The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 71 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines .
MeetingPackage shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) .
Side-by-side ratings based on 71 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 9 | 62 |
After analyzing 71 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its , while MeetingPackage users highlight customer support and partnership mindset, continuous product innovation and roadmap responsiveness, proposal automation and rfp efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer support and partnership mindset
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous product innovation and roadmap responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Proposal automation and RFP efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Online booking and booking engine performance
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Release management and change communication issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Bugs and product stability
▾
|
|
|
−
Administration and permission controls
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among RFPs & Proposal Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #9 0 reviews | #3 7 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #10 4 reviews | #3 20 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 2 reviews | #3 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #7 1 reviews | #2 15 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 4 reviews | #2 23 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 4 reviews | #4 10 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 8 reviews | #2 36 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #3 1 reviews | #2 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 5 reviews | #3 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #9 2 reviews | #2 44 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #7 0 reviews | #4 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #1 3 reviews |
Choosing between Amadeus and MeetingPackage for your hotel’s RFP and proposal management needs hinges on your specific operational priorities. Both solutions aim to streamline proposal generation and sales processes, but they differ significantly in execution, user experience, and market reception. Amadeus is a more established platform with a focus on integration within a broad sales and catering ecosystem, while MeetingPackage emphasizes simplicity, ease of use, and channel management. Does your team need a robust, enterprise-grade system, or a more user-friendly, flexible platform?
Both Amadeus and MeetingPackage address the core challenge of converting inquiries into bookings through streamlined proposal management. However, Amadeus’s platform is designed to generate dynamic proposals directly from its sales and catering software, reducing manual entry and accelerating sales cycles. MeetingPackage, on the other hand, replaces static PDFs with interactive proposals, focusing on engaging clients early and providing instant booking capabilities. Given that Amadeus’s overall rating and recent reviews are near zero, is a proven, more widely adopted solution more reliable for your hotel’s future?
If your hotel requires a simple, quick-to-implement system with high usability and excellent support, MeetingPackage is the better fit. Its recent reviews highlight a 4.86/5 support rating and 4.74/5 onboarding score, along with a 95% likelihood to recommend, primarily from small to mid-sized properties. Conversely, if your hotel is part of a larger chain or needs a solution integrated into an existing sales and catering ecosystem, Amadeus’s extensive 104 verified partners and 9 review count—though with a poor overall rating—make it less compelling unless you can tolerate its limited recent feedback.
MeetingPackage’s UI scores 4.6/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface and straightforward proposal creation process. Support and onboarding are also rated highly, with users describing it as easy for staff to adopt and manage. Amadeus’s interface scores 3.39/5 and has received criticism for its outdated and complex system, with some users mentioning the need for support staff to check Google for solutions. Edge: MeetingPackage.
Amadeus offers zero unique features outside its standard proposal management, with 11 shared features across both platforms. MeetingPackage boasts a broader feature set, including multi-property management, channel distribution, and customizable proposals, with frequent updates on new features. However, both platforms are missing advanced functionalities like multi-day booking support and detailed analytics, which are common user requests. Edge: MeetingPackage.
Customer support ratings reveal a stark difference: Amadeus scores 2.72/5, with reviews citing slow responses and unhelpful support, including quotes like “almost every time I call support the tech says let me check Google.” MeetingPackage’s support scores 4.86/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive communication. Edge: MeetingPackage.
Amadeus’s integration ecosystem is extensive, with 104 verified partners, including major names like Oracle Hospitality and Mews. MeetingPackage integrates with only 14 verified partners, such as Stripe and IVvy, but shares key solutions like Amadeus and Oracle. Despite its smaller partner count, MeetingPackage’s integrations are well-suited for small to mid-sized venues, while Amadeus’s breadth suits larger, more complex environments. Edge: Amadeus.
Recent reviews emphasize MeetingPackage’s high satisfaction, with a 9.44/10 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend, especially among small and boutique hotels. Amadeus’s reviews are scarce, with an overall rating of 1.88/5, and many users citing poor performance and support. Larger properties and chains tend to favor Amadeus’s ecosystem, but the recent data clearly favors MeetingPackage’s user experience. Edge: MeetingPackage.
Amadeus charges a $1,000 base price, with no mention of trial options or monthly fees, indicating a potential upfront or enterprise licensing approach. MeetingPackage offers a $200 monthly fee with a 30-day free trial, making it more accessible for smaller hotels and venues. The total cost difference is significant, favoring MeetingPackage for budget-conscious properties seeking quick deployment.
The core difference lies in their target user base and platform maturity. Amadeus offers a more complex, integrated solution suited to large, corporate environments, but with poor recent reviews and support issues. MeetingPackage provides a straightforward, well-supported, and highly rated platform ideal for smaller hotels and venues, with a strong recent review profile.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel is part of a large chain, needs a deeply integrated sales ecosystem, and can manage its complexity. Opt for MeetingPackage if you want a user-friendly, cost-effective, and reliable proposal management solution that delivers quick results and high satisfaction.
In conclusion, for most hotels actively seeking a dependable, modern proposal platform today, MeetingPackage stands out as the more trusted choice, supported by recent reviews and a high NPS score. However, larger properties with complex needs should consider Amadeus if they can navigate its current limitations and support challenges.
RFPs & Proposal Management Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $200/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Proposals, Contracts & Signatures
|
|
|
| Digital Signatures | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Templates Library | ||
|
▾
Online Bookings
|
|
|
| Real-time live availability | ||
| Website Booking Engine | ||
|
▾
Payments & Invoicing
|
|
|
| Online payments | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| Templates Library | ||
| Content & File Management | ||
|
▾
CRM & Messaging
|
|
|
| Response Management | ||
| Team Collaboration | ||
| Read Receipts & Alerts | ||
| Templates Library | ||
| Automated Responses | ||
|
▾
Notifications
|
|
|
| Read Receipts & Alerts | ||
| Team Collaboration |
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest asset of MeetingPackage is automation. Our small team has limited time to answer every RFP, and this online rate and availability tool makes rate shopping as straightfo..."
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Many reviewers describe the team as highly responsive, supportive, and solution-oriented. They value proactive help, open communication, and the sense... Many reviewers describe the team as highly responsive, supportive, and solution-oriented. They value proactive help, open communication, and the sense that MeetingPackage acts more like a partner than a vendor, which increases confidence in the product.
A major theme is MeetingPackage's pace of innovation and willingness to keep evolving with hotel needs. Reviewers appreciate frequent new capabilities... A major theme is MeetingPackage's pace of innovation and willingness to keep evolving with hotel needs. Reviewers appreciate frequent new capabilities, a flexible roadmap, and co-building with customers, seeing this as a strategic advantage for long-term value.
Users frequently say MeetingPackage reduces manual work in group and meeting sales by automating proposal creation and enquiry handling. Reviewers not... Users frequently say MeetingPackage reduces manual work in group and meeting sales by automating proposal creation and enquiry handling. Reviewers note it saves time, improves response speed, and helps teams process more leads efficiently, which supports stronger commercial performance.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users raise concerns about the pace of releases and the need for clearer communication around changes. They want better visibility into upcoming... Some users raise concerns about the pace of releases and the need for clearer communication around changes. They want better visibility into upcoming releases, stronger testing, and more disciplined change management to avoid operational disruption.
A smaller but important set of reviews mentions bugs and the need for fixes. These comments suggest the product is valuable but can still be hindered... A smaller but important set of reviews mentions bugs and the need for fixes. These comments suggest the product is valuable but can still be hindered by issues that slow adoption or require support intervention.
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal) and MeetingPackage Channel Manager and Web Proposal share many core RFPs & Proposal Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal) offers 107 verified integration partners, while MeetingPackage Channel Manager and Web Proposal offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MeetingPackage Channel Manager and Web Proposal leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 3.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus (Sales & Event Management - eProposal): No. MeetingPackage Channel Manager and Web Proposal: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most RFPs & Proposal Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and MeetingPackage has 97. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property