The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 339 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ASA Hotelsoftware shines , with exclusive features like On premise and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Clock shines when it comes to feature richness — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 339 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 11 | 328 |
After analyzing 339 verified reviews, ASA Hotelsoftware users most value its , while Clock users highlight feature richness, operational efficiency, responsive support and regular updates. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feature Richness
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Responsive Support and Regular Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use for Training
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Error Messages
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Feature
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #49 4 reviews | #11 117 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #43 6 reviews | #7 157 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #11 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #61 1 reviews | #8 165 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #51 2 reviews | #11 80 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #59 1 reviews | #8 62 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #39 2 reviews | #9 27 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #17 30 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #27 11 reviews | #3 228 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #17 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical to streamlining your hotel’s operations, enhancing the guest experience, and increasing revenue. Both ASA Hotelsoftware and Clock PMS aim to solve these core problems, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and international presence. ASA Hotelsoftware, with only 11 reviews, offers a solid, well-regarded solution primarily in Europe, while Clock PMS, with over 250 reviews and a broad global footprint, has a more extensive feature set and higher overall confidence. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both ASA and Clock PMS are designed to optimize hotel operations, but their approaches differ. ASA Hotelsoftware presents a traditional, comprehensive system favored by resorts and boutique hotels in Europe, emphasizing modules like spa and guest communication. Clock PMS, by contrast, offers an all-in-one cloud solution with a focus on automation, integrations, and a broad international reach, trusted by a diverse array of hotel types worldwide, including large resorts, city hotels, and hostels.
ASA Hotelsoftware provides a streamlined, module-based platform trusted mainly in Europe, with a reputation for ease of use and versatile room management. Clock PMS, with significantly more recent reviews and a higher rating, emphasizes automation, guest engagement, and operational efficiency across multiple regions. Are you seeking a localized, European-centric system, or a more global, feature-rich platform?
If your hotel operates primarily in Europe and needs a straightforward, reliable property management system with modules like spa and guest messaging, ASA Hotelsoftware offers a proven solution. It’s best suited for resorts, inns, and boutique hotels prioritizing ease of use and staff satisfaction, with a focus on core hotel management functions.
On the other hand, if you require a highly customizable, scalable platform capable of integrating multiple systems, managing complex booking channels, and supporting international operations, Clock PMS is the better choice. It’s ideal for hotels seeking automation, extensive integrations like booking engines and channel managers, and a system that adapts to evolving market demands.
In summary, go with ASA if your hotel values simplicity, European stability, and module-specific solutions. Choose Clock if your property demands a versatile, cloud-based system with a broader feature set and global presence.
Both platforms score impressively on usability, with ASA at 4.73/5 and Clock at 4.78/5. Reviews highlight ASA’s intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding, praised for staff adoption and logical workflows—"finding solutions is easy just by typing a word," says one user. Clock’s UI is similarly user-friendly, with comments emphasizing its ease for new staff and quick training, such as "no loss of time" during onboarding.
However, while ASA is praised for its logical design, Clock’s comprehensive features might initially seem overwhelming but are appreciated for their consistency and automation. Overall, both systems are easy to adopt, but Clock’s slightly higher rating and recent reviews suggest a marginal edge here.
Edge: Clock PMS.
ASA Hotelsoftware offers four features unique to its platform: a Spa & Wellness Module, guest communication via SMS, on-premise deployment, and voice-to-text notes. Its total feature count is four, primarily focused on traditional hotel management functions.
Clock PMS boasts 16 features exclusive to its system, including a booking engine, channel management, integrated CRS, guest profiles, multi-currency and multilingual support, online checkout, kiosk check-in, and automated reminders. Its total features number 42, covering extensive automation, guest engagement, and management tools that ASA lacks.
Given the broader, more diverse feature set, Clock PMS clearly has the advantage for hotels looking to integrate advanced automation and guest-facing features.
Edge: Clock PMS.
Both products enjoy high support ratings—ASA at 4.73/5 and Clock at 4.75/5—indicating strong customer service. ASA’s reviews mention "very few problems" and a dedicated contact for questions, though some wish for faster resolution times. Clock’s support is described as "responsive" and "proactive," with recent user quotes emphasizing quick assistance and continuous system improvements.
While support quality appears comparable, Clock’s slightly higher recent review count and more recent positive feedback point to a marginally better customer support experience overall.
Edge: Clock PMS.
ASA Hotelsoftware integrates with 49 verified partners, including well-known names like Fairmas and Booking Expert. Clock PMS offers 111 verified integrations, including shared partners like RateBoard and SuitePad, as well as unique connections such as Curacity, Profitroom, and RevControl.
Clock’s broader integration ecosystem allows for more tailored, extensive connectivity across booking channels, revenue management, and guest engagement tools. For hotels seeking flexibility and more third-party compatibility, Clock’s higher partner count is advantageous.
Edge: Clock PMS.
ASA Hotelsoftware has only 11 reviews, all rating it a perfect 5/5, but the limited data restricts broader insights. Its recent reviews are scarce, with only one in the last six months, so confidence in current performance is limited.
Clock PMS, with over 250 reviews and an average rating of 4.8/5, receives high marks from a diverse range of hotel types. Recent reviews praise its operational efficiency, ease of onboarding, and continuous updates, making it the more trustworthy choice based on recent, extensive feedback.
Given the volume and recency, Clock PMS’s ratings reflect a stronger, more confident endorsement.
Edge: Clock PMS.
ASA Hotelsoftware’s pricing starts at a base of $1,000 with no freemium model or monthly fees outlined. Clock PMS offers a lower entry point at $600, also without ongoing fees or freemium options.
While both are upfront, ASA’s higher base price may reflect its more extensive modules, but Clock’s competitive pricing makes it attractive for smaller or budget-conscious hotels seeking extensive features without a hefty initial investment.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive automation, global integrations, or plans for rapid scaling.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, prefers a simple, localized system, or has minimal digital engagement needs.
ASA Hotelsoftware is a traditional, stable solution primarily suited for resorts and boutique hotels in Europe. Its focus on core management modules and ease of use makes it ideal for hotels that want a straightforward system with familiar functionality.
Clock PMS stands out as a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with more features, integrations, and a global footprint. Its automation and guest engagement tools make it suitable for hotels aiming to scale, innovate, and operate efficiently across regions.
If you need a trusted, straightforward system with proven stability, ASA is the choice. But if your hotel seeks extensive automation, flexible integrations, and a system that adapts to growth, Clock PMS is the clear winner.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASA Hotel Software and Clock PMS share 42 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 6 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Clock is best all-in-one platform for managing hotel and event operations in one connected environment. It makes it easy to track bookings, organize group reservations, and handle..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Elegancia selected Clock for its flexibility, strong integration capabilities, and robust multi-property management—an essential requirement for a growing hotel group. The ability..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Quicker service, reduced request errors, and more consistent operations, resulting in higher guest satisfaction"
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of feat... Clock PMS+ offers a wide array of features that are beneficial for managing hotel operations and events. However, some users find the plethora of features overwhelming and suggest improved organization.
The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contribut... The software significantly enhances operational efficiency by saving time and streamlining communication and coordination among departments, contributing to a smoother experience for both staff and guests.
Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliabilit... Users appreciate the responsive support service and the regular updates that introduce new features and improvements, ensuring the system's reliability and relevance to user needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the erro... Users occasionally encounter error messages that are displayed in code, making it difficult to resolve issues quickly. Direct navigation from the error message to the problem would improve user experience.
While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful... While comprehensive, the reporting feature can be slow, which limits its current effectiveness. Users suggest optimization could unlock more powerful capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. ASA Hotel Software and Clock PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASA Hotel Software offers 49 verified integration partners, while Clock PMS offers 111. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Clock PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASA Hotel Software: No. Clock PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ASA Hotelsoftware has an HT Score of 0 and Clock has 84. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor