The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 114 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Bowo se distingue en matiere de amélioration de l'expérience client , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Mobile Checkin and Mobile Checkout.
Orana Software se distingue en ROI .
Notes comparees basees sur 114 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | From $400/mo |
| Avis verifies | 112 | 2 |
Apres analyse de 114 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Bowo apprecient surtout amélioration de l'expérience client, service client, personnalisation et personnalisation, tandis que ceux de Orana Software mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Amélioration de l'expérience client
▾
|
|
|
+
Service client
▾
|
|
|
+
Personnalisation et personnalisation
▾
|
|
|
+
Facilité d'utilisation du backend
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Applications pour clients d'hôtel pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 42 avis | #24 1 avis |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #5 51 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #6 15 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) | #13 2 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 56 avis | #29 2 avis |
| Luxe ▾ | #4 74 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #6 23 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #5 11 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #7 12 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 88 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique | #14 1 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient | #5 3 avis | — |
Choosing between Bowo - Guest App and Orana Stay hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and desired features. Both aim to streamline guest communication and enhance the guest experience, but their approaches and strengths differ markedly. Bowo offers a highly customizable, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, while Orana Stay provides a straightforward, AI-driven guest concierge solution. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize customizability and revenue features or simplicity and automation.
Bowo and Orana Stay both serve as digital guest engagement tools, yet they target different hotel types and operational priorities. Bowo is designed as a versatile guest app that centralizes multiple services, including online check-in, room service ordering, and upselling opportunities. Orana Stay, by contrast, acts more as an automated communication platform, emphasizing AI-driven guest interactions, bookings, and concierge-like features.
The key divergence lies in their feature sets: Bowo boasts 8 shared features plus 3 exclusive ones, such as mobile check-in, checkout, and room service ordering. Orana Stay, with only 6 shared features, emphasizes automated messaging, booking, and guidance. Bowo’s extensive integrations with 31 partners also give it a broader ecosystem, whereas Orana’s 6 integrations are fewer but potentially easier to manage. Both platforms aim to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, but Bowo’s richer feature set and higher review count (99 vs. 2 for Orana) suggest a more mature solution for hotels with complex needs.
Given the recency and volume of reviews, Bowo’s current data provides a more reliable picture of performance. Its reviews highlight high satisfaction with personalization, upselling, and ease of use, positioning it as a more comprehensive solution. Orana Stay’s lack of recent reviews limits confidence in its current capabilities, although it performs well in ease of use and support ratings.
So, which is better for your hotel? If you need a flexible, feature-heavy app with extensive integrations and proven hotel-focused functionalities, Bowo is the clear choice. If your priority is a simple, AI-powered guest communication tool without the need for complex features, Orana Stay might suffice—but be aware that recent review data favors Bowo.
If your hotel needs a customizable platform that can handle multiple guest services, upselling, and seamless integration with existing systems, go with Bowo. Its ability to connect with 31 partners and support features like mobile check-in, checkout, and room service makes it ideal for higher-tier properties and hotels seeking to elevate guest engagement through personalization and added revenue streams.
If your hotel’s primary goal is to automate guest interactions and provide a digital concierge that answers questions, facilitates bookings, and offers relevant recommendations with minimal setup, Orana Stay is the better fit. Its AI-driven approach can free your staff’s time and deliver a branded app experience for guests, especially for boutique hotels or smaller properties with simpler operational needs.
For hotels that value extensive guest-facing functionalities alongside direct revenue opportunities, Bowo’s feature set and high review count (99 reviews with recent feedback) make it the stronger choice. Conversely, if you prioritize ease of deployment and AI-driven automation without extensive customization, Orana Stay’s straightforward design can be appealing—though its limited recent reviews weaken confidence in current performance.
Bowo scores slightly below Orana Stay in ease of use ratings, with 4.87/5 compared to Orana’s perfect 5/5. Bowo’s onboarding process is rated 4.74/5 and includes a more complex setup due to its numerous features and integrations, which may require more staff training and configuration time. Its interface is praised for its modern presentation and customization options, but some reviews suggest navigation could be more intuitive.
Orana Stay, with a perfect 5/5 ease of use rating and onboarding, emphasizes simplicity and automation. Its straightforward AI-driven system and limited feature set mean your team can adopt it quickly with minimal training, making it especially suitable for properties seeking quick deployment with minimal fuss.
Edge: Orana Stay.
Bowo offers a total of 11 distinct features, including mobile check-in, mobile checkout, and room service ordering—features not present in Orana Stay. These enable more direct interaction with guests and revenue-generating opportunities, such as upselling through digital services.
Orana Stay provides 6 shared features focusing on AI-assisted communication, bookings, and guest guidance without the added functionalities of mobile check-in or ordering. While less feature-rich, its automation capabilities streamline guest interaction efficiently.
In terms of unique features, Bowo’s ability to enable mobile check-in, checkout, and room service orders positions it as a more comprehensive guest engagement platform. For properties that want direct control over services and revenue, Bowo’s feature set is the better choice.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo’s support scores 4.85/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, proactive attitude, and personalized assistance. Hoteliers appreciate the dedicated account managers and ongoing support that helps optimize the platform for their needs.
Orana Stay also garners a perfect 5/5 support rating, with reviewers emphasizing the ease of communication, especially due to the Australian-based developer team. However, the limited number of recent reviews makes it harder to assess current support quality at scale.
Given the volume of reviews and recent feedback, Bowo’s customer support appears slightly stronger and more proven in delivering timely, tailored assistance. Its high support score reinforces confidence in ongoing partnership and troubleshooting.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo boasts 31 verified integration partners, including major systems like apaleo, HiJiffy, Oracle Hospitality, and others. This extensive ecosystem allows your hotel to connect with PMS, booking engines, and other operational tools, enabling a more centralized management experience.
Orana Software has only 6 verified integrations, including Sirvoy, Guesty, and Cloudbeds. While sufficient for basic operations, this smaller network limits flexibility if your hotel relies on multiple third-party systems or complex workflows.
If integration breadth is essential for your operations, Bowo’s wider partner network provides a clear advantage. Its ability to connect with numerous platforms ensures your existing infrastructure can work cohesively.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo’s reviews, with 99 recent entries, reflect high satisfaction, especially among luxury and branded hotels. Its overall rating is 0/5, but this appears to be a placeholder; the critical takeaway is the high review count and positive comments on support, personalization, and revenue potential.
Orana Software, with only 2 reviews and a current rating of 0/5, offers limited feedback. The absence of recent reviews diminishes confidence that its support and features meet evolving hotel expectations.
Given the volume and recency of feedback, Bowo’s ratings demonstrate a more favorable and proven reputation among hoteliers. Its extensive reviews highlight consistent performance, especially in larger or upscale properties.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo’s base price is $600.00, with no mention of monthly fees, implementation costs, or trials, suggesting a straightforward flat rate. Its higher price reflects its broader features and integration capabilities.
Orana Stay’s base price is $400.00, also without ongoing fees or trials. While less expensive upfront, its narrower feature set and smaller integration network might limit its value for larger or more complex hotels.
Pricing alone favors Orana’s lower entry point, but Bowo’s comprehensive capabilities justify its higher cost for hotels needing more extensive features and integrations. Your decision should consider the value derived from these features relative to your property size and operational complexity.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal service offerings, or if you prefer a simple, plug-and-play solution without extensive setup.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced features like mobile check-in, checkout, or detailed upselling capabilities.
Bowo and Orana Stay serve different hotel needs. Bowo is a feature-rich, highly customizable platform suited for larger or upscale hotels seeking to boost revenue and operational efficiency. Orana Stay offers a streamlined, AI-powered guest communication app ideal for smaller hotels or those prioritizing simplicity and automation.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive system that integrates with many partners, supports revenue-generating features, and offers extensive customization, Bowo is the clear choice. If you prefer a straightforward, branded app that automates guest interactions with minimal setup, Orana Stay may meet your needs—though recent data favors Bowo’s proven track record.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking for a reliable, well-supported, and feature-rich guest app, Bowo’s current review volume, recent feedback, and integration network make it the stronger option.
La tarification des Applications pour clients d'hôtel est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $400/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Bowo - Guest App et Orana Stay partagent 8 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Commande de service en chambre | ||
| Enregistrement mobile | ||
| Paiement mobile |
Nous avons analyse 2 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"The application helps me grow all the hotel's secondary points of sale, whether it's the SPA, catering, or even concierge activities. It also enables us to incorporate additional e..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We've managed to build a guest journey that's very intuitive and quite extraordinary."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
De nombreux avis soulignent la manière dont Bowo améliore l'expérience globale des clients en fournissant toutes les informations sur l'hôtel en un se... De nombreux avis soulignent la manière dont Bowo améliore l'expérience globale des clients en fournissant toutes les informations sur l'hôtel en un seul endroit, ce qui permet aux clients d'accéder et de réserver facilement des services directement via la tablette placée dans leur chambre.
Le service client de Bowo est salué pour sa réactivité et son aide précieuse. Les utilisateurs apprécient les gestionnaires de compte dédiés, toujours... Le service client de Bowo est salué pour sa réactivité et son aide précieuse. Les utilisateurs apprécient les gestionnaires de compte dédiés, toujours prêts à les aider en cas de problème ou de personnalisation.
Les avis mentionnent le haut degré de personnalisation disponible sur la plateforme, permettant aux hôtels d'adapter l'application à l'apparence et à... Les avis mentionnent le haut degré de personnalisation disponible sur la plateforme, permettant aux hôtels d'adapter l'application à l'apparence et à la convivialité de leur marque, ce qui améliore l'expérience client.
Mieux classe pour
Fonctionnalites uniques
Cela depend de vos besoins. Bowo - Guest App et Orana Stay partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Hotel Guest Apps de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Bowo - Guest App propose 31 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Orana Stay en propose 6. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Orana Stay est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 5.0/5 contre 4.9/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Bowo - Guest App : Non. Orana Stay : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Hotel Guest Apps proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Bowo a un HT Score de 39 et Orana Software a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits