The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 105 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Sezam24 shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Hotel Website Check-in Portal.
Straiv shines when it comes to automated guest communication and pre-arrival emails , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Side-by-side ratings based on 105 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 104 |
After analyzing 105 verified reviews, Sezam24 users most value its , while Straiv users highlight automated guest communication and pre-arrival emails, online check-in and pre-check-in workflows, staff efficiency and front-desk relief. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automated guest communication and pre-arrival emails
▾
|
|
|
+
Online check-in and pre-check-in workflows
▾
|
|
|
+
Staff efficiency and front-desk relief
▾
|
|
|
+
Integrations with PMS and hotel systems
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization, templates, and flexible module setup
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting, analytics, and admin usability
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile app, kiosk, and device support
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #16 1 reviews | #3 27 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 41 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 8 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #5 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 28 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #4 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #16 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #16 1 reviews | #2 79 reviews |
Choosing between Sezam24 by Sezam24 and straiv by straiv hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and guest experience goals. Both products solve the core challenge of contactless check-in, but they diverge in features, regional presence, and customer support, which impacts suitability.
Sezam24 emphasizes a straightforward, high-rated self-service check-in system with a focus on accuracy, multi-language support, and budget-friendly small hotels. Straiv offers a broader suite of digital services, stronger integration options, and a more extensive global presence, catering to hotels seeking comprehensive guest journey management. Are you prioritizing simplicity or a broader feature set?
Sezam24 is ideal if your hotel operates with minimal staff, mainly in budget or small properties, and needs a reliable, straightforward check-in solution. Its high 5/5 overall rating and 100% likelihood to recommend from recent reviews demonstrate consistent quality, especially for properties that value accuracy, multilingual support, and easy implementation.
Straiv, with a 4.81/5 rating and more recent reviews (8 in the last 6 months), suits hotels aiming to streamline all aspects of the guest experience through digital services beyond check-in, such as messaging, upselling, and PMS integrations. If your hotel plans to scale or requires a multi-function platform with extensive partner integrations, straiv is more suited.
In essence, choose Sezam24 if your hotel’s focus is on a simple, highly rated check-in kiosk for budget properties. Opt for straiv if your hotel needs a full guest journey platform with a broader feature set and regional coverage.
Sezam24 boasts a perfect 5/5 ease-of-use rating, bolstered by its straightforward self-service kiosk interface, proven in reviews as “accurate, correct, and uninterrupted.” Its onboarding process is rated 5/5, and its simplicity appeals especially to small hotels with limited staff.
Straiv’s ease-of-use rating of 4.69/5 reflects a highly intuitive platform, praised for its user-friendly design and smooth guest journey. Its onboarding score of 4.62/5 indicates a slightly steeper learning curve, but support responsiveness helps mitigate this.
Edge: Sezam24.
Sezam24 offers 10 exclusive features, including hotel website check-in portals, document scanning, pre-registration info collection, and multi-lingual support—key for budget hotels with multilingual guests. Its features focus on essential self-service check-in and operational accuracy.
Straiv provides 12 features, including mobile check-in, guest messaging, room service ordering, PMS integration, and pre-arrival upselling. Its platform supports a broad guest journey, from online check-in to personalized services, making it more versatile.
Edge: straiv.
Sezam24’s customer support is rated a perfect 5/5, with reviews emphasizing “accuracy, correctness, and uninterrupted work,” indicating highly reliable service and onboarding. Its support team appears highly responsive, especially valued by small hotels needing dependable help.
Straiv’s support scores 4.72/5, with recent reviews praising “quick problem resolution” and “helpful support,” though some users note occasional glitches. Its dedicated team actively develops the platform, ensuring ongoing improvements.
Edge: Sezam24.
straiv boasts 36 verified integrations, including major PMS systems like Oracle Hospitality, Protel, and apaleo, along with key partners like SALTO Systems and Hotelkit, offering a broad ecosystem for larger hotels or chains.
Sezam24, with 9 verified partners, includes common integrations like WuBook and HotelTime, but has fewer options overall, aligning with its focus on small, budget properties.
Edge: straiv.
Sezam24’s perfect 5/5 rating from a single recent review highlights strong satisfaction among small, budget hotels. However, its limited review count (1) and regional presence suggest less global validation.
straiv’s 4.81/5 from 78 recent reviews across multiple countries, including Europe and other regions, shows broader, more recent user engagement. Hotels in diverse segments—city center, boutique, serviced apartments—rate it highly, especially for its comprehensive features.
Edge: straiv.
Sezam24 costs a flat $300 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees, making it budget-friendly for small hotels with straightforward needs. Its pricing structure favors property owners seeking simplicity and affordability.
straiv is priced at $500 per month without a trial, reflecting its broader features and integrations, suitable for hotels with larger budgets or those seeking a more comprehensive digital guest platform.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Sezam24 excels at providing a straightforward, highly-rated self-check-in solution for small, budget hotels seeking simplicity and reliability. Its limited feature set and regional focus mean it’s best suited for properties prioritizing operational efficiency over extensive guest engagement.
Straiv offers a broader platform that manages the entire guest journey, with more integrations, features, and recent positive reviews from hotels across many countries. It’s ideal for properties needing a scalable, multi-function digital solution that enhances operational flows and guest satisfaction.
If your hotel prioritizes a simple, proven check-in kiosk, Sezam24 is the clear choice. For hotels committed to a comprehensive digital guest experience and extensive automation, straiv provides more value.
In conclusion, for most hotels seeking recent, high-volume reviews and a more versatile platform, straiv's wider adoption and ongoing development make it the stronger recommendation. However, if budget and simplicity are paramount, Sezam24 remains a solid, highly-rated option.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Pre-Arrival & Check-in
|
|
|
| Hotel Website Check-in Portal | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
| Self Service Checkout | ||
| Self Service Checkin | ||
| Device Agnostic | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
|
▾
Information Collection
|
|
|
| Custom Questions | ||
| Terms & Conditions Signing | ||
| Marketing Communications Opt-in | ||
| Pre-regisration info collection | ||
| Document & Passport Scanning | ||
| ID Verification | ||
|
▾
Translations
|
|
|
| Automatic Translations | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
|
▾
Payments & Authorization
|
|
|
| Registration Card E-signature | ||
| Collect Deposits | ||
| Payment & Authorizations | ||
| ID Verification | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
|
▾
Mobile Key
|
|
|
| Door Lock Integration | ||
|
▾
Upgrades & Upselling
|
|
|
| Pre-arrival Upselling & Upgrades | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| PMS Integration |
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many reviewers mention automated emails, pre-arrival communication, and other guest messaging as a core benefit. Straiv helps hotels keep guests infor... Many reviewers mention automated emails, pre-arrival communication, and other guest messaging as a core benefit. Straiv helps hotels keep guests informed before arrival and reduces manual follow-up, though a few note that email layouts and the number of messages could be improved.
Users most often praise Straiv for making pre-check-in and self check-in fast, simple, and low-friction for both guests and staff. Reviews say it redu... Users most often praise Straiv for making pre-check-in and self check-in fast, simple, and low-friction for both guests and staff. Reviews say it reduces reception workload, speeds arrivals, and creates a smoother guest experience, especially when templates and automation are set up well.
A recurring theme is that Straiv relieves reception staff by shifting routine check-in tasks into a digital process. Hotels say this makes service fas... A recurring theme is that Straiv relieves reception staff by shifting routine check-in tasks into a digital process. Hotels say this makes service faster and more comfortable for guests while freeing staff to focus on higher-value interactions and exception handling.
Where hoteliers push back
Users like the customization options, drag-and-drop forms, and flexible module structure, which make it easier to adapt Straiv to different hotel proc... Users like the customization options, drag-and-drop forms, and flexible module structure, which make it easier to adapt Straiv to different hotel processes. At the same time, some say backend setup can be confusing or time-consuming, especially when managing multilingual content or changing modules.
Some hotels want stronger analytics, better statistics, and a more polished admin experience. Feedback also points to backend usability issues such as... Some hotels want stronger analytics, better statistics, and a more polished admin experience. Feedback also points to backend usability issues such as confusing navigation, manual language updates, incomplete reporting, and an imperfect ticket history process.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Sezam24 and Straiv share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Sezam24 offers 9 verified integration partners, while Straiv offers 38. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sezam24 leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Sezam24: No. Straiv: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Sezam24 has an HT Score of 0 and Straiv has 78. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property