The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 111 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Asana shines .
Flexkeeping shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest requests and Mobile Request Dispatching.
Side-by-side ratings based on 111 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 109 |
After analyzing 111 verified reviews, Asana users most value its , while Flexkeeping users highlight task management, staff communication, room and task assignments. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Task Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Staff Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Room and Task Assignments
▾
|
|
|
+
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with Other Systems
▾
|
|
|
−
Language Options
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Staff Collaboration Tools vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #14 1 reviews | #6 12 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 1 reviews | #7 53 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 25 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 18 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 43 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #26 1 reviews | #5 43 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #26 1 reviews | #7 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 15 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #32 1 reviews | #12 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #23 1 reviews | #2 88 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #10 1 reviews |
As a hotelier evaluating staff collaboration tools, your primary goal is to find a platform that enhances operational efficiency, staff coordination, and guest satisfaction. Both Asana and Flexkeeping aim to simplify team workflows, but they approach this challenge differently. Asana is a general project management tool with a broad user base, while Flexkeeping is specialized for hotel operations. Your decision hinges on your hotel's specific needs—are you seeking a versatile task management platform or a tailored hotel operations suite?
If your team needs a flexible, widely-used collaboration platform with a proven track record across industries, Asana might seem attractive. However, if your hotel demands a purpose-built solution that integrates tightly with property management systems and offers advanced operational features, Flexkeeping holds a compelling edge. Which of these aligns better with your operational priorities?
Both platforms aim to streamline team communication and task management, but their core strengths differ. Asana offers a straightforward interface with 4 out of 5 stars based on 2 reviews, making it easy to adopt but limited in hotel-specific functionalities. Flexkeeping, on the other hand, scores over 92 out of 100 with 98 recent reviews, reflecting its extensive feature set and strong hotel industry reputation.
While Asana is praised for its simplicity—some reviewers say it can "completely change the way a company communicates"—its lack of hotel-specific features means your team might need to adapt workflows manually. Flexkeeping’s suite of 38 features, including automated room assignments and real-time task tracking, directly addresses hotel operations, making it more suitable for complex workflows. Do you prefer a general project management tool or a tailored hotel operations suite?
If your hotel needs a dedicated operations platform that integrates with PMS, automates housekeeping tasks, and provides analytics, Flexkeeping is the clear choice. Its users report a 285% ROI and a 91% boost in productivity, highlighting its effectiveness for medium and large hotels aiming to modernize workflows.
If your team prioritizes broad collaboration, flexible task management, and minimal setup, Asana can serve as an effective, easy-to-learn tool—especially if your staff already use it elsewhere. However, its lack of hotel-specific modules means you'll likely need to customize workflows and accept some gaps in automation. For hotels seeking operational automation and real-time task management, Flexkeeping is the better fit.
Asana maintains a user rating of 4 out of 5, with some reviews highlighting its simplicity for teams unfamiliar with project management software. However, its onboarding score of 3 out of 5 suggests some users find initial setup challenging, especially without hotel-specific guidance.
Flexkeeping, by contrast, boasts a 4.94 out of 5 ease of use rating and an onboarding score of 4.88, indicating a smoother experience. Multiple recent reviews praise its intuitive mobile app and quick deployment, with users noting a "fully cloud-based, no investment needed" approach that simplifies staff adoption.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Asana offers a core set of project management features, including task assignment, deadlines, and progress tracking—totaling just 4-5 functionalities. Flexkeeping, with 38 features, provides specialized modules like automated room assignments, guest requests, real-time task tracking, deep cleaning scheduling, and analytics dashboards, directly tailored for hotel needs.
Flexkeeping’s unique features, such as virtual logbooks and performance analytics, address operational gaps that Asana cannot cover without extensive customization. For hotel teams seeking advanced automation and operational oversight, Flexkeeping's feature richness offers a decisive advantage.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Asana’s customer support ratings are modest at 2.5 out of 5, with reviews mentioning that support can be inconsistent and reporting and analysis are weak. Some users note that, "support is not very responsive" and onboarding can be challenging without dedicated assistance.
Flexkeeping’s stellar rating of 4.91 out of 5 reflects consistent, timely support, with many reviews praising their "excellent technical support" and ongoing development. Users say they feel supported during onboarding and after, which is critical for operational tools integrated into daily hotel workflows.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Asana has no verified integrations in the hotel industry, limiting its ability to connect with PMS, point-of-sale, or revenue management systems. Flexkeeping, with 24 verified partners like RoomRaccoon, Guesty, Mews, and Oracle Hospitality, offers seamless integrations crucial for hotel operations.
This extensive integration network enables your team to synchronize tasks, maintenance, and guest data across systems, reducing manual work and errors. Flexkeeping’s ability to connect with industry-standard software makes it far more suitable for hotels seeking a unified operational platform.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
With only 2 reviews in total, Asana’s hotel ratings are minimal, and none are recent or detailed enough to draw conclusions. Flexkeeping, on the other hand, boasts 98 reviews with a 4.97/5 average rating, primarily from hotel and resort users.
Recent reviews highlight its ability to "improve daily operations" and "significantly increase staff productivity," especially in large resorts and boutique hotels. With a 99% likelihood to recommend, Flexkeeping is clearly the preferred choice among hotel operators, particularly for those focused on operational automation.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Asana does not publicly list prices, but its free tier supports up to 15 users and unlimited projects, making it suitable for small teams. Additional costs are typically subscription-based, with enterprise plans requiring custom quotes, which might be expensive for hotel-specific needs.
Flexkeeping’s flat rate of $300 monthly covers its extensive suite of features, with no mention of additional hidden costs or setup fees. Given its tailored hotel modules, Flexkeeping offers predictable pricing aligned with operational needs, making it a more transparent investment for hotels.
Flexkeeping and Asana serve different needs. Asana excels as a general team collaboration tool, suitable for hotels with minimal operational automation needs and staff familiar with project management software. It’s best for small properties or administrative teams that require simple task tracking without hotel-specific modules.
Flexkeeping, however, is designed specifically for hotel workflows, offering automation, integrations, and detailed operational features. Its recent reviews and higher scores demonstrate its reliability and suitability for larger properties or those committed to digitalizing their operations.
If your hotel needs a dedicated operations platform that connects seamlessly with PMS and drives efficiency, Flexkeeping is the clear choice. For general collaboration among non-operational teams, Asana can work, but it falls short in hotel-specific functionality.
In conclusion, if your focus is streamlining complex hotel operations and enhancing guest satisfaction, Flexkeeping should be your choice.
Staff Collaboration Tools pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Asana and Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Room Assignments | ||
| Guest requests | ||
| Lost & found | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Mobile Request Dispatching | ||
| Progress Tracking Dashboard |
Showing top differences. 26 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Flexkeeping completely transformed our workflow which led to an 80% reduction in the workload, simplifying processes and massively lowering our stress levels!"
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Every comment a guest makes gets immediately communicated throughout the whole hotel. Since it’s such a transparent platform, staff can react instantly, and management can stay inf..."
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Users frequently highlight Flexkeeping’s robust task management features, including efficient assignment, tracking, and management of tasks which stre... Users frequently highlight Flexkeeping’s robust task management features, including efficient assignment, tracking, and management of tasks which streamline operations and save time. Enhanced organization has significantly improved team collaboration, creating a more stress-free workflow.
The platform is commended for enhancing interdepartmental communication, connecting housekeeping, reception, and technical services instantly without... The platform is commended for enhancing interdepartmental communication, connecting housekeeping, reception, and technical services instantly without delays. This seamless connection results in improved team efficiency and reduced communication errors.
Flexkeeping excels in room and task assignments, allowing hotels to allocate rooms to cleaning staff effectively. This feature is noted to have expedi... Flexkeeping excels in room and task assignments, allowing hotels to allocate rooms to cleaning staff effectively. This feature is noted to have expedited room assignment and daily task creation, contributing to smooth operations.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally satisfied, some users express a desire for more customization options to better tailor the tool to specific team or property needs and... While generally satisfied, some users express a desire for more customization options to better tailor the tool to specific team or property needs and improve user experience.
Flexkeeping’s integration capabilities with systems like PMS are essential for holistic management, though some users experienced minor downtime issue... Flexkeeping’s integration capabilities with systems like PMS are essential for holistic management, though some users experienced minor downtime issues recently, which are expected to improve with ongoing system updates.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Asana and Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite share many core Staff Collaboration Tools features, but each has unique capabilities. Asana offers 0 verified integration partners, while Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite offers 24. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Asana: No. Flexkeeping - Collaborations Suite: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Staff Collaboration Tools vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Asana has an HT Score of 0 and Flexkeeping has 92. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor