The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 886 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Rentlio shines , with exclusive features like On premise.
Side-by-side ratings based on 886 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $1,500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 886 | 0 |
After analyzing 886 verified reviews, Mews users most value its customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, onboarding and support experience, while Rentlio users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing Complexity and Reporting Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing and Fees
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 329 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 397 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 45 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #3 49 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 220 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 170 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 130 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 106 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #10 17 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #28 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Rentlio involves weighing a product with extensive reviews and proven performance against a less-reviewed but potentially simpler alternative. Mews, with over 750 reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, offers a comprehensive cloud-based system designed to boost operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Rentlio, while promising, currently lacks review data and user feedback, making it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Mews and Rentlio aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity and feature breadth. Mews offers a broad suite of functionalities, over 336 integrations, and a robust ecosystem, while Rentlio’s capabilities are more limited, with only 11 verified partners. Mews’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, extensive automation, and high user satisfaction, whereas Rentlio’s lack of recent reviews leaves its effectiveness unverified.
Given Mews’s proven track record, large user base, and ongoing support, it better addresses the needs of hotels seeking a dependable, scalable PMS. Rentlio’s limited review presence suggests it may still be evolving, and its actual performance in complex hotel environments remains untested. Are you comfortable taking a risk on a less-reviewed product?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich system that supports multi-property management, automation, and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its proven track record, high review count, and recent positive feedback demonstrate it can meet diverse operational needs. If, however, your hotel or management team is looking for a budget-friendly, straightforward solution and is willing to accept limited proven capabilities, Rentlio might seem appealing—but its lack of recent data makes this uncertain.
For hotels that prioritize scalability, automation, and extensive third-party integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Rentlio may appeal to smaller or less complex operations, but without current reviews, its reliability and feature set remain unverified.
Mews’s ease of use is well-documented, with a 4.7/5 ratings based on 758 reviews and recent feedback from hotels praising its intuitive, modern interface. Users highlight its quick onboarding, simple reservation dashboards, and user-friendly mobile and tablet apps. Rentlio’s current review data is nonexistent, so its usability remains an untested variable.
Given the extensive positive feedback and high ratings, Mews’s interface is designed for straightforward adoption by staff at all levels. Rentlio’s ease of use cannot be confidently assessed at this time; without reviews or user feedback, it’s challenging to determine whether it simplifies or complicates daily operations.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 35 shared features with Rentlio but surpasses it with 24 unique capabilities. These include multi-lingual support, multi-currency management, guest CRM, integrated CRS, guest messaging, digital registration, kiosk check-in, automated space optimization, employee shift planning, and PCI compliance, among others. Rentlio’s only exclusive feature is on-premise deployment, which limits cloud-based flexibility.
Mews’s extensive feature set caters to diverse hotel types, from boutique to large-scale properties, with advanced automation and guest engagement tools. Rentlio’s narrower feature scope and lack of recent updates may restrict its utility for modern, tech-driven hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings stand at 4.27/5, based on numerous recent reviews praising its responsiveness, onboarding assistance, and proactive problem-solving. Users often mention that Mews’s support team sets a high standard, with some noting occasional bugs but rapid resolution. Rentlio’s support data isn’t available, making it impossible to compare support quality or responsiveness.
Given Mews’s proven support performance and recent positive reviews, your team can expect reliable assistance. Rentlio’s lack of recent support ratings suggests uncertainty about its post-sale service quality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a verified network of 336 partners, including popular integrations like Stripe, PriceLabs, Criton, and many others, supporting extensive customization. Rentlio has only 11 verified partners, with just 10 shared with Mews, and a single unique partner, Qualpro. The large integration ecosystem in Mews supports complex automation and diverse operational needs.
For hotels seeking a flexible, interconnected system, Mews’s vast partner network is a major advantage. Rentlio’s limited integrations restrict its ability to connect with key third-party tools and expand functionalities.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.62/5 overall rating, with hotels of various sizes and segments praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels in boutique, city-center, and hostel segments rate it particularly highly, often citing it as transformative. Rentlio, lacking recent reviews, has no verifiable ratings or hotel feedback to compare.
With nearly 100 recent reviews, Mews’s high rating and positive comment volume demonstrate consistent user satisfaction. Rentlio’s untested reputation leaves hoteliers without data to gauge its performance or compare experiences.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no mention of freemium plans or implementation fees. Rentlio’s pricing is listed at $1,500 per month, also without free tiers or trial information. The higher price point of Rentlio may reflect its more limited feature set or smaller company size.
Given the transparent pricing and detailed data, Mews’s cost appears competitive for its feature-rich platform. Rentlio’s higher listed price without clear added value makes it less attractive from a cost perspective.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Given the current lack of reviews and detailed feature info, Rentlio’s suitability remains unverified for larger or more complex hotels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a mature, feature-rich, and extensively supported PMS with a proven track record, a vast ecosystem of integrations, and high user satisfaction. Its recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and scalability, making it ideal for diverse hotel types and sizes. Rentlio, while potentially suitable for small, straightforward properties, lacks recent performance data and user feedback, which diminishes confidence in its capabilities.
If your hotel values reliability, extensive features, and proven performance, Mews is the clear choice. Rentlio may appeal if your operations are simple, and you prefer a system with a smaller footprint—though its unverified status warrants caution.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking a dependable, future-proof PMS, Mews remains the stronger option based on recent reviews, feature set, and support quality. Rentlio’s current limited data suggests it’s best to monitor its development before making a migration decision.
According to HTR's product database, Mews PMS and Rentlio share 35 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 13 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial s... The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial setup efficiency. The support team's responsiveness has improved over time, enhancing problem resolution and user satisfaction.
Where hoteliers push back
While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could pr... While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could provide better insights and flexibility for users managing financial operations.
Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynami... Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynamic pricing tools and advanced analytics, especially in multi-property operations.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Mews PMS and Rentlio share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Mews PMS offers 336 verified integration partners, while Rentlio offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Mews PMS: No. Rentlio: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Mews has an HT Score of 100 and Rentlio has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor