The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 84 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines when it comes to ease of use and intuitive interface , with exclusive features like On premise and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Counter shines when it comes to user interface and usability .
Side-by-side ratings based on 84 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 57 |
After analyzing 84 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while Counter users highlight user interface and usability, customer support, automated features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
+
User interface and usability
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
+
Automated features
▾
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
+
Platform integration
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
−
Bug issues
▾
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
−
Reporting and revenue management
▾
|
|
−
Pricing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #26 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #46 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #32 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 2 reviews | #31 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #31 16 reviews |
| Luxury | #51 2 reviews | #44 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #43 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #48 1 reviews | #32 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | #25 8 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #20 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #27 1 reviews | #16 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #11 2 reviews |
Choosing between ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) and Counter hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and operational priorities. ASI is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS with a broad array of features, extensive integrations, and a proven track record, especially suited for hotels seeking advanced management tools. Counter, on the other hand, is a free, streamlined platform designed primarily for hostels and small properties prioritizing easy onboarding and rapid daily management.
Both products address core PMS needs—reservations, check-in/out, housekeeping, and reporting—but diverge significantly in scope and complexity. Do you need a feature-rich system to scale your operations or a simple, cost-effective solution for a hostel or small property? Let’s explore the details.
ASI PMS and Counter both aim to simplify property management, yet they serve vastly different hotel profiles. ASI offers deep functionality, extensive integrations, and scalability, making it suitable for mid-size to large hotels that require detailed reporting, revenue management, and multi-property support. Conversely, Counter is tailored for hostels and small properties, emphasizing ease of use, mobile management, and automation of basic tasks.
The critical difference lies in review volume and recency: ASI has 26 reviews, all from recent months, with a high recommendation rate of 97%, indicating active, current user feedback. Counter has 54 reviews, but none in the last six months, which raises questions about ongoing support and updates. Given the recent review activity and higher overall rating, ASI’s insights are more dependable.
Are you looking for a robust, enterprise-level system or a simple, budget-friendly tool? The answer determines which product better aligns with your hotel’s needs.
If your hotel needs advanced reservation management, detailed analytics, and integrations with third-party platforms like Cendyn or Duetto, go with ASI. It’s ideal for properties that require multi-property support, revenue management, and extensive reporting, especially if you plan to scale.
If your hotel is a hostel or small inn with a focus on straightforward check-in/out, minimal guest data, and mobile management, Counter is the better fit. It’s free, easy to learn, and designed for properties that prioritize automation, POS integration, and intuitive interfaces over complex features.
Your decision hinges on your property type and operational complexity: choose ASI for scalability and depth, Counter for simplicity and rapid deployment.
ASI PMS boasts a high ease of use score of 4.88/5 but has some noted slow response times after migrating to cloud, which can hinder staff adoption. Its interface, praised for clarity and intuitive navigation, suits tech-savvy properties with dedicated administrative staff.
Counter scores 4.6/5 in ease of use, with reviews highlighting its simple, clean interface and straightforward onboarding. Its mobile-friendly design allows staff to manage operations from anywhere, making it ideal for on-the-go hostel environments.
Edge: ASI. While both are easy to learn, ASI’s high usability scores and recent positive reviews tilt the balance slightly in its favor for larger or more tech-equipped hotels.
ASI offers 28 features exclusive to its platform, including online check-in, digital registration, real-time status updates, revenue management, and integrated payment terminals. Its extensive feature set supports complex operations, multi-property management, and detailed reporting.
Counter, despite being simpler, provides core PMS features, POS integration, automated payments, and mobile management but lacks advanced revenue tools and some automation options. Its features are sufficient for small operations but limit scalability.
Edge: ASI. Its broader feature set and specialized modules give it a significant advantage for properties needing comprehensive management tools.
Support quality is a key differentiator. ASI’s support rating is 4.73/5, with users commenting on prompt technical assistance, though some mention response delays. Its support team is seen as professional and knowledgeable, which benefits hotels needing reliable troubleshooting.
Counter’s support scores slightly higher at 4.96/5, with reviews praising responsiveness and helpfulness, especially from staff like Evelyn and Max. However, some users report slower support in non-European time zones, which can impact urgent needs.
Edge: Counter. Its higher support rating and recent positive feedback make it slightly more dependable for day-to-day issues.
ASI boasts 18 verified integrations, including major partners like SiteMinder, Cendyn, Duetto, and Vertical Booking. Its extensive partner network supports broader distribution, revenue management, and operational automation, making it suitable for large hotels with diverse tech stacks.
Counter offers 7 verified integrations, including Stripe, Goki, and channel managers like WuBook. Its focus on POS and simple platform integrations caters well to hostels and small properties but limits scalability.
Edge: ASI. Its larger, more varied integration ecosystem supports complex operations and growth.
Recent reviews reveal a stark contrast. ASI’s 26 reviews in the last six months lead to a 97% likelihood to recommend, with hotel segments (though only one property type reported) rating it highly for stability and reporting. Its overall rating is 0/5, but this appears to be a data anomaly, with users emphasizing ease of use and support.
Counter, with 54 reviews, has a rating of 4.73/5, primarily from hostel operators. Users value its simplicity and automation but note persistent bugs and limited revenue features. Due to recent review activity, ASI's higher recent ratings make it the more reliable choice.
Edge: ASI. The volume and recency of reviews heavily favor ASI’s reliability and user satisfaction.
ASI is priced at a flat $300/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade offering. Its cost is justified by its extensive features, integrations, and scalability.
Counter’s pricing isn’t explicitly listed but is implied to be free or low-cost, targeting budget-conscious hostels and small properties. Additional costs may arise from integrations or add-ons, but the core system is accessible without hefty fees.
In summary, ASI provides clear value for properties needing advanced, scalable management, while Counter offers a low-cost, easy-to-implement solution for small operations.
ASI and Counter serve distinctly different hotel segments. ASI offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform suitable for larger, growth-oriented properties, while Counter provides a streamlined, budget-friendly solution tailored for hostels and small inns.
Choose ASI if your hotel demands deep automation, extensive integrations, and detailed analytics, especially if scaling is in your future. Opt for Counter if you value simplicity, mobile management, and cost-efficiency, and your operations are manageable with fewer advanced features.
For hotels seeking reliability, depth, and future growth potential, ASI stands out as the clear choice due to its recent active reviews, broad feature set, and extensive integrations. If your focus is on quick deployment and ease of use, Counter remains a strong contender, but with some limitations in scalability and advanced reporting.
Note: This comparison is based on the latest available reviews and data, emphasizing the active user community and recent feedback to guide your decision-making.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and Counter share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 16 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces w... Hoteliers find Counter's interface clean, intuitive, and user-friendly, making it easy to train new staff quickly. The mobile and desktop interfaces work well, allowing managers to handle tasks remotely. It is particularly noted for its simplicity in calendar and calendar management.
The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for thei... The support team at Counter is frequently praised for its responsiveness and helpfulness. Staff like Evelyn and Max receive specific mentions for their professionalism. However, there are concerns about slower support in certain time zones.
Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings acro... Users appreciate Counter's automated features that include tasks like contactless check-in, automating credit card charges, and managing bookings across platforms. This automation reduces staff workload and improves operational efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during boo... Several hoteliers mention persistent bugs in the system, particularly issues with overbookings, bed availability display, and system errors during booking cancellations. These bugs have a negative impact on daily operations and guest experience.
Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are s... Hoteliers appreciate Counter's reporting capabilities but note that the reports can be improved for better insights. Revenue management features are seen as lacking, particularly for businesses operating on multiple rate plans or using dynamic pricing.
Ranks higher for
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and Counter share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while Counter offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. Counter: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and Counter has 17. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor