The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 370 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Persefone shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 370 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 370 |
After analyzing 370 verified reviews, Persefone users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing between Persefone by Persefone and Stayntouch by Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s operational priorities, budget, and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence.
Persefone, with its long-standing presence in Italy and a focus on integrated solutions, appeals to hotels seeking a consolidated platform. Stayntouch, on the other hand, with a broader global footprint and extensive third-party integrations, caters to hotels aiming for flexibility and scalability.
Are you leaning towards a more localized, all-in-one solution, or do you require a system with extensive integrations and multi-property management? Let’s explore which product better fits your hotel’s needs.
Persefone offers a comprehensive hotel management system rooted in over 17 years of development, primarily serving European markets. It emphasizes ease of use and integrated features, but it lacks the extensive third-party integrations and market presence of Stayntouch.
Stayntouch is a cloud-based platform with a strong North American and global footprint, boasting more recent and numerous reviews—26 in the last six months compared to none for Persefone. It is praised for its mobile-friendly design, intuitive interface, and broad feature set.
Given the review count and recent positive feedback, Stayntouch’s reliability and support are more convincingly proven. Its feature depth and integration ecosystem make it a compelling choice, especially for hotels focused on scalability.
Which software aligns better with your hotel’s growth trajectory and regional focus?
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS with extensive third-party integration, proven user satisfaction, and a global presence, go with Stayntouch. It’s particularly suited for hotels wanting multi-property management, mobile check-in capabilities, and advanced revenue tools.
Choose Persefone if your hotel operates primarily in Italy or Europe, values a fully integrated system with a long track record, and prefers a fixed, potentially more cost-effective solution. Persefone’s lack of recent reviews and integrations limits its appeal for growth-oriented properties.
For hotels with a focus on international expansion, multi-property operations, or a need for a broad feature set, Stayntouch’s recent reviews and higher ratings clearly favor it.
Stayntouch’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.7/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and friendly staff support. Guests and staff highlight the platform’s mobile adaptability and straightforward design, making daily operations smoother.
Persefone, with a 0/5 rating in ease of use, offers little recent review data to support its user-friendliness. Its long history suggests a potentially steeper learning curve, particularly for staff accustomed to more modern, cloud-based interfaces.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch provides a feature-rich platform with 39 exclusive functions, including revenue management, guest profiles, online check-in/out, digital registration, and integrated payment processing. It supports real-time reporting, group handling, and extensive automation.
Persefone, with no unique features reported beyond its core system, lacks the breadth of tools offered by Stayntouch. Its limited feature set and absence of integrations make it less suitable for properties seeking advanced operational capabilities.
The clear advantage goes to Stayntouch, offering a comprehensive suite that covers most hotel management needs.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support ratings are high at 4.68/5, with recent reviews praising efficient onboarding, helpful support staff, and quick issue resolution. Guest feedback underscores the quality of their training and support, which enhances user confidence.
Persefone’s support data is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, its support quality cannot be confidently assessed. Its long history suggests foundational support, but it does not match Stayntouch’s current customer service reputation.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified third-party integrations, including popular systems like RoomPriceGenie and STAAH, which facilitate revenue optimization and distribution. It seamlessly connects with various guest management, revenue, and financial tools, making it suitable for complex hotel portfolios.
Persefone, with no verified partnerships, offers no integrations beyond its core platform, limiting flexibility and adaptability for hotels needing extensive third-party connections.
For scalability and a broad tech ecosystem, Stayntouch’s integrations are unmatched.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s recent reviews, with an NPS score of 9.35/10 and 94% likelihood to recommend, reflect high hotel satisfaction, especially in North America and Europe. Hotels praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, particularly in boutique and branded segments.
Persefone lacks recent reviews and ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. Its older user base and limited feedback suggest lower confidence in its contemporary performance.
For current, positive hotel ratings, Stayntouch is the clear leader.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Persefone’s pricing is listed at $200/month, with no trial, freemium, or implementation fees, indicating a straightforward, potentially cost-effective solution. However, its limited feature set and lack of recent reviews raise questions about value.
Stayntouch costs $800/month without a trial or implementation fee, reflecting its extensive features, integrations, and support. Its higher price aligns with its broader capabilities and market reputation.
If budget is a key concern, Persefone’s lower price might be attractive, but for value derived from features and support, Stayntouch justifies the higher investment.
Not ideal if your hotel is expanding regionally or globally, needs extensive automation, or relies on third-party integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel operates primarily in Italy with limited growth plans or prefers on-premise solutions.
The core difference lies in their market presence and feature sets: Persefone is a longstanding, integrated solution primarily suited for European hotels with simpler needs, while Stayntouch offers a modern, scalable platform with extensive integrations and broad international reach.
If your hotel values a proven, fixed-cost solution with a European focus, Persefone may suffice. But for hotels seeking a highly rated, flexible, and feature-rich platform capable of supporting growth, Stayntouch is the stronger choice.
Choose Persefone if your hotel is regional and has minimal integration needs. Opt for Stayntouch if scalability, recent reviews, and a comprehensive feature set are priorities.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming to grow and optimize operations, Stayntouch's recent reviews, higher ratings, and extensive capabilities make it the recommended solution.
This comparative guide should help your team make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s operational goals and growth plans.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Persefone and Stayntouch share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Group functionality | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Persefone and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Persefone offers 0 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Persefone: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Persefone has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor