The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 100 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Backing the packers shines .
roommaster shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 100 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 100 |
After analyzing 100 verified reviews, Backing the packers users most value its , while roommaster users highlight customer support, reservation management, centralized data management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized Data Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud and Mobile Access
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report Generation
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Experience
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #30 26 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 54 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #31 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #32 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #22 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #34 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #24 15 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #27 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #10 62 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #29 11 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is a critical step for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. You’re evaluating Backing the packers and roommaster PMS, both designed to streamline hotel workflows but with distinct strengths. While Backing the packers offers AI-powered review insights, roommaster PMS provides a broad feature set with deep integrations and a solid user base. Which one truly aligns with your hotel’s needs?
Both products aim to improve how your team manages reservations, guest data, and operational insights, but they approach this differently. Backing the packers uses AI to analyze customer feedback and generate actionable insights, while roommaster PMS focuses on centralizing core hotel operations into a single platform. Do you need a review-focused AI tool or an operational management system?
Backing the packers has no recent reviews or a large user base, mainly offering AI analysis of guest feedback. In contrast, roommaster PMS boasts over 80 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.33-star rating, and a clear presence across multiple regions. The question is whether your hotel is looking for systematic feedback analysis or a robust management platform.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform to handle reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and financials, roommaster PMS is the clear choice. It’s suited for hotels seeking operational efficiency, especially with features like automated night audits, real-time reporting, and extensive integrations.
If, however, your team requires a system that distills customer reviews into insights to improve service quality and guest satisfaction, then Backing the packers could be more relevant. Yet, since it has no recent reviews or significant user feedback, roommaster remains the more proven option for comprehensive management.
Backing the packers has no publicly rated ease of use or onboarding data, which suggests limited user feedback or adoption. Conversely, roommaster PMS scores 4.22 out of 5 for ease of use, with numerous reviews praising its user-friendly interface and quick onboarding. Many users mention that staff find roommaster simple to learn, improving staff adoption rates.
Additionally, roommaster offers cloud access, facilitating remote management from anywhere, which is a significant benefit for larger or multi-property hotels. Given the review data, roommaster has a proven track record of being easier to implement and operate.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Backing the packers appears to focus solely on AI review analysis, with no specific features listed beyond this capability. In contrast, roommaster PMS offers over 60 features, including channel management, EPoS, revenue management, online booking, guest profiles, integrated payment processing, and more. Many of these features are absent from Backing the packers, which is not a full PMS solution.
Roommaster’s feature set supports every core aspect of hotel management, making it a comprehensive operational tool. Its extensive capabilities provide more value for properties needing broad functionalities.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Backing the packers has no publicly available support ratings or recent reviews, which raises questions about ongoing support quality. On the other hand, roommaster PMS scores 4.25 out of 5 for customer support, with many users highlighting quick responses and effective issue resolution.
Recent reviews mention support staff that are “quick to respond” and “easy to work with,” which is critical for resolving issues swiftly. Although some users note areas for improvement, overall roommaster’s support is more consistently praised.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Backing the packers has no recent reviews or hotel ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Conversely, roommaster has 83 reviews in the past six months, with an average rating of 4.33 out of 5, and a 91% likelihood to recommend.
Hotels across diverse segments, from boutique to resort properties, praise roommaster for operational efficiency and reliability. This recent, high volume of positive feedback makes roommaster the clearly preferred choice among hoteliers.
Edge: roommaster PMS.
Backing the packers does not list pricing details, which suggests limited transparency or that it may be a specialized AI tool rather than a full PMS. Roommaster PMS charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options.
Given the detailed pricing, you can budget for roommaster accordingly. The absence of clear pricing for Backing the packers limits its suitability for budget-conscious hotels seeking predictable costs.
Not ideal if you need comprehensive operational management, large-scale integrations, or regular review data, as Backing the packers offers no such features.
Not ideal if you require a full PMS platform or operational tools.
Not ideal if your hotel only needs a simple booking engine or standalone review analysis, as roommaster’s strength is in operational workflows, not just guest feedback.
Not ideal if you’re a small property with minimal management needs or limited budget for a comprehensive system.
The core difference lies in scope: roommaster PMS offers a full suite of hotel management features, while Backing the packers focuses solely on review analysis. If your goal is to streamline operations and generate actionable business reports, roommaster is the clear winner.
Choose roommaster if you value a broad feature set, high user satisfaction, and ongoing support. Opt for Backing the packers only if your primary concern is monitoring guest sentiments and online reputation, and you don’t need full operational management.
In conclusion, roommaster PMS stands out as the more reliable, feature-rich, and well-reviewed choice for hotels looking to optimize their day-to-day operations. Unless your hotel’s strategic priority is review insights alone, roommaster is the better investment.
Note: All data points are based on current reviews, ratings, and feature listings up to October 2023. For tailored quotes and demos, contact vendors directly.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Backing the packers and roommaster PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 48 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
What hoteliers love
While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and und... While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and understanding of user issues are needed for a more satisfying experience.
Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group... Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group bookings. However, some see room for improvement, particularly in handling rooming lists and group check-ins.
RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability o... RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability of hotel operations. Users appreciate having all reservations, guest information, and financial data in one secure platform, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creatin... RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creating and exporting reports, suggesting that enhancements could streamline analysis tasks.
Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, wh... Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, which can affect the seamlessness of using the software for daily tasks.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Backing the packers and roommaster PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Backing the packers offers 0 verified integration partners, while roommaster PMS offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. roommaster PMS leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Backing the packers: No. roommaster PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Backing the packers has an HT Score of 0 and roommaster has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor