The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Uplisting se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de Uplisting mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
You’re choosing between Mews PMS and Uplisting for your hotel’s property management needs. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they serve different segments and offer contrasting features. Mews, with its extensive reviews and recent data, is the clear leader, demonstrating a proven track record in hospitality.
Are you looking for a versatile, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem, or a specialized tool tailored for short-term rentals? The choice hinges on your property type and operational priorities.
Mews is a cloud-based platform designed for a wide range of accommodations, including boutique hotels, resorts, and branded properties. It offers over 750 reviews—98 in the last six months—indicating active, recent user engagement. Its overall rating of 4.62/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend highlight strong hotelier satisfaction.
Uplisting, on the other hand, caters primarily to short-term rental operators and has no publicly available reviews or ratings. Its focus is narrower, lacking the extensive user feedback and proven track record that Mews demonstrates. Given the recent surge of positive reviews for Mews, it clearly has the more established reputation.
Does Uplisting’s niche focus make it suitable for small rental operations? The answer is no; without recent reviews or ratings, its reliability remains unverified compared to Mews’ proven performance in the hotel industry.
If your hotel needs a robust, adaptable property management system that can handle diverse property types, automation, and integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive feature set and unmatched third-party ecosystem are ideal for mid-sized to large hotels seeking scalability.
If your operation is purely short-term rentals or vacation homes, and you prioritize simplicity over advanced features, Uplisting might seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews and a small user base make it a less reliable choice for hotels that require proven, comprehensive PMS capabilities.
Ultimately, for hotels seeking a reliable, enterprise-grade system with proven support and a large ecosystem, Mews is the better option. Uplisting’s limited data and niche focus make it less suitable for traditional hotel operations.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with a modern, intuitive interface praised by 758 reviewers, including many recent ones. Users report quick onboarding—averaging 4.39/5—and highlight how staff adopt the system smoothly, citing features like mobile apps and user-friendly dashboards.
Uplisting offers a simpler, less feature-rich interface tailored to short-term rental hosts, but lacks extensive user ratings or detailed feedback on usability. Its minimal public data makes it difficult to assess how easy it is for teams to adopt at scale.
Edge: Mews.
Mews provides over 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-language, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, direct billing, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Its 336 verified integrations also enable extensive customization.
Uplisting offers core management functions suitable for small rental portfolios but lacks the breadth of features found in Mews. It does not have a comparable ecosystem or advanced modules like revenue management, guest profiles, or automation tools.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and availability, including 98 recent reviews in the last six months. Users appreciate the proactive onboarding, quick bug resolutions, and comprehensive assistance.
Uplisting offers no public support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge its support quality. Its small user base suggests limited support resources, especially compared to Mews’ established global presence.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like Duve, PriceLabs, Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its extensive API and marketplace enable hoteliers to connect a wide array of third-party tools.
Uplisting has only 2 verified partners, which severely limits its integration capabilities. For hotels relying on a broad tech ecosystem, this stark difference makes Mews the clear leader.
Edge: Mews.
Mews, with over 750 reviews—98 recent—has a 4.62/5 overall rating, with 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotelier feedback covers diverse segments, including boutique, city center, and hostels, all expressing satisfaction with its functionality and support.
Uplisting lacks publicly available reviews or ratings, preventing a similar assessment. Its unverified reputation means hotel managers cannot confidently rely on its performance or support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews costs a base fee of $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. Its pricing model is transparent, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Uplisting offers no publicly disclosed pricing, but as a smaller platform, it likely charges less for basic management. However, the lack of clear pricing details hampers direct comparison and confidence.
Overall, Mews’ transparent pricing aligns with its proven, extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if your operation is purely short-term rentals with minimal complexity or if you prioritize a niche platform.
Not ideal if you manage diverse properties, need advanced features, or require proven hotel-specific support and scalability.
Mews excels as a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and active hotelier support. Its recent reviews and high ratings make it the trusted choice for most hotel operations, especially those seeking growth and scalability.
Uplisting may appeal to small, niche rental operators prioritizing simplicity, but its lack of recent reviews and small ecosystem make it less reliable for hotels. For properties that need a dependable, comprehensive solution, Mews remains the clear winner.
If your hotel requires a proven, adaptable PMS with robust features, support, and integrations—choose Mews. If you operate a small vacation rental and prefer a minimal management system, Uplisting could suffice, but be cautious about its unverified support and capabilities.
Edge: Mews.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
Uplisting | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et Uplisting partagent 0 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| CRM invité | ||
| Module de gestion des revenus | ||
| Moteur de réservation | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 47 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et Uplisting partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 336 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que Uplisting en propose 2. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. Uplisting : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 100 et Uplisting a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits