The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 375 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
AutoClerk, Inc. shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 375 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 372 |
After analyzing 375 verified reviews, AutoClerk, Inc. users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #54 0 reviews | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 reviews | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #67 0 reviews | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #64 0 reviews | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #57 1 reviews | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing between AutoClerk and Stayntouch boils down to your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and strategic goals. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. AutoClerk, with its simpler design, caters more to small to medium independent hotels, while Stayntouch’s extensive integrations and multi-property management make it a fit for larger chains and sophisticated operators. Which system aligns better with your current needs and future ambitions?
AutoClerk and Stayntouch both address core hotel management problems: reservation handling, guest data management, and operational efficiency. AutoClerk’s strengths lie in its straightforward interface and support, primarily serving small hotels and resorts, but it falls short in reporting and advanced feature sets. Conversely, Stayntouch offers a broad suite of tools, including revenue management, online check-in, and guest engagement, making it suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive, scalable solution.
The primary divergence is market coverage and feature depth. AutoClerk’s limited reviews and recent activity suggest a smaller, niche user base, while Stayntouch’s 317 reviews and recent feedback reflect broader adoption and ongoing improvements. So, if your hotel needs a simple, reliable PMS, AutoClerk might suffice. But for more complex operations or multi-property management, Stayntouch’s richer ecosystem is compelling. Are you ready for a scalable platform that grows with your hotel?
If your hotel is a small or independent property seeking basic reservation management and straightforward support, AutoClerk is a strong candidate. Its simple design and 24/7 support, praised by users, make onboarding and daily use manageable, especially if your team isn’t tech-savvy. However, if your hotel operates multiple properties, needs automated revenue management, or prioritizes guest self-service, Stayntouch’s 49 features—including online check-in, guest messaging, and group management—are more suited.
For hotel chains or expanding properties aiming for extensive integrations and mobile capabilities, Stayntouch’s open API and multi-property features deliver more value. AutoClerk’s limited feature set and small review count suggest it’s best for straightforward, small-scale operations, while Stayntouch’s broader adoption and feature depth support complex, growth-oriented hotels. Which profile matches your hotel’s current and future needs?
AutoClerk’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.33/5 rating and a simple, intuitive design, appreciated by small hotels for quick onboarding. Its support team is highly rated, with many reviews emphasizing prompt, 24/7 assistance. Still, some users find its interface could benefit from a modern update, and reporting remains a challenge.
Stayntouch scores even higher for usability at 4.7/5, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly screens, mobile app, and efficient onboarding. Customers report that staff learn the system quickly and that the platform requires minimal training. Its visual dashboards and contactless check-in options enhance operational flow, especially for larger teams. Edge: Stayntouch.
AutoClerk’s core offerings focus on basic PMS functions—reservation, guest profiles, and simple reporting—without many extras. It lacks advanced features like revenue management, mobile check-in, or group handling. In contrast, Stayntouch provides 49 features, including revenue management, online check-in, housekeeping modules, guest messaging, and integrated payment solutions, all designed to manage complex operations.
Stayntouch’s feature richness makes it more suitable for hotels that want a comprehensive platform. AutoClerk’s limited feature set is better suited for properties that need straightforward management without the complexity. The clear edge goes to Stayntouch for its broad, modern suite of tools.
AutoClerk’s reviews confirm support is available 24/7, with a 4.33/5 satisfaction rating. Users appreciate the prompt resolution and accessibility, but some note the interface could be more modern.
Stayntouch’s customer support scores 4.68/5, with reviewers praising the team’s responsiveness, onboarding, and ongoing support. Multiple reviews mention that their onboarding was smooth, and support was proactive in addressing issues. Stayntouch’s support reputation clearly surpasses AutoClerk’s. Edge: Stayntouch.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including SiteMinder and Intelity, focusing on core hospitality systems. Its limited integration options may restrict scalability, especially if your hotel relies on multiple third-party tools.
Stayntouch, with 188 verified partners, offers extensive integrations, including RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and others. Its open APIs and numerous partner connections support multi-system workflows, crucial for large or complex hotels. The clear winner: Stayntouch, delivering far more flexible and extensive system connectivity.
Stayntouch’s reviews, particularly recent ones, consistently rate it above 4.5/5, with users emphasizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and operational improvements. Its 26 reviews in the last 6 months bolster confidence in ongoing support and product evolution, reflected in a 94% likelihood to recommend.
AutoClerk, with only 3 reviews and a 63% recommendation rate, shows limited recent feedback. While users find support satisfactory, the overall rating suggests it’s less favored for broader or more modern hotel needs. The clear choice: Stayntouch, with higher and more recent ratings.
AutoClerk does not publicly disclose pricing, implying a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. Its lack of a free trial or transparent pricing suggests it may be more suitable for hotels with established budgets or specific requirements.
Stayntouch charges a base price of $800 per month, with no additional implementation or monthly per-room fees. Its transparent pricing and comprehensive feature set make cost management straightforward, especially for hotels planning for scaling.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to expand, needs advanced revenue management, or requires multi-property management. AutoClerk is best for properties that want a reliable but uncomplicated PMS.
Not ideal if you run a small property that only needs reservation handling, or if your budget is very tight, as the $800 monthly fee may be a barrier. Stayntouch excels for growing hotels and those with complex operational demands.
AutoClerk offers a simple, support-rich PMS tailored for small hotels and resorts that want straightforward operations. Its limited features and small review base suggest it’s suitable for properties with minimal complexity and a focus on basic management.
Stayntouch, with its extensive features, broad integrations, and high user ratings, appeals to larger properties, hotel chains, and those aiming for a future-proof system. It supports growth, multi-property management, and guest experience enhancements, making it the more versatile choice for ambitious hoteliers.
If your focus is on ease of use and support for a small-scale operation, AutoClerk could serve well. But if you need a system that scales, integrates deeply, and enhances guest engagement, Stayntouch is the clear choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Autoclerk (PMS) and Stayntouch share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Autoclerk (PMS) and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Autoclerk (PMS) offers 8 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 192. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Autoclerk (PMS): No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. AutoClerk, Inc. has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property