The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 152 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
M1 Intel shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Lead Scoring.
Tripleseat shines when it comes to user-friendliness — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Contact Management/CRM and PCI Compliant Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 152 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 20 | 132 |
After analyzing 152 verified reviews, M1 Intel users most value its , while Tripleseat users highlight user-friendliness, event and client management, account management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendliness
▾
|
|
|
+
Event and Client Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Account Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and Best Practices
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Group Reporting and Forecasting
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Sales Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 24 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 9 reviews | #2 88 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #10 2 reviews | #5 11 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 7 reviews | #2 83 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 1 reviews | #3 44 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 7 reviews | #6 36 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 3 reviews | #6 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 9 reviews | #2 120 reviews |
| Europe | — | #7 2 reviews |
Choosing between Matrix SMS by M1 Intel and Tripleseat hinges on your hotel’s sales management needs. Both products aim to streamline group bookings and lead management, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. M1 Intel is a newer, less-reviewed platform focused on sales automation, while Tripleseat boasts extensive reviews and a well-established reputation in hospitality. Which platform aligns better with your operational priorities?
Matrix SMS and Tripleseat both serve hotel sales teams, yet their core functions diverge. Matrix is designed as a sales management tool emphasizing lead tracking, deal management, and data control—built by hotel owners for speed and clarity. Tripleseat, on the other hand, integrates group booking, event management, and client communication into a unified platform. Do you need a dedicated sales CRM or a complete event management system?
Matrix’s advantages lie in its focus on pipeline management, with deep search functions, Kanban boards, and real-time reporting, making it ideal for sales teams seeking speed and transparency. Tripleseat excels at managing complex group bookings, automating proposals, and streamlining communication, which benefits hotels with high event volume. Are your primary needs streamlined sales or comprehensive event handling?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, sales-focused platform to improve lead conversion, go with Matrix SMS. Its high ease of use (rated 4.94/5 from 18 reviews) and strong value (5/5 ROI rating) make it suitable for properties prioritizing sales pipeline visibility. However, its limited feature set—only lead scoring—may restrict its scope for event management.
If your hotel requires a platform that manages both sales and complex group events, Tripleseat is the better fit. Its extensive feature set (12 unique features) including CRM, document management, eSignatures, and task management, supports comprehensive event workflows. With 125 reviews and a recent rating of 93.63/100, Tripleseat’s mature ecosystem and proven track record make it a safer choice for hotels with active group sales.
Matrix SMS receives a top ease of use rating of 4.94/5 based on 18 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and fast adoption by staff. Customers highlight that it feels "clean" and "straightforward" for managing leads and tracking deals, with minimal learning curve.
Tripleseat, rated 4.33/5 with 125 reviews, is also user-friendly but slightly less intuitive, especially for new users. Reviewers mention that onboarding support is good but that some features like report generation and group booking setup can be challenging initially. Edge: Matrix SMS.
Tripleseat offers a broader feature set—12 unique features compared to Matrix’s 1. Key functionalities exclusive to Tripleseat include contact management, client portals, task management, customizable proposals, contract handling, and integrated payments. Its features cater to complex event workflows, document customization, and team collaboration.
Matrix’s sole unique feature, lead scoring, enhances sales pipeline prioritization but falls short of Tripleseat’s comprehensive event management tools. For a hotel needing advanced group booking automation and client communication, Tripleseat clearly leads. Edge: Tripleseat.
Matrix’s customer support scores 4.89/5 from 18 reviews, with users describing the team as responsive, open to feedback, and proactive in development. Review snippets mention that support makes onboarding smooth and addresses issues quickly.
Tripleseat scores slightly lower at 4.54/5 from 125 reviews, though users still praise their onboarding and support team for being helpful and attentive. Some mention that support is responsive but that platform complexity occasionally leads to longer resolution times. Edge: Matrix SMS.
Tripleseat boasts 15 verified integrations, including popular hotel systems like WebRezPro, Stayntouch, Oracle Hospitality, and Stripe for payments. Its broader integration base supports seamless data sharing across platforms, especially in hospitality environments.
Matrix lacks verified partnerships, limiting its interoperability and requiring more manual workflows. If integrations are crucial, Tripleseat’s ecosystem makes it easier to connect with other hotel systems. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat’s review count (125) vastly exceeds Matrix’s (18), and recent reviews (last 6 months) favor Tripleseat’s rating of 93.63/100 over Matrix’s negligible rating of 0. This extensive recent feedback indicates a more proven, reliable platform.
Matrix’s newer, limited review base makes it difficult to assess long-term satisfaction, but the lack of recent reviews and the zero rating suggest limited ongoing user engagement. For hotels valuing community trust and verified feedback, Tripleseat is the clear favorite. Edge: Tripleseat.
Both products are priced at a base rate of $400 per month, with no freemium models or additional implementation fees reported. This flat pricing simplifies budgeting but may lack flexibility for smaller hotels or those seeking tiered options.
Since pricing is identical and no trial info is available, your decision should focus on feature fit and user experience rather than cost differences.
Not ideal if your hotel needs comprehensive event management, group booking automation, or client portals.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal group event volume or prefers a simple, sales-only CRM.
Matrix SMS by M1 Intel is a streamlined sales management system suited for hotels that want fast, clear lead tracking and data control. Its recent reviews and high user ratings underscore its ease of use and support, but it’s limited in features and integrations.
Tripleseat offers a mature, feature-rich platform that combines sales, event management, and client communication. Its large review base and extensive integrations make it a trusted choice for hotels with complex group sales needs.
If your hotel needs a simple, high-rated sales CRM, go with Matrix SMS. It excels in ease, support, and value. But if you require comprehensive event handling, custom proposals, and broad integrations, Tripleseat is the safer, more proven option.
In conclusion, choose Matrix SMS if your focus is on fast, effective lead management with minimal fuss. Opt for Tripleseat if you want a full-featured, reliable platform that supports all your group booking and sales operations—especially if you’re looking for proven customer satisfaction and a large, active user community.
Hotel Sales Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Matrix SMS and Tripleseat (Group Sales Management Platform) share 8 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Client Communication Portal | ||
| Contact Management/CRM | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
| Customizable BEO, Proposal and Contract Documents | ||
| Lead Forms | ||
| Lead Scoring | ||
| Task Management (Tasks & Reminders) |
Showing top differences. 1 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Tripleseat provides the best ROI of any system."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Tripleseat is frequently lauded for its intuitive and user-friendly platform which significantly enhances operational efficiency. It aids sales and ev... Tripleseat is frequently lauded for its intuitive and user-friendly platform which significantly enhances operational efficiency. It aids sales and event teams in managing client details, communication, and event planning seamlessly.
The software's event and client management capabilities, including organizing client details, proposals, and payment processing, are noted for their e... The software's event and client management capabilities, including organizing client details, proposals, and payment processing, are noted for their efficiency and ability to centralize information effectively.
Tripleseat's account management is praised for being receptive to feedback and proactive in improving their platform through client suggestions, foste... Tripleseat's account management is praised for being receptive to feedback and proactive in improving their platform through client suggestions, fostering a collaborative relationship.
Where hoteliers push back
Although Tripleseat is generally well-received, users report room for improvement in the areas of group reporting and event total revenue forecasting,... Although Tripleseat is generally well-received, users report room for improvement in the areas of group reporting and event total revenue forecasting, indicating a need for enhanced analytical tools.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Matrix SMS and Tripleseat (Group Sales Management Platform) share many core Hotel Sales Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Matrix SMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Tripleseat (Group Sales Management Platform) offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Matrix SMS leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Matrix SMS: No. Tripleseat (Group Sales Management Platform): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Sales Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. M1 Intel has an HT Score of 0 and Tripleseat has 93. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor