The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Softstar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 108 | 0 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Planet users most value its functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management, while Softstar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #27 32 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 50 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #15 10 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #17 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #21 42 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #21 34 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #17 33 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #20 9 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #29 6 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #10 79 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #15 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between protel PMS and Softstar hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth plans. While both aim to streamline property management, they serve vastly different markets and hotel profiles. protel PMS is a globally recognized platform with extensive features and a large user base, whereas Softstar targets niche property management, particularly rental and multi-unit operations. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, growth ambitions, and integration requirements.
With over 105 recent reviews and a 4.11/5 overall rating, protel PMS is a well-established choice for hotels seeking a comprehensive management system. Softstar, meanwhile, has no reviews on record, making it impossible to gauge its effectiveness or support quality. For hoteliers prioritizing vendor credibility and recent user feedback, protel is the safer, more data-backed option.
protel PMS offers a full-stack, cloud-native platform designed for diverse hotel types, from independent boutique hotels to large resorts. It provides a broad range of features—including integrated payments, multi-currency support, booking engine, and extensive third-party integrations—making it suitable for hotels with complex operational needs.
Softstar, by contrast, is tailored toward rental properties and property managers handling multiple units, focusing on automation and AI-driven insights. However, with no recent reviews or verified customer feedback, assessing its reliability or suitability for larger or multi-faceted hotels is challenging.
protel’s ongoing development and large integration ecosystem—over 1,200 verified partners—make it a choice for hotels emphasizing connectivity and scalability. Softstar’s niche focus on property automation suggests it’s better suited for property managers rather than full-service hotels seeking a comprehensive PMS.
Do you need a flexible, scalable PMS with proven industry success, or a specialized platform for rental management?
If your hotel needs a robust, full-featured PMS that supports multi-property management, extensive integrations, and operational automation, go with protel PMS. It is ideal for hotels that want proven reliability, a large support network, and ongoing feature updates.
If your hotel manages rental units, vacation properties, or smaller operations focused on automation and AI-driven insights, Softstar might be a fit—though the lack of recent reviews makes this uncertain. Its niche orientation could limit scalability for larger hotels or those requiring complex integrations.
For hotels prioritizing a mature, well-reviewed platform with broad industry adoption, protel is the clear choice. For property managers with a focus on automation and tenant tracking, Softstar’s approach could appeal, but more concrete feedback is needed to confirm its value.
protel PMS scores a 4.12/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface, streamlined workflows, and straightforward onboarding process. Support reviews mention some delays but overall indicate a user-friendly experience, especially for those familiar with PMS systems.
Softstar, lacking recent reviews and user feedback, offers no clear data on usability or onboarding. Its AI automation features suggest a focus on efficiency, but without verified user experiences, its ease of use remains unverified.
Edge: protel PMS.
protel PMS boasts over 46 exclusive features, including a booking engine, multi-currency management, integrated payment processing, guest profiles, housekeping modules, and real-time reporting. Its extensive integration ecosystem (195 verified partners) further enhances its functionality.
Softstar, by comparison, offers AI-driven property management, tenant tracking, maintenance scheduling, and financial reporting tailored to rental operations. However, it has no verified features or integrations comparable to protel’s expansive suite.
Edge: protel PMS.
protel PMS has a customer support rating of 3.95/5, with reviews noting helpful, friendly support, but also occasional delays in response times. Support availability includes 24/7 assistance and multilingual specialists, which is a significant advantage.
Softstar’s support quality remains unverified, with no recent or detailed reviews to assess responsiveness or overall service quality. This lack of feedback makes it difficult to determine which vendor offers more reliable support.
Edge: protel PMS.
protel PMS integrates with over 195 verified partners, including major brands like Innspire, Right Revenue, Omnibees, and RevControl. Its broad ecosystem facilitates connecting with revenue management, CRM, channel managers, and payment providers, enabling a connected hotel operation.
Softstar offers no verified integrations or partner list, suggesting limited or no third-party connectivity. For hotels relying on multiple systems, this is a significant shortcoming.
Edge: protel PMS.
While protel PMS has a substantial review base, Softstar has no reviews to evaluate user satisfaction. Among hotels that have reviewed protel, the average rating is 4.11/5, with independent hotels rating it slightly higher (4.5/5). Recent reviews are positive, emphasizing reliability, feature set, and support.
Without data, Softstar cannot be confidently rated. Hotel ratings are a critical factor in decision-making, favoring protel’s transparent, recent feedback.
Edge: protel PMS.
protel PMS charges a base price of $500 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options. It does not offer a freemium model or monthly per-room charges, making its pricing straightforward.
Softstar’s pricing details are unavailable, and no trial information is provided. Its lack of transparency could be a concern for hotels trying to evaluate ROI before committing.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, has minimal tech needs, or prefers a simple, budget-friendly solution.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a full-service PMS with extensive integrations, multi-property management, or complex guest service tools.
protel PMS stands out as a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform with a proven track record across diverse hotel types. Its vast feature set, extensive integrations, and recent positive feedback make it a clear choice for hotels seeking reliability and scalability.
Softstar offers a specialized solution centered on automation and tenant management, but the absence of recent reviews or verified user feedback makes its effectiveness uncertain. For most hotels, especially those aiming for growth and operational efficiency, protel PMS is the more dependable option.
If your hotel values a tried-and-true PMS capable of handling complex operations and integrating with your existing tech stack, choose protel PMS. Its large support network, ongoing development, and extensive feature list make it the safest, most strategic investment.
However, if your focus is on managing rental units or properties with a primary emphasis on automation, and you can verify Softstar’s capabilities, it may be worth exploring further—though caution is advised due to the lack of recent reviews.
According to HTR's product database, protel PMS (by Planet) and Softstar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. protel PMS (by Planet) and Softstar share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194 verified integration partners, while Softstar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
protel PMS (by Planet): No. Softstar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Planet has an HT Score of 33 and Softstar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor