The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
AsiaPay shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 69 | 0 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, ROH users most value its automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support, while AsiaPay users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
AsiaPay |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
AsiaPay |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #3 2 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 13 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 21 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 25 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
AsiaPay |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 31 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 34 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 28 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #3 4 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
AsiaPay |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 61 reviews | — |
| Europe | #3 1 reviews | — |
Choosing a payments processing software for your hotel involves considering ease of use, feature set, support, and cost. ROH by ROH stands out with its extensive recent review data and high user satisfaction, while AsiaPay by AsiaPay has limited reviews and no recent feedback. Both aim to streamline payments, but your decision should align with your hotel’s specific needs and operational complexity.
ROH offers a comprehensive, hotel-focused platform backed by a strong reputation, whereas AsiaPay’s presence is minimal and lacks recent customer insights. Are you ready to prioritize proven, user-rated software over less documented options?
ROH and AsiaPay both serve the hotel industry with payment solutions, yet they diverge sharply in market presence and customer feedback. ROH’s platform is tailored specifically for hospitality, automating invoicing, scheduling, and payments, and it has garnered a solid reputation with 65 reviews and an impressive 4.97/5 customer support rating. AsiaPay, by comparison, has no available reviews or recent user feedback, making its effectiveness and usability uncertain.
ROH’s 10 recent reviews in the last 6 months, with a 99% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction and active use by hotels across various segments. AsiaPay’s lack of reviews means you are relying solely on vendor claims without validation from hotel operators.
Are you comfortable choosing a solution with proven hotel-specific performance backed by recent reviews, or do you prefer to explore a less documented option?
If your hotel needs a payment platform focused on automating billing, refunds, pre-authorizations, and offering features like payment splitting and tokenization, go with ROH. Its extensive feature set—19 unique functionalities—caters to mid- to large-sized hotels looking to optimize revenue flow. For hotels that prioritize reliable customer support, recent positive reviews, and proven operational benefits, ROH is the clear choice.
If your hotel is considering a highly customizable, perhaps broader payment solution without recent hotel-specific feedback, AsiaPay might seem attractive. However, with zero reviews and no demonstrated hotel success stories, it’s difficult to justify over ROH’s proven track record. For most hoteliers seeking confidence backed by recent user experiences, ROH is the safer bet.
ROH scores an exceptional 4.95/5 for ease of use, with many users commenting on its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Customers highlight how simple it is to send and receive payments, with minimal training needed—“ROH makes it so EASY!” is a common sentiment. The onboarding process is rated 4.92/5, reinforcing that staff can adopt it rapidly.
In contrast, AsiaPay offers no available usability ratings or recent reviews, leaving its ease of use unverified. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to gauge how quickly your team can adapt or how straightforward the platform will be for daily operations.
Edge: ROH.
ROH leads with 19 distinct features designed specifically for hospitality, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, recurring payments, and support for multiple card types like Visa, Amex, and Discover. Unique functionalities like installment plans and PCI compliance further enhance its appeal. AsiaPay offers no detailed feature list or hotel-specific functionalities, limiting confidence in its capabilities.
ROH’s feature depth supports complex payment scenarios that hotels encounter regularly, providing more control and flexibility. With no comparable feature set available from AsiaPay, ROH offers a clear advantage for hotels seeking comprehensive payment management.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s customer support scores an impressive 4.97/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness: “The support staff is great!” and “Initial training was very thorough and helpful.” These high ratings indicate that your team can expect prompt assistance and ongoing service.
AsiaPay offers no recent reviews or support ratings, making it difficult to assess how well they serve hotel clients. Without verified customer feedback, you risk less reliable support, which can be costly during critical payment or integration issues.
Edge: ROH.
ROH connects with one verified partner: Oracle Hospitality, with additional integrations in development. AsiaPay also reports one verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution. Their shared integration landscape is limited, suggesting both are still expanding their ecosystem.
However, because ROH’s integration with Oracle Hospitality is well-established and often critical for hotel operations, it provides a more reliable foundation for streamlining financial workflows. The lack of broader integrations in both options indicates a focus on core payment functions rather than extensive ecosystem connectivity.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s recent reviews show a near-perfect rating of 4.97/5, with 10 reviews from the last 6 months, indicating current user satisfaction. Hotels across segments, especially luxury and independent properties, appreciate its ease of use and support, with comments like “It makes my job so much easier.”
AsiaPay has no available reviews, so no current hotel ratings or feedback are accessible. Without recent ratings, it’s impossible to determine how well it performs or is perceived in the field.
Edge: ROH.
ROH is priced at a flat fee of $100 per month, with no free tier, trial, implementation fees, or per-room charges. Its transparent pricing makes budgeting straightforward. Meanwhile, AsiaPay’s pricing details are unavailable, making it difficult to compare value or assess potential costs.
Given the clarity of ROH’s pricing and its proven value (rated 4.84/5 for ROI), it provides a predictable investment for hotels seeking reliable payment processing.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
ROH’s core advantage is its proven track record, extensive recent reviews, and dedicated hospitality features. Its high satisfaction ratings and active user base make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, support, and a feature-rich platform backed by recent hotel feedback, ROH is the clear winner. Its transparent pricing and focused support make it suitable for hotels of all sizes looking to improve cash flow and operational efficiency.
Conversely, AsiaPay’s limited data and absence of recent reviews suggest it’s a less certain option. Without proven hotel-specific success stories or recent customer validation, it’s better suited for hotels in regions or markets where local support is more critical, or for those willing to take a risk on less documented solutions.
In summary, if you want a payments platform with verified performance, active hotel users, and ongoing support, choose ROH. For hotels valuing flexibility and regional presence over proven hotel-specific features, AsiaPay might be worth exploring—but with caution.
According to HTR's product database, ROH and SiamPay by Asiapay share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
AsiaPay |
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ROH and SiamPay by Asiapay share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. ROH offers 1 verified integration partners, while SiamPay by Asiapay offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ROH: No. SiamPay by Asiapay: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ROH has an HT Score of 100 and AsiaPay has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor