integrations or a marketplace. Its ecosystem is likely more closed, emphasizing stability over flexibility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.62/5 by 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its user-friendliness, automation, and excellent support, especially among boutique and city hotels. The high review count and recency indicate a vibrant, satisfied user base.
Persefone has no recent reviews or ratings published publicly, limiting the ability to gauge user satisfaction today. Its longstanding reputation suggests reliability, but it lacks current data to compare.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, reflecting its enterprise-level automation and extensive features, with no free tier or trial. Persefone’s pricing is listed at $200 per month, offering a more affordable but less detailed view of its pricing structure, which may include custom quotes for larger hotels.
While Mews’s higher price is justified by its advanced capabilities, Persefone’s lower cost could appeal to smaller or budget-conscious properties. Do your operational needs justify the investment in Mews’s wider capabilities?
Not ideal if your hotel primarily operates in Italy and prefers a traditional, locally supported system with deep regional customization.
Not ideal if your hotel seeks rapid innovation, cloud-native features, or extensive third-party ecosystems.
Mews is a modern, cloud-native PMS with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest experience, supported by a large, active user base that reviews and updates regularly. Its extensive features and marketplace make it a flexible choice for hotels aiming to innovate and scale quickly.
Persefone offers a mature, comprehensive system rooted in Italy, with a focus on stability and all-in-one management, but lacks recent public reviews or a visible ecosystem of integrations. It’s better suited for hotels seeking a regional, stable platform rather than cutting-edge technology.
Choose Mews if your hotel values agility, automation, and a broad ecosystem, especially if you're planning to grow or modernize rapidly. Opt for Persefone if you prefer a long-established, regional solution with a focus on stability and deep feature integration, particularly within the Italian market.
According to HTR's product database, Mews PMS and Persefone share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Custom rates | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Mews PMS and Persefone share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Mews PMS offers 335 verified integration partners, while Persefone offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Mews PMS: No. Persefone: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Mews has an HT Score of 100 and Persefone has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor