The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 131 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ASA Hotelsoftware shines , with exclusive features like Payment processing and On premise.
CiHMS shines when it comes to operational efficiency — especially for Resorts properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Channel Manager and Integrated CRS.
Side-by-side ratings based on 131 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 11 | 120 |
After analyzing 131 verified reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware users most value its , while CiHMS users highlight operational efficiency, advanced reporting, task and resource management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Task and Resource Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud-Based Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
User Training and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #49 4 reviews | #45 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #43 6 reviews | #20 31 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 43 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #4 31 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #61 1 reviews | #15 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #51 2 reviews | #10 83 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #59 1 reviews | #15 40 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #17 15 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #65 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #27 11 reviews | #58 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #6 117 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #24 1 reviews |
Choosing between ASA Hotelsoftware and CiHMS requires understanding how each platform addresses your hotel's specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, improve guest experiences, and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. ASA Hotelsoftware excels in usability, feature richness, and support, while CiHMS offers extensive automation, multi-channel management, and affordability. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize a highly-rated, user-friendly system or a more comprehensive, flexible platform.
Does your team need a proven, intuitive solution with a strong support network, or does your hotel benefit more from advanced automation and multi-channel capabilities? Let's compare these options to clarify which aligns best with your operational priorities.
ASA Hotelsoftware is a mature, highly-rated property management system with over 11 recent reviews, all of which praise its ease of use, versatile features, and excellent support. Its 5/5 overall rating and 100% likelihood to recommend reflect strong confidence from users in Europe, especially within resorts and inns.
Conversely, CiHMS has a broader global presence with 101 reviews, but a 0/5 rating indicates widespread dissatisfaction or inconsistent performance among users. Although it offers advanced functionalities like multi-channel reservations and automation, recent reviews reveal issues with system stability, slowdowns during peak times, and less user satisfaction.
Given the more recent reviews and higher overall ratings, ASA Hotelsoftware provides a more reliable and user-friendly experience today. Is your hotel looking for a trusted, highly-rated platform, or are you willing to accept potential instability for more features?
If your hotel needs an easy-to-use, versatile property management system with proven support, go with ASA Hotelsoftware. Its 5/5 rating and extensive positive feedback underscore its reliability and simplicity, especially suited for resorts, inns, and smaller properties seeking straightforward operations.
If you require advanced automation, multi-channel distribution, and revenue management features—particularly for large, complex properties—CiHMS might appeal. Its affordability and broad feature set support chains and hotels with multiple sales channels, but recent user dissatisfaction should be a caution.
For hoteliers prioritizing support, stability, and proven user satisfaction, ASA Hotelsoftware is the safer choice. If your hotel can tolerate some instability for access to extensive channel management and automation, CiHMS could be considered, but its reviews raise concerns.
ASA Hotelsoftware boasts a very high ease-of-use rating (4.73/5), complemented by onboarding scores of 4.6/5 and straightforward reviews emphasizing its logical interface. Users mention that staff find it accessible, even for those new to PMS systems, and frequent updates are well-managed with dedicated support.
CiHMS also scores impressively for ease of use (4.9/5), with reviews citing an intuitive, lean UI and support for multi-platform access. However, some users report initial onboarding complexity due to the system's breadth and the need for additional training resources.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, thanks to its slightly higher confidence in recent reviews and more consistent praise for usability.
ASA Hotelsoftware offers 17 features unique to it, including integrated payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, guest app, and shift planning—features that support day-to-day hotel operations comprehensively. Its total feature count of 46 surpasses CiHMS, which has only 4 features exclusive to it, such as a channel manager and booking engine.
CiHMS excels in multi-channel reservation management and automation but lacks many of the guest engagement features found in ASA Hotelsoftware. Its strengths lie in advanced rate plan configuration and integration with distribution channels, but it offers fewer overall features.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, with a broader suite of tools directly supporting hotel management and guest relations.
ASA Hotelsoftware's support scores (4.73/5) and recent reviews highlight responsive, helpful customer service. Users appreciate the dedicated contacts and quick resolution of issues, although some wish for faster updates on certain matters.
CiHMS slightly outperforms with a 4.92/5 rating, with reviewers praising its support team's professionalism and timely assistance. Given the recent review count and positive feedback, CiHMS's support appears marginally more reliable.
Edge: CiHMS, based on the slightly higher support ratings and recent positive comments.
ASA Hotelsoftware boasts 49 verified partners, including major hospitality integrations like Onity, Vingcard, and Vax. Its extensive partner ecosystem covers key areas like revenue management, marketing, and guest communication.
CiHMS has only 3 verified partners, with integrations mainly limited to Channel Manager, DerbySoft, and Easyway. While these support basic operations, they do not match ASA Hotelsoftware's breadth.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, for its larger partner network and more comprehensive integration options.
Recent reviews show ASA Hotelsoftware with a perfect 5/5 rating and a 100% likelihood to recommend, especially among resort hotels and inns. Hoteliers highlight its ease of use, flexibility, and excellent support.
CiHMS, despite a large review base, has a 0/5 overall rating, indicating widespread dissatisfaction. The recent reviews echo issues with system stability and limited satisfaction.
Edge: ASA Hotelsoftware, given its superior and more recent user ratings.
ASA Hotelsoftware costs $1,000 as a one-time base fee, with no specified subscription or implementation fees. Its pricing model is straightforward, but exact long-term costs may depend on additional modules or support.
CiHMS is priced at $900 upfront, with no mention of ongoing charges, but details on licensing or subscription are scarce. Both are similarly priced, making cost less of a differentiator.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
In summary, ASA Hotelsoftware excels in reliability, ease of use, and support, making it ideal for properties that want a straightforward, trusted management system. Its extensive feature set and strong user ratings position it as the top choice for hotels prioritizing stability and guest relations.
CiHMS offers advanced automation, multi-channel management, and affordability, suitable for larger chains or hotels with complex distribution needs. However, its recent reviews warn of stability issues and less user satisfaction, which could impact daily operations.
If your hotel needs a proven, user-friendly platform backed by consistent positive reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware is the recommended pick. Choose CiHMS only if your property can tolerate possible system instability and you require its automation and distribution capabilities, especially for larger, multi-channel operations.
This detailed comparison should help your team make an informed decision aligned with your operational needs and guest service priorities.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASA Hotel Software and CiHMS share 29 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| On premise | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 9 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines... The software is praised for its task assignment features, supporting independent management by staff like housekeeping. This functionality streamlines operations and enhances productivity across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, ma... Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting capabilities of CIHMS, which enable in-depth analysis of performance, revenue, and occupancy. However, many users seek further customization to tailor reports to specific needs.
While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive... While CIHMS is user-friendly, initial training and onboarding can be complex due to the system's breadth of features. Users suggest more comprehensive training resources and detailed guides.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASA Hotel Software and CiHMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASA Hotel Software offers 49 verified integration partners, while CiHMS offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. CiHMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASA Hotel Software: No. CiHMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ASA Hotelsoftware has an HT Score of 0 and CiHMS has 81. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor