The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
HOTELTIME se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements brand (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Payment processing and Guest CRM.
CEI Europe se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 549 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 549 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 549 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de HOTELTIME apprecient surtout user interface and learning curve, assistance technique, reporting and analytics, tandis que ceux de CEI Europe mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Assistance technique
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Optimisation mobile
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #5 219 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #3 238 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #2 46 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #8 7 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #3 241 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #4 143 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #4 49 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord | #52 4 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #5 111 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #1 21 avis | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical decision for your hotel, impacting daily operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Quohotel PMS by CEI Europe both aim to streamline your hotel’s workflows, but they differ significantly in scope, user feedback, and market presence. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a larger user base, while CEI Europe’s offering appears less detailed and has fewer reviews. How do these differences influence your decision?
HotelTime PMS stands out with a high HTR Score of over 91, a 4.83/5 rating based on 433 reviews, and recent reviews from the last six months bolster its relevance. Conversely, Quohotel PMS has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction.
HotelTime is praised for its ease of use, with a 4.66/5 rating and a dedicated support team, whereas CEI Europe’s support and user feedback are not documented. HotelTime’s extensive feature set—over 50 unique functionalities—supports diverse hotel needs, including advanced revenue management, CRM, and integrated POS. Quohotel’s capabilities are less specified, and the lack of detailed features or customer feedback makes HotelTime the more tangible choice for reliability and proven performance. Do you prioritize a proven, well-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable PMS suitable for properties of all sizes—especially those requiring extensive integrations, revenue management, or multi-department functionality—HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its large user base across Europe, Middle East, Asia Pacific, and Africa, along with a robust partner network, demonstrates its versatility.
If your hotel is a small operation or startup seeking a simple, straightforward solution with minimal complexity, Quohotel PMS could suffice, though its limited public information and lack of recent reviews make it less reliable for critical decision-making. Given the data, HotelTime is better suited for established hotels aiming for comprehensive operational control.
HotelTime PMS boasts a user rating of 4.66/5, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users appreciate that its design allows staff to adapt quickly, with some noting that initial module setup can be complex but manageable with proper training.
In contrast, CEI Europe offers no available ratings or user feedback regarding ease of use, leaving uncertainty about its user experience. The lack of reviews and detailed UI information favors HotelTime, which has a proven track record of user-friendly operation. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s feature list exceeds 50, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, online check-in, mobile app, revenue management, and more. These features are designed to cover all aspects of hotel operations and revenue optimization.
Quohotel’s feature set is not explicitly detailed in available data, making it difficult to compare directly. HotelTime’s extensive, proven functionalities give it a significant advantage. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s customer support is rated at 4.73/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and dedicated assistance. Hoteliers report that support staff go above and beyond, including personalized onboarding and prompt issue resolution.
CEI Europe has no visible customer support ratings or recent testimonials, making it impossible to assess support quality. With a strong support reputation and recent positive reviews, HotelTime clearly offers more reliable customer care. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major systems like Duetto, Profitroom, and STR, enabling seamless data flow across booking engines, POS, revenue management, and more. Its extensive integrations support complex, multi-system hotel environments.
CEI Europe has only one verified partner listed, significantly limiting its integration capacity. For hotels seeking flexibility and a broad ecosystem of connected tools, HotelTime’s integration count is a decisive advantage. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime has a strong reputation, with a 4.83/5 overall rating from 433 reviews, including recent feedback from 27 users in the last six months. Hotels across various segments—resorts, boutique hotels, city center properties—rate it highly for functionality and support.
CEI Europe lacks public ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge hoteliers’ satisfaction. Given the more than 400 recent reviews, HotelTime’s higher rating and sustained positive feedback clearly make it the preferred choice. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s pricing begins at $600 per month, with no freemium or trial options mentioned. Quohotel’s pricing details are not publicly available, making it difficult to compare direct costs.
Without transparent pricing for Quohotel, HotelTime’s clear fee structure and known value delivery favor it for budget planning. If cost transparency is a priority, HotelTime clearly states its price.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
HotelTime PMS offers a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, a large and satisfied user base, and recent, positive reviews. Its high ratings and transparent pricing make it a clear choice for hotels seeking reliability and scalability.
Quohotel PMS, while possibly suitable for small, straightforward hotels, lacks publicly available feedback, recent reviews, and detailed features. Its limited integration options and unclear support reputation make it a less advisable choice for larger or more complex properties.
If your hotel values a well-supported, comprehensive PMS that can handle your current and future needs, HotelTime PMS is the recommended solution. For smaller properties with very basic requirements, Quohotel might suffice, but caution is advised due to the limited information available.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
CEI Europe | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, HotelTime PMS et Quohotel PMS partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
CEI Europe |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| CRS intégré | ||
| Suivi des revenus annexes | ||
| Traitement des paiements | ||
| Vue Calendrier | ||
| Épopée |
Affichage des principales differences. 39 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance t... Bien que la réactivité et l'efficacité de l'équipe d'assistance soient appréciées, certains avis suggèrent que l'extension des horaires d'assistance technique améliorerait encore l'expérience utilisateur, en garantissant une assistance permanente, notamment pour les utilisateurs internationaux.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. HotelTime PMS et Quohotel PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. HotelTime PMS propose 58 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Quohotel PMS en propose 1. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. HotelTime PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
HotelTime PMS : Non. Quohotel PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. HOTELTIME a un HT Score de 92 et CEI Europe a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits