The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 397 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Springer-Miller Systems shines .
ThinkReservations shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 397 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 395 |
After analyzing 397 verified reviews, Springer-Miller Systems users most value its , while ThinkReservations users highlight customer support, operational efficiency, data and reporting. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Data and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with OTAs
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Pricing and Fees
▾
|
|
|
−
Security Features
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #64 1 reviews | #4 145 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #70 0 reviews | #9 25 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #42 1 reviews | #6 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #5 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #59 1 reviews | #7 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #55 1 reviews | #7 70 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #7 24 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #11 8 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #53 2 reviews | #1 386 reviews |
| Europe | — | #57 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #32 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #32 0 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system is critical for your hotel's operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Springer Miller and ThinkReservations aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve very different segments and come with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Your decision should hinge on your property type, budget, and feature needs.
Springer Miller focuses on luxury resorts and complex operations, while ThinkReservations is designed for small to mid-sized properties, especially B&Bs, inns, and boutique hotels. Which system better aligns with your hotel's scope and your team's technical comfort?
Springer Miller’s SMS|Host is a veteran in luxury and resort markets, offering deep integration with comprehensive guest management and recreational features. ThinkReservations, on the other hand, provides a modern, user-friendly interface with a broad set of features aimed at small to midsize properties, emphasizing ease of use and automation.
Springer Miller’s review count is minimal (only 2 reviews), with no recent feedback, and a low overall rating of 2.75/5. It’s primarily used by resorts, with a very limited regional presence. In contrast, ThinkReservations boasts over 350 reviews, with recent feedback from 4 reviews in the last six months, and an impressive 4.88/5 rating. It’s favored by inns, boutique hotels, and small resorts across North America.
Does your property require complex resort-specific features or a straightforward PMS? Are you operating a small property in North America or a luxury resort globally? The answer will largely determine which product suits you better.
If your hotel is a small to medium-sized inn, bed & breakfast, boutique hotel, or vacation rental, ThinkReservations is the clear choice. Its intuitive interface, high user ratings, extensive feature set for automating operations, and recent positive reviews make it ideal for properties that value simplicity and efficiency.
Springer Miller’s system may appeal if your hotel is a large luxury resort or has complex, integrated operations like recreational activities and timeshare management. However, its poor ease of use ratings and limited recent reviews suggest it’s less suitable for hotels prioritizing staff onboarding and customer experience.
For hoteliers seeking rapid deployment, high reliability, and modern features, ThinkReservations is the more fitting choice. For luxury resorts needing tailored, high-end integrations, Springer Miller might still be relevant—but only if your team has the technical expertise and resources to handle its complexity.
ThinkReservations earns a 4.82/5 rating for ease of use, with reviewers praising its user-friendly interface, straightforward onboarding, and quick staff adoption. Its intuitive design minimizes training time and helps staff navigate operations smoothly, making it accessible even for less tech-savvy teams.
Springer Miller, with a 2.25/5 ease of use score, receives feedback pointing to its complicated configuration and difficult setup processes. Users find its interface outdated and challenging, particularly when managing rates, room moves, and reporting. Support and onboarding are less satisfactory, with reviews describing it as a foreign language to new staff.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers 39 specialized features such as channel management, integrated payment processing, online booking engine, guest messaging, automated night audit, and real-time reporting—features that no other system matches in this comparison. It also provides advanced automation like guest communication and upsell prompts, directly boosting revenue.
Springer Miller, however, provides core PMS functions tailored for high-end resorts, including recreation management, timeshare capabilities, and SpaSoft integration. But it lacks many modern automation features and the extensive online tools present in ThinkReservations.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations consistently receives high marks (4.82/5) for customer support, with many reviews emphasizing their responsiveness, availability, and helpful training materials. Customers appreciate the direct access to knowledgeable staff, often noting that support helps them quickly resolve issues.
Springer Miller’s support scores average at 3.75/5, with reviews citing frequent system downtime, complicated configuration, and a need for more personalized assistance. Users describe the support as less responsive and less helpful, especially when troubleshooting complex issues.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Springer Miller boasts 37 verified integrations, including high-end partners such as Interel, Inntopia, and HotelIQ, ideal for resorts with complex operational needs. ThinkReservations has 16 verified integrations, but these cover essential channels and tools like Expedia, Airbnb, TripAdvisor, and built-in payment solutions.
While Springer Miller offers more integrations tailored for large resorts, ThinkReservations has a strong selection of core OTA and payment integrations, making it sufficient for most small to mid-sized properties. The number of recent reviews and active integrations favor ThinkReservations.
Edge: Springer Miller.
ThinkReservations has an overwhelmingly higher rating (4.88/5) based on 356 reviews, with recent feedback showing high satisfaction across small properties, inns, and boutique hotels. Hotels in this segment praise its ease of use, automation, and support, often citing revenue increases and operational efficiencies.
Springer Miller’s limited review base (just 2 reviews, no recent feedback) results in a low score of 2.75/5. The few reviews focus on its complexity and difficulty, especially for smaller properties or teams without dedicated technical staff.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Springer Miller does not publicly disclose pricing, but it is known to be a premium solution with custom quotes, often expensive due to its enterprise nature. ThinkReservations charges a $500 monthly fee, with no implementation fees or hidden charges, making it transparent and predictable for small businesses.
Given the available data, ThinkReservations offers a more accessible pricing model suitable for small to mid-sized hotels. Springer Miller’s costs can be prohibitive unless your property is a large, high-end resort with complex needs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Springer Miller’s PMS is suited for large, complex resorts that need integrated recreational, spa, and timeshare management, and have the resources to handle its steep learning curve. Its limited recent reviews and low ease-of-use scores suggest it’s not ideal for most hotels seeking straightforward solutions.
ThinkReservations offers a highly rated, feature-rich platform that excels with small to mid-sized properties. Its ease of use, support, and recent reviews make it the clear choice for most hoteliers looking to improve efficiency, guest experience, and revenue.
If your hotel needs a simple, reliable, and modern property management system, go with ThinkReservations. If your property operates at a luxury resort scale with complex operational requirements and the resources to manage a sophisticated system, Springer Miller could be appropriate—if you’re prepared for its complexity.
In conclusion, for the majority of hotels evaluating these two options today, ThinkReservations stands out as the more dependable, user-friendly, and well-reviewed system. Springer Miller remains relevant for niche, high-end resorts with significant operational complexity but is less suited for everyday hotel management needs.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Springer Miller and ThinkReservations PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
What hoteliers love
Though already noted as excellent by many, a few reviews express the desire for additional support on weekends to better handle urgent inquiries.
ThinkReservations aids in streamlining operations through digital registration, night audits, and easy management of booking and check-in processes, a... ThinkReservations aids in streamlining operations through digital registration, night audits, and easy management of booking and check-in processes, allowing staff to focus more on guest interactions.
The system offers comprehensive data and reporting features, enabling hoteliers to make informed decisions on pricing, guest satisfaction, and strateg... The system offers comprehensive data and reporting features, enabling hoteliers to make informed decisions on pricing, guest satisfaction, and strategy planning.
Where hoteliers push back
Some reviews highlight issues with the pricing structure, including dissatisfaction with channel manager fees and the high price of features like Thin... Some reviews highlight issues with the pricing structure, including dissatisfaction with channel manager fees and the high price of features like ThinkMessenger.
Mandatory two-step authentication is a point of frustration for some users, who find it burdensome and wish for lower security settings.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Springer Miller and ThinkReservations PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Springer Miller offers 37 verified integration partners, while ThinkReservations PMS offers 16. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ThinkReservations PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 2.2/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Springer Miller: No. ThinkReservations PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Springer-Miller Systems has an HT Score of 0 and ThinkReservations has 89. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor