The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 55 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
apaleo GmbH shines when it comes to frequent updates and community engagement , with exclusive features like SOC2 Complaint and Automated Assignments.
Noovy shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 55 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 25 |
After analyzing 55 verified reviews, apaleo GmbH users most value its frequent updates and community engagement, customization and flexibility, open api and integration, while Noovy users highlight ease of use, customer service, automated payment processing. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Frequent Updates and Community Engagement
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
+
Open API and Integration
▾
|
+
Automated Payment Processing
▾
|
|
+
App Store and Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
+
Direct OTAs Integration
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
−
Design
▾
|
|
−
Group and Booking Management
▾
|
−
Reporting Tools
▾
|
|
−
Translation Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #42 7 reviews | #39 11 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #27 19 reviews | #38 12 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #41 1 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #34 14 reviews | #38 14 reviews |
| Luxury | #43 4 reviews | #54 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #40 4 reviews | #52 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #38 2 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #18 26 reviews | #22 23 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #16 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for streamlining your hotel’s operations, enhancing guest experience, and reducing costs. Both Apaleo Open PMS and Noovy PMS aim to solve these challenges but diverge significantly in terms of reviews, features, and focus. Apaleo offers extensive customization and integration options tailored for larger hotel groups or those with complex needs, while Noovy provides an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform ideal for independent hotels. Which aligns best with your hotel’s needs?
Apaleo and Noovy approach hotel management from different angles. Apaleo shines with its open API, enabling hotels to build customized tech stacks, integrating third-party apps, and scaling across multiple properties. Noovy, on the other hand, emphasizes simplicity and affordability, bundling core functionalities like booking, PMS, and channel management into one platform designed for ease and speed.
With more recent reviews and a higher HT Score (77.5 vs 71.1), Apaleo clearly has more current user feedback, especially from larger properties or groups seeking extensive customization. Noovy’s higher overall rating (5/5 vs 0/5) reflects its strong appeal to small and independent hotels prioritizing straightforward operation. Are you looking for a flexible, scalable solution or a simple, cost-effective platform?
If your hotel needs a highly adaptable platform that can integrate with a broad range of third-party tools, go with Apaleo. Its API-first approach and extensive feature set make it suitable for hotel groups aiming for a tailored tech ecosystem. Conversely, if your team wants an all-in-one solution that minimizes setup time, costs less, and offers robust basic functionalities, Noovy is the better fit.
For hotels focused on growth, multi-property management, or technical customization, Apaleo’s 120 verified integrations and open architecture are decisive advantages. If simplicity, affordability, and rapid onboarding matter most, Noovy’s straightforward platform and cost-per-room model are ideal.
Both platforms score highly on ease of use, with Apaleo at 4.9/5 and Noovy at 4.84/5. Apaleo’s user interface is described as friendly, with a smooth, intuitive experience that supports rapid onboarding for staff, even those unfamiliar with PMS systems. Its open API and modular approach might require a learning curve but are praised for flexibility once mastered.
Noovy’s interface is equally praised for being simple, fast, and reliable, with many users describing it as highly intuitive, especially for independent hotel teams. The onboarding process is smooth, and staff adoption tends to be quick. Edge: Apaleo, due to its slightly higher usability rating and extensive support for complex operations.
Apaleo offers 37 shared features plus 2 unique functionalities, including SOC2 compliance and automated assignments—features that support security and operational automation. Noovy boasts 35 shared features, plus 13 unique features like a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, native email marketing, and kiosk check-in.
If advanced guest communication, revenue optimization, and self-check-in are priorities, Noovy’s rich feature set surpasses Apaleo’s. Conversely, Apaleo’s strength lies in its open API and integration capabilities, allowing hotels to tailor their tech stack precisely. Edge: Noovy, for its broader range of core operational features out of the box.
Both systems enjoy high support ratings, with Apaleo at 4.83/5 and Noovy at 4.89/5. Apaleo’s community and support are praised for responsiveness, but some users mention a desire for more comprehensive support options like phone support. Many reviews highlight Apaleo’s active community and regular updates, which foster trust and problem resolution.
Noovy’s support receives slightly higher praise, with reviews emphasizing friendly, fast, and reliable service that makes onboarding and troubleshooting seamless. Their 24/7 chat and phone support are a big plus for hotels needing quick assistance. Edge: Noovy, for their consistently higher customer support ratings and positive user feedback.
Apaleo leads with 120 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Revinate, and IDeaS, along with exclusive integrations such as Right Revenue and Hotelkit. Noovy offers 40 verified integrations, including prominent partners like OTELITY, Lightspeed, and Hoteliers.com, but lacks some of the extensive third-party ecosystem that Apaleo provides.
For hotels requiring large-scale integrations or bespoke system setups, Apaleo’s broad partner network is essential. If your operation mainly needs core functionalities with a few direct integrations, Noovy’s more limited but sufficient set may suffice. Edge: Apaleo, due to its significantly larger and more diverse integration network.
Despite Apaleo’s high review scores for support and onboarding, its actual review count (29) and recent reviews (1 in the last 6 months) are lower. Noovy, with only 19 reviews but all rated 5/5, has a higher overall rating and more recent feedback, indicating strong current user satisfaction, especially among independent hotels.
For hoteliers who prioritize peer validation and recent experiences, Noovy’s perfect scores and recent reviews make it the more trusted choice. Apaleo’s higher overall score is hampered by limited recent feedback; thus, Noovy edges out here.
Apaleo’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no mention of a free tier or trial, positioning it as a premium solution. Noovy charges €£$5 per room per month, offering an affordable all-in-one system without a setup fee or hidden costs.
If budget is a concern and your hotel is smaller or independent, Noovy’s lower price point provides excellent value. Larger hotels or groups needing extensive customization might find Apaleo’s higher cost justified for its flexibility.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prefers a plug-and-play system with minimal setup. Also, not recommended if your team wants a budget-friendly, straightforward solution without extensive integrations.
Not ideal if you require highly customizable workflows, extensive third-party integrations, or advanced revenue management tools. Larger hotel chains with complex needs might find Noovy’s features limiting.
Apaleo stands out for its open API, extensive integrations, and scalability, making it well-suited for larger or growing hotel groups. Its customization capabilities and community support are major advantages, but it comes with a higher price tag and a steeper learning curve.
Noovy offers a straightforward, cost-effective, all-in-one solution that is ideal for independent hotels or small chains. Its strong support and ease of use make it attractive for hotels prioritizing speed, simplicity, and reliable customer service.
If your hotel needs flexible, scalable tech and extensive integrations, Apaleo is the clear choice. For hotels that prioritize ease, affordability, and quick setup, Noovy delivers the most value.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Apaleo Open PMS and Noovy PMS share 35 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"One of the biggest impacts for us has been the vast array of implementation options available on Apaleo. We’re now able to think outside the box and customise solutions in ways we..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing impro... The platform's commitment to regular updates and community engagement is well-received, with users valuing the attention to feedback and ongoing improvements. The active community provides a support network that enhances the user experience.
Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems t... Users highlight Apaleo's strength in customization, allowing tailored workflows and process automation. This flexibility helps hotels create systems that align perfectly with their operational needs, enhancing efficiency and improving guest services.
Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and... Apaleo's open API is uniquely praised for enabling custom tech stacks and seamless integration with various systems, greatly enhancing efficiency and flexibility in operations. Reviewers appreciate the ability to create their own applications and tech ecosystems, significantly setting Apaleo apart from its competitors.
Where hoteliers push back
While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current o... While users value the basic reporting functionalities, there is a noticeable demand for advanced reporting features within Apaleo. Many find current options limited, leading to reliance on additional tools for deeper analytics.
Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehe... Apaleo's group management features receive praise for user-friendliness, but some reviews note areas for improvement, particularly concerning comprehensive functionality and intuitiveness.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many reviews praise the system's ease of use, noting its user-friendly design and intuitive interface which makes training new staff quick and reduces... Many reviews praise the system's ease of use, noting its user-friendly design and intuitive interface which makes training new staff quick and reduces operational errors.
Excellent customer service is frequently mentioned, with users appreciating quick responses and effective resolutions, contributing to overall satisfa... Excellent customer service is frequently mentioned, with users appreciating quick responses and effective resolutions, contributing to overall satisfaction with the product.
The system facilitates automatic payment requests and processing, drastically simplifying billing and reducing error rates. This feature is also appre... The system facilitates automatic payment requests and processing, drastically simplifying billing and reducing error rates. This feature is also appreciated for its efficiency in handling non-refundable bookings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the software's functionality but note that the design is slightly outdated, though a redesign is anticipated to address this issue.
The software offers robust reporting tools that provide insights into various aspects of hotel operations, aiding in better management decisions.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Apaleo Open PMS and Noovy PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Apaleo Open PMS offers 120 verified integration partners, while Noovy PMS offers 40. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Apaleo Open PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Apaleo Open PMS: No. Noovy PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. apaleo GmbH has an HT Score of 78 and Noovy has 71. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor