The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,298 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines when it comes to ease of use and centralized operations — especially for independent properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing.
Simple Booking shines in ease of use and customer support .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,298 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1,276 | 22 |
After analyzing 1,298 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its ease of use and centralized operations, channel sync and ota distribution, reporting and analytics, while Simple Booking users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and centralized operations
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel sync and OTA distribution
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
Training, onboarding, and learning resources
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Missing hotel workflow features and customization limits
▾
|
|
|
−
Support responsiveness and service quality
▾
|
|
|
−
Payments, invoicing, and financial workflows
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 572 reviews | #26 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 171 reviews | #19 12 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 42 reviews | #18 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #11 4 reviews | #26 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 484 reviews | #23 9 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 213 reviews | #22 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 108 reviews | #28 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 92 reviews | #26 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 405 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 183 reviews | #13 19 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 231 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #6 14 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
Choosing a channel manager is vital for your hotel's distribution, visibility, and operational efficiency. Both Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator and Simple Booking aim to streamline your reservations and multi-channel presence, but they diverge significantly in scale, support, and recent performance. With Cloudbeds dominating in reviews and market reach, understanding their differences is key to making an informed choice.
Are you ready to select the solution that best fits your property's size, complexity, and growth plans?
Cloudbeds’ MyAllocator is a comprehensive, widely adopted channel management system trusted by over a thousand hotels worldwide, with a 4.64/5 overall rating supported by over 1,000 reviews. Simple Booking, by contrast, has a very limited review count—only 21 reviews—and a 0/5 overall score, which diminishes confidence in its current usability and support.
While both promise to connect your property with multiple OTAs, Cloudbeds offers a broader ecosystem and more recent reviews, indicating ongoing improvements. Given the stark difference in review volume and recency, Cloudbeds’ platform is generally more reliable and trusted.
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable platform with extensive integrations, advanced features, and proven support, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. Its user base spans boutique hotels, hostels, and large resorts, and it offers 190 verified integration partners, including major OTAs and tech providers.
However, if your property is small, with minimal distribution needs, and you're looking for a simple, budget-friendly solution with a straightforward booking engine, Simple Booking might suffice. Yet, its low review count and lack of recent feedback suggest it’s less dependable for growing or complex operations.
For most hotels aiming for growth and reliable support, Cloudbeds is the better choice.
Cloudbeds scores 4.6/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive dashboard and straightforward setup, though some mention occasional lag during peak hours. Conversely, Simple Booking’s user rating is 4.95/5, with reviews highlighting its speed and user-friendly interface for managing reservations.
Despite the higher perceived simplicity of Simple Booking, Cloudbeds’ more extensive onboarding and support resources make it accessible for a broader range of users. Edge: Simple Booking, for its slightly higher ease-of-use score and positive recent feedback.
Cloudbeds offers 14 shared features with Simple Booking but also includes three exclusive functionalities: centralized user & role management, unlimited channels without extra charges, and integrated payment processing. Simple Booking’s core features focus on booking engine and channel management, but it lacks advanced functionalities like role management or payment integration.
Cloudbeds’s broader feature set, especially around multi-user management and automation, makes it more suitable for hotels with complex operations or multiple staff roles. Edge: Cloudbeds, with its richer, more versatile features tailored for larger or more sophisticated properties.
Cloudbeds’s support is rated 4.41/5, with reviews mentioning its responsiveness but also occasional delays. Simple Booking has a slightly higher support rating of 4.81/5, with reviewers praising its attentive service and faster issue resolution.
Given the larger user base and recent reviews, Cloudbeds’s support is more tested and reliable, though Simple Booking’s support appears more personalized. Edge: Simple Booking, for its higher support rating and recent positive feedback, though limited review volume warrants caution.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major OTAs and tech solutions like SiteMinder, TripAdvisor, and RateGain, with 22 shared integrations with Simple Booking. Simple Booking has 56 verified partners, mostly regional or niche providers, with fewer global OTAs.
If extensive, flexible integrations matter for your distribution strategy, Cloudbeds’s marketplace offers more options and better support for multi-platform management. Edge: Cloudbeds, thanks to its larger, more diverse ecosystem.
Cloudbeds’s reviews are significantly more numerous, with a 4.64/5 rating and recent positive comments from users across various hotel types, including boutique and hostel segments. Simple Booking has only 21 reviews and a 0/5 score, indicating limited feedback and possible dissatisfaction.
Given the volume and recency of Cloudbeds reviews, hoteliers rate it higher, especially for reliability, support, and feature depth. Edge: Cloudbeds, with its proven track record and broader user satisfaction.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $200 per month, with no freemium options or implementation fees. Cloudbeds, however, offers a more extensive platform with additional capabilities included at this price point, whereas Simple Booking’s limited feature set may not justify the same value.
Considering the feature breadth and support, Cloudbeds’s pricing provides better value for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution, especially as they scale. Both are similarly priced, but Cloudbeds delivers more for your investment.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Simple Booking.
Cloudbeds stands out as a comprehensive, reliable, and widely supported channel management solution. Its extensive feature set, global integrations, and strong recent reviews make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming to grow beyond basic needs.
Choose Cloudbeds if your hotel requires scalability, detailed analytics, multi-property management, and a proven track record. Its larger ecosystem and recent performance improvements position it as the top option for most mid-sized and growing hotels.
Simple Booking may suit very small, budget-conscious properties looking for a basic reservation system, but its limited reviews and lack of recent feedback suggest it’s less suited for hotels with ambitions to expand or optimize distribution. If your hotel values dependability and comprehensive features, Cloudbeds is the clear choice.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $200/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Rate Management
|
|
|
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
|
▾
Room Type Mapping
|
|
|
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
|
▾
Automation & Syncing
|
|
|
| Bulk Updates & Multiple Restrictions | ||
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
|
▾
Administration & Settings
|
|
|
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Integrated Payment Processing | ||
|
▾
Analytics & Reporting
|
|
|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| Unlimited Channels (no additional cost) |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Reviewers frequently highlight Cloudbeds as intuitive, easy to learn, and practical for day-to-day hotel work. They value having PMS, reservations, ch... Reviewers frequently highlight Cloudbeds as intuitive, easy to learn, and practical for day-to-day hotel work. They value having PMS, reservations, channel management, and related tasks in one workflow, which saves time and reduces operational complexity.
Users most often say Cloudbeds keeps inventory, rates, and bookings synchronized across OTAs in real time, cutting double-bookings and manual updates.... Users most often say Cloudbeds keeps inventory, rates, and bookings synchronized across OTAs in real time, cutting double-bookings and manual updates. Many describe it as a dependable way to manage distribution from one place and improve occupancy control.
Many users praise the reporting for giving visibility into occupancy, revenue, comparisons, and operational performance, helping management make bette... Many users praise the reporting for giving visibility into occupancy, revenue, comparisons, and operational performance, helping management make better decisions. At the same time, several ask for deeper customization, easier exports, and more finance-focused detail.
Where hoteliers push back
Reviewers point to gaps in advanced operational workflows such as split stays, room moves, waiting lists, room status controls, group handling, and ed... Reviewers point to gaps in advanced operational workflows such as split stays, room moves, waiting lists, room status controls, group handling, and editable notes or reservations. These comments suggest Cloudbeds is strong for core distribution, but some properties need more flexibility for complex hotel operations.
Some reviewers praise fast, knowledgeable support and helpful implementation assistance, especially during onboarding. Others strongly criticize slow... Some reviewers praise fast, knowledgeable support and helpful implementation assistance, especially during onboarding. Others strongly criticize slow or inaccessible support after go-live, saying delays during outages or sync problems can hurt guest service and revenue.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) and Simple Booking (Channel Manager) share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) offers 195 verified integration partners, while Simple Booking (Channel Manager) offers 57. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Simple Booking (Channel Manager) leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): No. Simple Booking (Channel Manager): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 98 and Simple Booking has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property