The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Winner Hotel Software shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 209 | 0 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, RoomRaccoon users most value its user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents, while Winner Hotel Software users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #10 90 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #17 27 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #14 7 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 100 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 64 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #14 29 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #7 28 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #24 7 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #5 123 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #31 4 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #31 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for improving your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both RoomRaccoon and Winner PMS aim to streamline tasks, but they diverge significantly in terms of user feedback, features, and global reach. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a well-reviewed, all-in-one solution for small to mid-sized hotels or a system built for larger, more complex operations. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
RoomRaccoon, with over 169 reviews and a recent review count of five in the last six months, demonstrates more current user feedback, making it the more reliable choice today. Its overall rating of 4.88/5 and a high NPS score of 9.09/10 reflect strong user satisfaction, especially from independent and boutique hotels.
Winner PMS, despite being an established product with 400 employees, has no recent reviews or ratings to support current performance or user satisfaction. Its lack of publicly available recent feedback makes its effectiveness and usability less certain now.
Both systems aim to centralize operations—RoomRaccoon by integrating PMS, channel management, booking engine, and automation into a single platform, while Winner PMS emphasizes streamlined hotel workflows and backend management. However, RoomRaccoon’s user reviews emphasize ease of use and automation, whereas Winner PMS’s lack of recent reviews leaves its current standing unclear.
Are you comfortable choosing a system based on its historical reputation without recent validation? Or do you prefer a modern, actively reviewed platform?
If your hotel is an independent boutique, small hotel, or vacation rental operator seeking a user-friendly, all-in-one platform that simplifies daily tasks and enhances revenue, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. Its highly-rated, intuitive interface supports automations for bookings, communication, and revenue management—ideal for smaller teams.
Conversely, if your hotel operates at a larger scale or requires complex integrations and advanced backend management, Winner PMS might seem appealing. Yet, the absence of recent reviews and performance data suggests it lacks the current validation needed for confident investment.
Given RoomRaccoon’s demonstrable user satisfaction and comprehensive feature set, it’s the clear choice for most small to mid-sized properties. Larger operations should scrutinize Winner PMS further but might need more advanced, modern tools.
RoomRaccoon boasts a user experience rated 4.74/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and ease of staff adoption. Many users mention how quickly their team learned the system and how it simplifies daily operations.
Winner PMS, with no recent ratings or user feedback available, leaves its ease of use uncertain. Its larger scale and complexity may introduce a steeper learning curve, especially without recent validation or user testimonials.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers 51 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, integrated payments, mobile app, CRM, guest profiles, and automation tools—many tailored to independent hotels and small chains. Notable features like automated night audits, multi-currency support, guest CRM, and real-time analytics provide a robust operational toolkit.
Winner PMS’s feature set is not publicly detailed, but it emphasizes core backend functions such as reservations, billing, and housekeeping management. Its lack of specific, differentiated features or recent updates, combined with no available feature count, suggests it may lack the breadth and modernity of RoomRaccoon.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support rating of 4.53/5, alongside recent reviews, highlights helpful, responsive customer service—hoteliers cite quick issue resolution and proactive communication. Many users remark that support staff are eager to assist, making onboarding and troubleshooting smoother.
Winner PMS’s support quality is not documented through recent reviews, leaving its current customer service reputation unclear. Its larger size might imply more resources, but the absence of recent feedback limits confidence.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including popular hospitality tools like Sage, Becurious, Paxxio, and RevControl. Its extensive marketplace offers seamless connections with payment systems, CRS, marketing platforms, and more, reducing manual work.
Winner PMS has only one verified integration—Mews—and no publicly documented partner ecosystem. This indicates limited connectivity options and possibly more manual processes for your hotel.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s reviews are predominantly positive, with a 4.88/5 overall rating and a 94% likelihood to recommend among 169 reviews. Hotels of all sizes, especially independent and boutique properties, praise its user-friendliness, automation, and revenue features.
Winner PMS lacks recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its credibility as a preferred solution today is unsupported by recent feedback.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon charges a fixed monthly fee of $1,000, with no freemium or trial options. Pricing includes a comprehensive set of features suitable for small to medium-sized hotels but may be costly for very small operations.
Pricing for Winner PMS is not publicly disclosed, which complicates direct comparison. Its opaque pricing model may lead to hidden costs or unmet expectations.
Larger hotels or hotel groups with complex operational needs and custom workflows.
Hotels seeking a highly customizable, enterprise-level management system.
Teams that prioritize backend processing over guest-facing features.
Hotels with existing infrastructure that requires seamless, deep system integrations.
Not ideal if you prefer modern, actively-reviewed solutions or need transparent, upfront pricing.
RoomRaccoon is a highly-rated, all-in-one PMS designed primarily for small to mid-sized hotels and independent operators. Its extensive feature set, ease of use, and positive, recent user reviews make it the safer, more validated choice today.
Winner PMS, despite its larger size and comprehensive offerings, lacks current user feedback to support its effectiveness. Its limited integrations and opaque pricing further diminish its appeal for today's hotel operators.
For most independent hoteliers and boutique properties, RoomRaccoon provides a proven, user-friendly platform that can significantly improve operations and revenue. Larger hotels with complex needs might consider Winner PMS, but should seek recent validation before committing.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, RoomRaccoon PMS and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RoomRaccoon PMS and Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88 verified integration partners, while Winner PMS (acquired by Mews) offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Winner PMS (acquired by Mews): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. RoomRaccoon has an HT Score of 80 and Winner Hotel Software has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor