The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 61 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in onboarding , with exclusive features like On premise and Guest CRM.
Shiji Group shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 61 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 34 |
After analyzing 61 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 2 reviews | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #51 2 reviews | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #48 1 reviews | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #27 1 reviews | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Both ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to simplify hotel management but diverge in their core strengths. ASI is known for its straightforward, user-friendly interface and deep reporting, while Shiji offers a broader feature set with more integrations and global reach. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both ASI PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS serve as comprehensive solutions for hotel management, but they address different hotel needs. ASI excels in ease of use, stability, and detailed reporting, making it a solid choice for hotels that prioritize operational simplicity and insightful analytics. Shiji, on the other hand, offers a vast array of features and integrations tailored for hotel groups seeking scalability and multi-property management. Do you need a system that’s easy to learn or one packed with advanced features?
ASI has a higher recent review count (26 reviews in the last 6 months) compared to Shiji’s zero recent reviews, indicating more current user feedback and confidence. While Shiji boasts a broader feature set (57 unique features versus ASI’s 6), its complexity may be overwhelming for smaller hotels or those seeking a straightforward platform. Are your team’s priorities more aligned with user-friendliness or feature breadth?
If your hotel needs a robust, easy-to-use PMS with reliable performance and straightforward reporting, go with ASI. It’s particularly suitable for hotels that value operational clarity, detailed analytics, and responsive support, especially in North America and smaller markets. Conversely, if your hotel is part of a larger chain or aims for extensive automation, multi-property management, and global integrations, Shiji is the better fit, especially for properties in Europe, Asia, or Africa.
For smaller hotels or those new to PMS technology, ASI’s simplicity and consistent recent reviews make it the safer choice. Larger hotel groups seeking extensive feature options and integrations should lean toward Shiji’s comprehensive ecosystem.
ASI PMS scores 4.88/5 for ease of use, with reviewers citing its user-friendly, intuitive interface that simplifies daily tasks like check-in, check-out, and reporting. Implementation is rated at 4.69/5, reflecting smooth onboarding and staff adoption, even for those unfamiliar with hotel tech. Users consistently describe ASI as straightforward and easy to teach to new staff.
Shiji PMS scores 4.63/5 in ease of use, with reviews praising its accessible training materials and logical design. However, some users report slower response times, especially during peak periods, which can impact daily operations. While both systems are user-friendly, the clear edge goes to ASI for its more recent, higher-rated ease of use.
Edge: ASI PMS.
Shiji PMS offers 57 unique features, far exceeding ASI’s 6, including multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, and a host of automation tools. It also supports advanced modules like housekeeping, rate management, and transaction emails, making it suitable for hotels that want extensive operational control and guest engagement.
ASI’s features are more focused: it offers 6 exclusive tools, including a built-in Booking Engine, Guest CRM, Mobile App, Revenue Management, Channel Manager, and On-premise deployment. These are valuable but less extensive compared to Shiji’s, which has 41 shared features plus its unique modules. Overall, Shiji’s feature count and variety give it a distinct edge for hotels seeking a full-suite platform.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
ASI’s support is rated 4.73/5 with users commending its responsiveness and professionalism. Reviews mention prompt resolution of issues, helpful onboarding, and knowledgeable staff, contributing to smoother transitions and ongoing use.
Shiji’s support scores slightly lower at 4.53/5, with positive comments on the support team's professionalism but some users citing slower response times during peak periods. Given the recent review activity, ASI’s support appears more current and consistent, providing a slight edge.
Edge: ASI PMS.
Shiji has 64 verified integrations, including major partners like Amadeus, Revinate, and Oaky, along with a broad array of hotel-specific modules such as POS and EPoS. Its API-everything approach enables extensive customization and automation for large hotel groups or chains.
ASI offers 18 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Duetto. While these are significant, the narrower selection means less flexibility for hotels needing complex or diverse integrations.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Recent reviews favor ASI, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and higher ratings across categories, especially in ease of use and support. ASI’s 26 recent reviews reflect ongoing satisfaction among hotels in North America and smaller markets.
Shiji’s reviews, though positive, are fewer and less recent, with a 90% likelihood to recommend. Hotels in Europe and Asia particularly appreciate its features, but the overall recent sentiment favors ASI’s more consistent user ratings.
Edge: ASI PMS.
ASI’s pricing is notably lower at a flat $300, with no implementation or monthly fees, making it attractive for budget-conscious hotels or those seeking straightforward costs. Shiji’s base price is $1,200, with additional costs likely for integrations and modules, reflecting its broader feature set.
Exact ongoing costs for Shiji depend on negotiated contracts, but its higher base fee makes ASI the more accessible choice for smaller or mid-sized hotels.
Not ideal if your hotel needs multi-property management or advanced automation features.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, easy-to-learn system without many integrations.
ASI PMS is a straightforward, reliable platform ideal for smaller hotels and properties that value ease of use and detailed reporting. Its recent reviews reflect high satisfaction, especially in North America, with a significant focus on stability and support.
Shiji Daylight PMS provides a broader feature set, supporting larger hotel groups with extensive automation, integrations, and global capabilities. While it offers more advanced modules and customization, its user experience can be hampered by slower performance and more complex setup.
If your hotel values simplicity, quick deployment, and current positive feedback, choose ASI PMS. If your operation demands a feature-rich, scalable solution with deep integrations and international support, Shiji Daylight PMS is the better option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share 41 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 51 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor