The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 212 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AutoClerk, Inc. shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and ROI — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 212 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 209 |
After analyzing 212 verified reviews, AutoClerk, Inc. users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #54 0 reviews | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #64 0 reviews | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #57 1 reviews | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operational efficiency and revenue. You’re evaluating AutoClerk, Inc. and RoomRaccoon, both promising solutions but with notable differences in features, support, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on which system aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth goals. Do you prioritize recent reviews and broader functionality, or are you more focused on straightforward usability and cost?
Both products aim to streamline your daily tasks—from reservations to guest management—yet they approach these needs differently. AutoClerk caters to larger, independent properties and chains with its extensive integrations and revenue tools, while RoomRaccoon offers an all-in-one platform designed for small to medium-sized hotels seeking simplicity. So, which will serve your hotel best?
AutoClerk has been a longstanding player in hospitality tech, focusing on providing a comprehensive infrastructure for independent hotels and chains alike. It offers both web-based and Windows-based systems, with a suite of integrations and an emphasis on revenue management, guest profiles, and detailed reporting.
In contrast, RoomRaccoon, founded in 2017, is built for smaller hotels, boutique properties, and independents seeking an integrated, user-friendly solution. It combines PMS, channel management, booking engine, and more in a cloud-based platform designed to minimize operational complexity.
The core difference is in approach: AutoClerk aims to serve hotels with complex needs and larger portfolios, while RoomRaccoon focuses on delivering an easy-to-use, all-in-one platform for smaller operations. Do you need advanced features and scalability or quick, straightforward management?
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable PMS with extensive third-party integrations, AutoClerk is the better fit. Its robust revenue management, detailed reporting, and support for chains make it ideal for properties aiming to grow and diversify their tech ecosystem.
However, if your hotel is a boutique or independent property looking for an intuitive system that consolidates booking, channel management, and guest communications, RoomRaccoon offers a compelling package. Its user-friendly interface and all-in-one design are perfect for hotels prioritizing ease of use and automation without the complexity of larger systems.
For properties with a focus on automation, guest experience, and rapid onboarding, RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews—169 compared to AutoClerk’s 3—give it a clear advantage.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
AutoClerk scores a 4.33/5 for ease of use, with users describing its interface as simple but acknowledging that it could benefit from a modern design. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.33/5, and support is praised for quick resolutions, particularly support availability 24/7. However, some users find its interface less intuitive and more geared toward experienced staff.
RoomRaccoon excels with a 4.74/5 rating, praised for its user-friendly, intuitive interface, and straightforward onboarding process that minimizes staff training time. Customers highlight how quickly new users adapt and how the system simplifies daily operations, especially for small teams.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
AutoClerk offers core functionalities like guest profiles, loyalty programs, and revenue forecasting, but it lacks the extensive feature set seen in RoomRaccoon. RoomRaccoon boasts 51 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, payment processing, automated night audits, CRM, guest profiles, ancillary revenue tools, and a mobile app.
These features allow for a more integrated and automated workflow, especially beneficial for small hotels seeking to automate repetitive tasks and improve guest management. AutoClerk is more limited in features—lacking an integrated channel manager, booking engine, or automation tools.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
AutoClerk’s support team earns a 4.33/5 rating, with reviews praising their 24/7 availability and quick issue resolution—"support is extremely good at returning calls and resolving issues." However, with only 3 reviews in total, feedback is limited, and some users note the interface could be more intuitive.
RoomRaccoon’s support scores slightly higher at 4.53/5, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness and helpfulness—“the team is eager to assist and takes feedback seriously.” Given its larger user base (169 reviews), the consensus is that support is reliable and proactive.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including notable names like SiteMinder and Cendyn, which is suitable for properties needing specific third-party tools. Its integrations are primarily focused on revenue management and payment solutions.
RoomRaccoon’s ecosystem is more extensive with 88 verified partners, including shared partners like SiteMinder, but also many specialized integrations like Sage, Paxxio, and RevControl. Its open API and broad partner list enable more flexibility for properties that rely on multiple tools.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon has a significantly higher overall rating of 4.88/5 based on 169 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, automation, and revenue growth. Hotels in the independent, boutique, and small hotel segments consistently praise its simplicity and functionality.
AutoClerk’s rating is 3.5/5 based on just three reviews, with limited recent feedback. Some users appreciate its support but find the interface less modern and less tailored to small hotels.
For current user sentiment, RoomRaccoon clearly leads.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
AutoClerk does not list pricing publicly, which suggests it may provide customized quotes based on property size and needs. Its model likely includes licensing, support, and integration fees.
RoomRaccoon charges a flat $1,000 monthly fee, with no additional implementation costs, making budgeting straightforward for small hotels and independents. Its transparent pricing simplifies decision-making, especially for hotels prioritizing cost predictability.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, local, or prefers an easy-to-setup, all-in-one platform.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management, extensive integrations, or supports large chains.
AutoClerk delivers a broad, customizable PMS suitable for larger, multi-property hotels and chains. Its strengths lie in its flexibility, integrations, and advanced revenue management—ideal for hotels with complex operational needs.
RoomRaccoon excels as a user-friendly, all-in-one platform for small to medium-sized hotels, especially independents and boutique properties. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features make it the better choice for hotels seeking simplicity combined with automation.
If your hotel is a small independent seeking to grow efficiently without overwhelming complexity, RoomRaccoon is the clear winner. Conversely, if your operation involves multiple properties or requires advanced revenue tools, AutoClerk could better serve your needs.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Autoclerk (PMS) and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Autoclerk (PMS) and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Autoclerk (PMS) offers 8 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Autoclerk (PMS): No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AutoClerk, Inc. has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor