The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Softstar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 322 | 0 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, RMS users most value its technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support, while Softstar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 147 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 102 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #8 14 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #11 100 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #13 57 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 50 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 65 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #11 63 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #23 20 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #12 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
Choosing between RMS by RMS and Softstar by Softstar hinges on your hotel's specific needs. RMS is a comprehensive property management system with a proven track record, while Softstar offers specialized property management features aimed at maximizing operational efficiency. Both aim to streamline your workflows, but their scope and maturity differ significantly.
RMS excels in delivering a broad suite of features with high user satisfaction, especially in larger or complex operations. Softstar, meanwhile, appears more suited for niche property management but lacks the extensive reviews and recent data that bolster RMS's credibility. Are you ready to dive into a detailed comparison?
RMS by RMS stands out as a full-featured property management system trusted across multiple regions, including North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, with over 7,000 users. It offers a broad feature set, like integrated CRS, online support, payment processing, and a guest portal, all within a cloud-based platform. Softstar, on the other hand, lacks publicly available geographic reach, verified integrations, or recent reviews, making RMS's extensive market presence more compelling.
Both products aim to improve operational workflows; RMS's features include revenue management, group booking, and automated night audits, which are absent in Softstar. RMS also benefits from a higher overall rating (4.56/5) based on 293 recent reviews, contrasting sharply with Softstar’s lack of review data. With more recent customer feedback, RMS demonstrates a stable, well-supported solution. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s size and complexity?
If your hotel is a mid to large operation seeking a trusted, feature-rich PMS, RMS is the better fit. It supports complex needs like group management, multi-currency, and channel integration, perfect for hotels aiming to scale or improve revenue control. Softstar may appeal if you're managing a small portfolio of rentals with a focus on financial automation, but the absence of recent reviews and verified integrations makes RMS the more reliable choice.
Hotels in need of a comprehensive, proven platform with extensive integrations—like online travel agencies and payment systems—should choose RMS. If your team favors a system with high user ratings, robust customer support, and ongoing development, RMS’s 20 recent reviews and 86% likelihood to recommend speak volumes. Does your property require a versatile PMS capable of handling growth and complexity? If yes, RMS is the clear winner.
RMS’s user experience scores a solid 4.28/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive booking chart and simple online interface. Support is rated at 4.48/5, and onboarding receives a 4.12/5, with users highlighting helpful, responsive customer service and straightforward setup. Softstar’s usability remains unreviewed, making it difficult to assess its ease of adoption or user satisfaction.
Given RMS’s extensive user feedback and recent reviews, it’s evident that their platform is well-designed for ease of use, especially for staff familiar with PMS systems. The availability of digital learning resources and proactive support also enhances the onboarding process. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers an expansive 74 features, including integrated CRS, online support, payment processing, booking engine, EPoS, revenue management, group functionalities, housekeeping modules, guest CRM, and more—features not present in Softstar. Its feature set also includes automation tools like night audit, multi-lingual and multi-currency support, and advanced reporting.
Softstar’s feature list remains unspecified, but it appears to focus on automation and financial management, with no verified features or recent updates available. RMS’s depth, proven track record, and comprehensive toolset give it a clear edge. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s customer support is highly rated at 4.48/5, with recent reviews praising its quick, helpful responses, and knowledgeable staff. Customers report rapid issue resolution, with testimonials highlighting support team patience and responsiveness—“Support is proactive and extremely helpful,” says one user.
In contrast, Softstar has no available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its support quality unverified. RMS’s ongoing support and positive customer feedback make it the safer choice for hotels prioritizing reliable assistance. Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified partner integrations, including Criton, Sage, Fairmas, and STR, covering a wide range of hospitality needs. These integrations facilitate seamless connection with PMS, revenue management, POS, and distribution channels. Softstar, with zero verified integrations, falls far behind in this area.
If your hotel depends on extensive third-party integrations to operate smoothly, RMS’s ecosystem will serve you better. Its verified partners help standardize operations across different systems, saving time and reducing errors. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s user ratings reflect high satisfaction, particularly among boutique, resort, and independent hotels. Its 4.56/5 overall score, with recent reviews praising ease of use, customer support, and feature depth, indicates strong hotelier approval. The 20 reviews in the last six months reinforce RMS’s relevance and responsiveness.
Softstar’s lack of reviews or recent feedback makes it impossible to gauge user sentiment. Without measurable ratings or recent testimonials, RMS’s proven reputation makes it the more trusted choice among hoteliers. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s pricing begins at $800 per month, with no free trials or implementation fees. This flat-rate model covers its extensive feature set, making it predictable for budgeting.
Softstar’s pricing details are unavailable, limiting direct comparison. Given RMS’s transparent pricing and clear value proposition supported by recent reviews, it provides better cost clarity and justification. If budget predictability matters, RMS offers a straightforward, scalable pricing structure.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal need for advanced features, or if you prefer a free or low-cost solution.
Not ideal if your operation requires a broad feature set, integrations, or proven market presence. Softstar’s limited public data makes it less suitable for larger or more complex properties.
RMS offers a comprehensive, well-supported platform trusted by thousands worldwide, with recent reviews confirming its ongoing relevance. Its extensive feature set, integrations, and high satisfaction ratings make it ideal for mid to large-sized hotels and resorts aiming for operational excellence.
Softstar may appeal to small operators seeking automation and financial management tools, but the absence of recent reviews and verified integrations diminishes its reliability for larger hotels. If you’re looking for a proven, scalable PMS, RMS is the clear choice.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich platform that is well-reviewed and supports growth, RMS is the optimal choice. It’s backed by recent, positive feedback and a broad ecosystem of integrations. Opt for RMS if you prioritize scalability, support, and capabilities; consider Softstar only if your operation is small, niche, and can accept limited external validation.
According to HTR's product database, RMS and Softstar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RMS and Softstar share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. RMS offers 112 verified integration partners, while Softstar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RMS: No. Softstar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RMS has an HT Score of 91 and Softstar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor