The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
SMS Springer Miller Systems shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 209 | 0 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, RoomRaccoon users most value its user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents, while SMS Springer Miller Systems users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
SMS Springer Miller Systems |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
SMS Springer Miller Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #10 90 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #17 27 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #14 7 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
SMS Springer Miller Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 100 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 64 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 29 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #7 28 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
SMS Springer Miller Systems |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #24 7 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #5 123 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #31 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #31 1 reviews | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that simplifies operations, boosts revenue, and improves guest experience. RoomRaccoon and SMS Host both claim to deliver these benefits, but only one has built a proven track record with recent reviews and a broad feature set. The key question is: which platform truly meets your hotel’s needs today?
RoomRaccoon is the clear leader in user feedback, with over 169 reviews and a recent surge of five in the last six months, giving it a distinct advantage in representing current customer satisfaction. Conversely, SMS Host lacks recent reviews and a visible review base, making it less reliable as a decision factor. So, which system will best serve your hotel?
Both platforms aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches differ significantly. RoomRaccoon integrates a variety of tools—channel management, booking engine, payment processing, and more—into a single, cloud-based platform. Users praise its intuitive interface and automation features that help reduce manual tasks and increase revenue. Meanwhile, SMS Host offers a broader operational scope but lacks recent user validation, and its review profile is nonexistent, making it difficult to assess real-world performance.
The critical difference is in their proven track records: RoomRaccoon has fresh, positive reviews showing consistent performance, whereas SMS Host has none. As a hotelier, your choice hinges on recent, verified user experiences: do you want a system with recent validation or one without?
If your hotel is a small to medium-sized independent property seeking a straightforward, all-in-one PMS with strong user validation, go with RoomRaccoon. Its recent reviews highlight increased direct bookings, revenue growth, and time savings, ideal for hotels that want automation without complexity.
If, however, your hotel requires a mature, highly customizable solution with extensive operational modules and you’re comfortable with less recent user feedback, SMS Host could be considered. But without recent reviews or a large user base, its effectiveness remains uncertain.
In summary, for the majority of hotels today, especially small to mid-sized properties looking for reliability and proven performance, RoomRaccoon is the safer choice.
RoomRaccoon scores a remarkable 4.74 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviewers calling it “simple,” “intuitive,” and “easy to learn.” Its onboarding process boasts a 4.61/5 rating, and users appreciate how quickly staff can adopt the system, often reducing training time significantly. In contrast, SMS Host's usability ratings are unavailable, and no recent customer feedback exists to gauge its user experience.
Given the transparent, positive feedback, your team will likely find RoomRaccoon easier to implement and operate daily. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers a comprehensive suite of 51 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, integrated payment processing, guest CRM, automated night audit, online check-in, and multi-currency support. These features are designed specifically for small to midsize hotels seeking automation and revenue growth.
SMS Host’s feature set remains unspecified and appears minimal in comparison, with no detailed feature count or unique capabilities provided. Its lack of publicly available advanced features makes it difficult to match the depth of RoomRaccoon’s offering.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support team earns a 4.53/5 rating based on recent reviews, with hoteliers describing the service as “responsive,” “helpful,” and “dedicated.” Many users mention quick issue resolution and proactive onboarding assistance. Conversely, there are no recent reviews or publicly available data on SMS Host support, making it impossible to gauge its responsiveness or quality.
Given the strong, recent feedback on support, your hotel is more likely to receive reliable assistance from RoomRaccoon. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon excels with 88 verified integrations, including popular partners like Sage, Flexipass, Becurious, and RevControl. This extensive network allows hotels to connect various tech solutions without manual workarounds. Meanwhile, SMS Host only lists one verified partner, Duetto, offering limited integration capacity and flexibility.
This broad integration ecosystem means your hotel can tailor its tech stack effectively with RoomRaccoon. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews show an impressive overall rating of 4.88 out of 5, with a likelihood to recommend at 94%. Hotels in diverse segments, from boutique inns to serviced apartments, praise its usability, automation, and revenue tools. Its latest reviews also reflect ongoing satisfaction, confirming its current effectiveness.
In contrast, SMS Host has no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, rendering its user satisfaction unknown. Hotelier confidence naturally tilts toward the platform with proven, recent positive feedback.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s pricing starts at $1,000 monthly, with no freemium or trial options, reflecting its all-inclusive feature set. The cost covers the entire platform, including integrations, automation, and support, providing predictability for small hotels.
Pricing details for SMS Host are unavailable, and no trial information is provided. Without transparent pricing, evaluating value becomes difficult, but the lack of recent reviews suggests it may not be a clear investment.
Not ideal if:
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Not ideal if:
Edge: RoomRaccoon — due to its recent reviews and broad feature set.
RoomRaccoon stands out as the more reliable, feature-rich PMS with recent positive feedback from a broad user base. Its extensive integrations, user-friendly interface, and proven support make it ideal for small to midsize independent hotels that want to automate and grow.
SMS Host appears less transparent, with no recent reviews or verified customer feedback, making it difficult to validate its claims. Unless your hotel requires highly tailored or enterprise solutions, RoomRaccoon offers a safer, more effective investment today.
In conclusion, if your goal is a modern, proven platform that simplifies your daily tasks, increases revenue, and keeps your team aligned, choose RoomRaccoon. For properties seeking niche or highly customizable solutions and willing to risk unverified results, SMS Host might be worth exploring, but caution is advised.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
SMS Springer Miller Systems | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, RoomRaccoon PMS and SMS Host share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
SMS Springer Miller Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RoomRaccoon PMS and SMS Host share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88 verified integration partners, while SMS Host offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RoomRaccoon PMS: No. SMS Host: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RoomRaccoon has an HT Score of 80 and SMS Springer Miller Systems has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor