The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 313 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in support quality and onboarding — especially for vacation rental properties (4.9/5), with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing.
Simple Booking shines in Ease of Use — especially for boutique properties (4.9/5).
Side-by-side ratings based on 313 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 291 | 22 |
After analyzing 313 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its support quality and onboarding, ease of use and workflow efficiency, centralized multi-channel booking management, while Simple Booking users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support quality and onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of use and workflow efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized multi-channel booking management
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct bookings and SEO
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Mobile app / mobile access limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 80 reviews | #26 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #13 23 reviews | #18 12 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #17 4 reviews | #19 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 2 reviews | #25 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 48 reviews | #25 9 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 50 reviews | #23 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 27 reviews | #28 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 29 reviews | #27 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 26 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 232 reviews | #14 19 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | #25 0 reviews |
| Middle East | #22 2 reviews | #11 2 reviews |
eviivo Suite™ CM and Simple Booking both specialize in channel management for hotels, but their operational fit diverges sharply in scale, geography, and feature depth. eviivo serves a broad global footprint, including North and South America and Europe across 27 countries, with a user base weighted heavily toward vacation rentals (31% of users) and B&Bs (25%). In contrast, Simple Booking focuses primarily on Europe, the Middle East, Asia Pacific, and South America across 5 countries, with a hotel customer base skewed toward luxury hotels (21%), resorts (18%), and city center hotels (14%).
Both platforms solve the core problem of real-time synchronization of availability and rates across multiple OTAs to prevent overbookings while maximizing distribution reach. This synchronization reduces manual workload, centralizes inventory control, and boosts direct bookings. However, eviivo emphasizes automation and multi-property management with integrated payment processing, while Simple Booking leverages a fast, user-friendly interface and a broad integrations ecosystem tied to the Zucchetti hospitality group.
If your property is a small to medium vacation rental, B&B, or boutique hotel operating in diverse international markets, eviivo is the better choice. Its 291 reviews averaging 4.8/5 overall—with 38 recent reviews in the last six months maintaining a 4.4/5 score—reflect strong performance and ongoing product stability. eviivo’s integrated payment processing and automation features reduce front desk workload and minimize overbooking risk, critical for multi-property operators or independent B&Bs managing complex calendars.
If you run a luxury or resort hotel, especially in Europe or the Middle East, Simple Booking’s channel manager fits well. Despite only 22 reviews with no activity in the last six months, Simple Booking scores equally high at 4.8/5 overall and leads eviivo slightly in ease of use (5/5 vs 4.6/5) and onboarding (4.8/5 vs 4.6/5). Its platform is praised for speed and simplicity, making it suitable where staff prioritize quick adoption and straightforward channel updates. However, limited recent review volume suggests the current product experience may be less validated.
For hotels with strong back-office complexity or those needing integrated payments and multi-property automation, eviivo is a safer, more proven option. Properties prioritizing ease of use and supported within the Zucchetti ecosystem may prefer Simple Booking but should weigh the smaller, less recent review base carefully.
Simple Booking leads in ease of use with a perfect score of 5/5 and onboarding at 4.8/5, compared to eviivo’s 4.6/5 ease of use and 4.6/5 onboarding. Reviewers highlight Simple Booking’s intuitive, fast interface and pleasant user experience, noting that even the least tech-savvy staff find it accessible. One user said it “is certainly an ideal tool for independent hotels or timeshares” due to simple channel manager operations.
eviivo users appreciate the centralized control and automation but caution that some settings can be complex, requiring initial support and training. Reviews mention that users without advanced computer skills might face a learning curve despite overall intuitive design.
Both platforms receive positive comments on onboarding support quality, though Simple Booking’s onboarding ratings edge slightly higher. Given these data points, Simple Booking offers a smoother learning curve and faster staff adoption, particularly for smaller teams or properties without dedicated tech personnel.
Edge: Simple Booking.
eviivo Suite includes one key feature absent from Simple Booking: integrated payment processing. This capability automates payment capture directly within the booking flow, reducing manual reconciliation for front desk and accounting teams, and accelerating cash flow—an operational advantage especially relevant for vacation rentals and multi-property managers.
Beyond that, both products share 14 channel management features, including real-time rate and availability syncing, OTA connectivity, and booking consolidation. Simple Booking does not list any unique features beyond this shared set.
The integrated payment processing in eviivo reduces payment-related follow-ups and errors, enabling smoother check-in workflows and better revenue assurance. Simple Booking’s feature set focuses on channel and booking management without embedded payment tools, meaning properties using it must rely on external payment processors and reconciliation workflows.
Edge: eviivo Suite™ CM.
Both products achieve very close customer support ratings: eviivo 4.7/5 and Simple Booking 4.8/5. Onboarding scores similarly reflect these high marks.
eviivo reviews praise support teams as responsive, patient, and courteous, often highlighting assistance during setup and issue resolution. However, some users report inconsistent support quality, slow responses on weekends, and a ticketing system that occasionally delays acknowledgments.
Simple Booking support is described as “impeccable” and “always operational” in positive reviews, although a few note that support has become harder to reach and more cumbersome over time. One reviewer lamented a decline from previously excellent service.
Overall, both companies provide solid support experiences with minor but different caveats. The data do not justify a clear edge.
Edge: Even.
Simple Booking supports 59 verified integrations, 69% more than eviivo’s 35. Both share 8 common partners, including Hotelchamp, eRevMax, Tripadvisor, and Duve, which cover popular OTA connectivity, reputation management, and guest engagement tools.
Unique to eviivo are integrations with D-Edge, RoomPriceGenie, PriceLabs, CheKin, and Vikey S.r.l, advancing revenue management, guest self-check-in, and access control workflows. These features strengthen eviivo’s operational automation for properties needing smooth revenue optimization and guest processing.
Simple Booking’s unique partners include AdsHotel, Priority Software, HiJiffy, Sojern, yieldPlanet, and Cendyn, broadening marketing automation, AI guest messaging, and pricing intelligence options. These integrations benefit hotels focusing on marketing-driven direct bookings and pricing agility within the Zucchetti ecosystem.
Hotels seeking advanced operational automation and payment integration lean toward eviivo’s integration ecosystem. Hotels prioritizing marketing, pricing analytics, and guest engagement tools may find Simple Booking’s integrations more extensive.
Edge: Simple Booking.
Both products share the same overall rating of 4.8/5, but only eviivo has a substantial review volume—291 total with 38 in the last six months averaging 4.4/5. Simple Booking’s 22 reviews with no recent activity weaken the representativeness of its rating.
eviivo scores highest among vacation rentals and villas (4.9/5, 107 reviews) and B&Bs and inns (4.8/5, 130 reviews), segments where Simple Booking has minimal presence. Conversely, Simple Booking rates highest within luxury hotels (4.9/5, 8 reviews), resorts (4.6/5, 9 reviews), and city center hotels (4.6/5, 8 reviews), segments where eviivo has fewer reviews.
Given eviivo’s much larger and more recent review set, its ratings better reflect current product quality. Simple Booking’s ratings for luxury and branded hotels are positive but based on very small samples.
Edge: Even.
eviivo’s base price is $700, while Simple Booking’s base price is $200. Neither platform offers a freemium model, monthly flat fees, per-room pricing, implementation fees, or trials.
The higher base price of eviivo reflects its broader feature set, including integrated payment processing and a larger global footprint. Simple Booking’s lower entry cost may appeal to smaller or budget-conscious hotels but could require additional investment in payment processing or integrations.
Pricing data is limited to base prices without published detailed tiers, so exact total cost of ownership depends on property size, add-ons, and service levels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between eviivo Suite™ CM and Simple Booking lies in their operational focus and market footprint. eviivo targets smaller and medium vacation rental and B&B operators worldwide, offering integrated payment processing and automation features that reduce manual workload and overbooking risks. Simple Booking serves luxury and resort hotels mainly in Europe and neighboring regions, with a streamlined user experience and a broader integration ecosystem geared toward marketing and pricing intelligence.
Choose eviivo if your hotel operates multiple properties, requires integrated payment processing, and values automation to save hours of manual work daily. Its proven record in reducing overbookings and expanding direct bookings through automation and centralized management is backed by 291 reviews, including 38 recent ones maintaining a strong 4.4/5 rating.
Choose Simple Booking if your property is a luxury or resort hotel within its primary regions, and your priority is ease of use, fast onboarding, and access to a diverse integrations network powered by the Zucchetti group. Although based on fewer and older reviews, Simple Booking scores higher for ease of use and onboarding, making it preferable for teams seeking a simple, intuitive platform.
This comparison favors operational depth and review-backed evidence: eviivo is better for automated, multi-property channel management with integrated payments globally, while Simple Booking suits luxury hotels focused on ease and marketing integrations in Europe and adjacent markets.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $200/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Rate Management
|
|
|
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
|
▾
Room Type Mapping
|
|
|
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
|
▾
Automation & Syncing
|
|
|
| Bulk Updates & Multiple Restrictions | ||
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
|
▾
Administration & Settings
|
|
|
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Integrated Payment Processing | ||
|
▾
Analytics & Reporting
|
|
|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews praise Eviivo’s support team for being responsive, patient, and helpful during setup, activation, and day-to-day use. At the same time, a... Many reviews praise Eviivo’s support team for being responsive, patient, and helpful during setup, activation, and day-to-day use. At the same time, a few users report inconsistent chat quality, slow response times, limited out-of-hours help, or a need for more hands-on training and clearer guidance.
Users frequently describe the platform as simple, intuitive, and time-saving, especially for managing bookings, calendars, and property operations in... Users frequently describe the platform as simple, intuitive, and time-saving, especially for managing bookings, calendars, and property operations in one place. Some also note that certain settings are complex or not always intuitive, so the product appears strongest for teams that want efficiency but may require onboarding to unlock it fully.
Users repeatedly say Eviivo brings reservations from OTAs and direct channels into one place, making it easier to manage multiple properties or agenci... Users repeatedly say Eviivo brings reservations from OTAs and direct channels into one place, making it easier to manage multiple properties or agencies from a single calendar. This centralization saves time, reduces manual work, and gives operators a clearer view of bookings across their distribution network.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate being able to manage reservations remotely, others say the mobile experience is weak, cumbersome, or unreliable compared w... While some users appreciate being able to manage reservations remotely, others say the mobile experience is weak, cumbersome, or unreliable compared with desktop use. This matters for hoteliers who need true on-the-go operations, and several reviews request a fuller mobile app or smoother mobile login and usability.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ CM and Simple Booking (Channel Manager) share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ CM offers 35 verified integration partners, while Simple Booking (Channel Manager) offers 59. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Simple Booking (Channel Manager) leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ CM: No. Simple Booking (Channel Manager): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 86 and Simple Booking has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property