The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Nous avons analyse 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers, compare les fonctionnalites, les tarifs et des etudes de cas reelles pour identifier les points forts de chaque plateforme. Le bon choix depend du type de votre etablissement et de vos priorites :
Mews se distingue en ease of use and customer support — en particulier pour les etablissements independent (4.9/5) , avec des fonctionnalites exclusives comme Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
VIPS se distingue .
Notes comparees basees sur 887 avis verifies d'hoteliers sur HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilite de recommandation |
|
|
| Facilite d'utilisation |
|
|
| Support client |
|
|
| Rapport qualite-prix |
|
|
| Prix de depart | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| Avis verifies | 887 | 0 |
Apres analyse de 887 avis verifies, les utilisateurs de Mews apprecient surtout ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, tandis que ceux de VIPS mettent en avant . Cliquez sur un theme pour voir ce que disent les evaluateurs.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Avantages | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Intégration et soutien
▾
|
|
| Inconvenients | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Rapports et analyses
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Comment chaque produit se classe parmi les fournisseurs Systèmes de gestion immobilière pour differentes tailles d'etablissements, types et regions — base sur les avis verifies d'hoteliers dans chaque segment.
Par taille d'hotel
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Petit (10-24 chambres) ▾ | #3 329 avis | — |
| Moyen (25-74 chambres) ▾ | #1 397 avis | — |
| Grand (75-199 chambres) ▾ | #3 45 avis | — |
| Tres grand (200+ chambres) ▾ | #3 49 avis | — |
Par type d'etablissement
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avis | — |
| Luxe ▾ | #5 220 avis | — |
| Enseigne / Chaine ▾ | #2 170 avis | — |
| Sejour prolonge ▾ | #1 130 avis | — |
Par region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Amerique du Nord ▾ | #8 106 avis | — |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 avis | — |
| Asie-Pacifique ▾ | #10 17 avis | — |
| Moyen-Orient ▾ | #28 8 avis | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to find a solution that streamlines operations, improves guest experiences, and offers robust integrations. Both Mews PMS and VIPS PMS aim to meet these needs, but they differ significantly in maturity, user feedback, and ecosystem support. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth plans.
Mews PMS boasts a proven track record with thousands of reviews, high user ratings, and recent positive feedback, making it the more reliable choice for modern hoteliers. VIPS PMS, while offering a broad feature set, lacks recent reviews or a large user base, which diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Mews PMS is the clear leader based on review volume, recent user experiences, and a comprehensive feature set that appeals to a broad spectrum of hotels. Its 758 reviews and 98 recent ones in the last six months demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support. Meanwhile, VIPS PMS has no recent reviews or user ratings available, making it difficult to assess its current effectiveness.
If your hotel values proven stability, extensive ecosystem integrations, and a platform trusted by thousands of properties, Mews is the better choice. For hotels seeking a less proven but potentially adaptable solution, VIPS may be worth exploring, but its lack of recent feedback is a concern.
Both Mews and VIPS aim to automate and simplify hotel operations, but Mews’s established presence provides a more reliable foundation supported by hundreds of reviews and high ratings. Mews excels in streamlining reservations, billing, and guest communication, with a focus on modern, cloud-native hospitality.
VIPS, on the other hand, claims to be an all-in-one, modular system designed to handle bookings, communications, meetings, and self-service check-ins, but lacks recent user feedback to verify its performance. Do you want a platform with recent, proven performance, or are you comfortable testing a less documented solution?
If your hotel needs a mature, widely adopted platform with proven reliability and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its user base spans boutique hotels, hostels, and larger properties, with a 4.62/5 overall rating backed by 758 reviews and a recent influx of feedback.
Choose VIPS if you prefer an all-in-one, modular solution that promises flexibility for managing bookings, meetings, and self-service options. However, given the lack of recent reviews and only 11 verified partners, VIPS’s current performance remains uncertain for most hoteliers.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile app. Many mention how staff adoption is smooth, with support teams offering helpful onboarding, making training less burdensome.
VIPS offers a modern interface with a broad feature set, but lacks recent user feedback to confirm usability and onboarding experience. Without recent reviews, assessing its ease of use remains speculative.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews offers 45 shared features with other PMS solutions and 14 features exclusive to it, such as multi-lingual support, guest CRM, integrated ID scanner, online checkout, and SOC2 compliance. Its marketplace boasts over 1,000 integrations, covering various operational needs.
VIPS provides a broad feature set including online bookings, guest communications, and self-service check-ins but has no unique features documented outside its core offerings. Currently, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and unique features give it an edge.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with many reviews praising the professionalism, responsiveness, and helpful onboarding assistance. Users note that issues are addressed swiftly, though some mention occasional bugs, which are typically resolved quickly.
VIPS offers no recent reviews or detailed support ratings, which makes evaluating their support quality impossible. Given Mews’s documented support strengths, it remains the more dependable choice.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews has 336 verified integration partners, including major players like SiteMinder, RevControl, and Orange Hotel Marketing, enabling extensive customization. Its marketplace offers a broad range of third-party tools for revenue management, guest engagement, and operations.
VIPS has only 11 verified partners, including some overlaps with Mews (RevControl, SiteMinder), but fewer options overall. For scalable, flexible integrations, Mews’s ecosystem is clearly superior.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s reviews consistently highlight its ease of use, reliability, and support, resulting in an overall rating of 4.62/5 with 93% likelihood to recommend. It is favored across property types, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and independent hotels.
VIPS has no recent or substantial reviews, so hotel ratings cannot be confidently assessed. Based on available data, Mews’s user ratings are significantly higher and more recent.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or per-room charges, offering transparent and enterprise-grade pricing. VIPS charges $800 per month, also without additional fees but with less transparency about optional costs.
While both are similar, Mews’s larger ecosystem and proven ROI justify its slightly higher price point for most hotels. The decision should consider value and support quality rather than price alone.
Mews is a mature, extensively reviewed PMS platform with proven reliability, boasting a 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, and a rich ecosystem of integrations. Its focus on automation, guest experience, and scalability makes it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, especially those looking to grow or modernize.
VIPS offers a broad, modular solution with potential flexibility, but the absence of recent reviews and limited partner network raise concerns about current performance and support. If stability and proven results matter most, Mews is the clear choice.
For hotels needing a trusted, fast-growing platform with a strong community, Mews delivers on expectations. If your hotel prefers a newer, flexible approach and is willing to test an emerging system, VIPS may be worth consideration—but proceed cautiously.
La tarification des Systèmes de gestion immobilière est rarement simple. Voici ce que nous savons a partir des donnees tarifaires publiques de chaque fournisseur. Demandez toujours un devis personnalise pour la taille de votre etablissement.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
Selon la base de donnees produits de HTR, Mews PMS et VIPS PMS partagent 45 fonctionnalites. Voici les differences cles — les fonctionnalites que l'un possede et que l'autre n'a pas.
| Fonctionnalite |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Application mobile | ||
| CRM invité | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multi-devise | ||
| Multilingue | ||
| Profils d'invités |
Affichage des principales differences. 2 fonctionnalites supplementaires different entre ces produits.
Nous avons analyse 8 etudes de cas verifiees pour comparer ce que les hotels obtiennent reellement avec chaque plateforme sur quatre objectifs commerciaux cles.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Aucune etude de cas publiee pour cet objectif pour le moment.
Ce que les hoteliers apprecient
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Les points de friction pour les hoteliers
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting pl... Bien que Mews offre des fonctionnalités de reporting et d'analyse performantes, plusieurs avis soulignent le besoin de fonctionnalités de reporting plus personnalisables et flexibles. Les utilisateurs souhaitent des analyses de données plus fines, notamment en matière de réservations et de revenus.
Fonctionnalites uniques
Ou les notes divergent le plus
Cela depend de vos besoins. Mews PMS et VIPS PMS partagent de nombreuses fonctionnalites Property Management Systems de base, mais chacun a des capacites uniques. Mews PMS propose 336 partenaires d'integration verifies, tandis que VIPS PMS en propose 11. Consultez la comparaison des fonctionnalites ci-dessus pour voir les differences avant de changer.
Les petits hotels devraient privilegier la facilite d'utilisation et une mise en service rapide. Mews PMS est en tete pour la facilite d'utilisation avec 4.7/5 contre 0.0/5. Recherchez une tarification transparente et une option d'essai ou de demonstration. Filtrez les avis sur chaque page produit par taille d'etablissement pour lire les retours d'hotels similaires au votre.
Mews PMS : Non. VIPS PMS : Non. Aucun des deux produits ne propose actuellement d'offre gratuite. La plupart des fournisseurs Property Management Systems proposent des demonstrations ou des essais — demandez-en un a chacun pour evaluer avant de vous engager.
Le HT Score est un classement composite qui prend en compte 4 groupes de criteres et plus d'une douzaine de variables pour aider les hoteliers a comparer objectivement les produits technologiques hoteliers. Mews a un HT Score de 99 et VIPS a 0. Voici comment le score est calcule.
| Groupe de criteres | Ponderation | Ce qu'il mesure |
|---|---|---|
| Notes et avis clients |
|
A quel point les utilisateurs recommandent-ils ce produit ? Score des notes, Volume d'avis, Part de voix, Profondeur des avis, Recence des avis, Etudes de cas ▾ Le facteur le plus fortement pondere. Analyse les notes de satisfaction moyennes (probabilite de recommandation, facilite d'utilisation, support, ROI), le nombre total d'avis par rapport aux pairs de la categorie, la recence des avis (au moins 20 avis sur les 6 derniers mois) et la part de voix parmi les clients hoteliers uniques pour detecter les biais de selection. |
| Ecosysteme partenaire |
|
A quel point les partenaires technologiques recommandent-ils cette entreprise ? Recommandations des partenaires, Nombre d'integrations, Qualite des integrations ▾ Evalue les recommandations des partenaires comme des votes de confiance d'experts, le nombre d'integrations verifiees et la qualite de l'ecosysteme — la moyenne des HT Scores des partenaires d'integration. Les produits avec des ecosystemes d'integration de meilleure qualite sont plus susceptibles de fournir un ensemble technologique connecte. |
| Orientation client |
|
A quel point cette organisation est-elle orientee client ? Support certifie, Regularite des avis, Completude du profil ▾ Evalue si l'entreprise a obtenu la certification HTR de support client, maintient une collecte d'avis reguliere dans le temps (un indicateur de culture axee sur le feedback) et tient a jour les profils produits avec les fonctionnalites, captures d'ecran, tarifs et caracteristiques. |
| Portee, perennite et ressources |
|
Quelle est l'etendue de la portee et des ressources de cette entreprise ? Portee geographique, Perennite, Ressources de l'entreprise, Score de tendance ▾ Mesure la presence mondiale (pays et regions desservis), les annees d'activite comme indicateur de stabilite, les effectifs comme indicateur de ressources, et un score de tendance base sur les demandes d'acheteurs, les avis, les recommandations de partenaires et l'activite presse des douze derniers mois. |
Les notes et avis clients sont de loin le facteur le plus important dans l'algorithme du HT Score. HTR n'accepte aucun paiement pour un meilleur classement. Tous les avis sont verifies — seuls les professionnels du secteur hotelier avec des affiliations confirmees peuvent soumettre des notes. Voir la methodologie complete du HT Score →
Conseiller en recommandations de produits