The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Backing the packers shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 209 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, Backing the packers users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's daily operations, revenue, and guest experience. You’re weighing Backing the packers, a platform with a minimal online footprint and no recent reviews, against RoomRaccoon, a well-established PMS with a substantial, recent review base and a high user rating. Both aim to streamline your management tasks, but their approaches and capabilities differ sharply. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Your decision hinges on the specific challenges your hotel faces. Do you need a comprehensive, feature-rich PMS with proven support and extensive integrations? Or are you seeking an affordable, straightforward solution with a focus on automation and guest engagement? Let’s compare these two options on key points.
Backing the packers and RoomRaccoon serve different segments of the hotel management market. Backing the packers appears to be a nascent offering, with no recent reviews or clear market presence, and a score of zero from the HotelTechReport (HTR). Its lack of reviews and unverified features make it hard to assess reliability or effectiveness.
In contrast, RoomRaccoon boasts 169 reviews, a recent review count of five within the last six months, and a high score of approximately 80 out of 100. Guests consistently rate it highly for ease of use, customer support, and value, with recommendation rates around 94%. RoomRaccoon is clearly a mature, tested platform with proven results.
Are you comfortable adopting an unreviewed, possibly untested solution? Or do you prefer a platform backed by recent user feedback and a track record of delivering value? The choice becomes evident once you compare their market presence and user satisfaction.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, fully integrated PMS with features like channel management, booking engine, revenue management, and guest CRM, go with RoomRaccoon. Its suite of 51 exclusive features addresses the core operational challenges small to midsize hotels face daily.
However, if your hotel only requires a minimal management tool—perhaps just a basic booking platform or a review analysis service—and you’re comfortable with limited features, Backing the packers might suffice. Given its lack of recent reviews and verified features, RoomRaccoon remains the safer, more reliable choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and growth.
RoomRaccoon enjoys a high ease-of-use rating of 4.74 out of 5, with many reviewers highlighting its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and minimal staff training requirements. Users report that staff quickly adapt and that automation reduces daily manual tasks, freeing up your team for guest service.
Backing the packers, lacking substantial review data and user feedback, offers no clear guidance on usability. With no recent reviews or usability scores, assessing its user-friendliness is impossible.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon provides a rich feature set of 51 functionalities, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, integrated payments, mobile app, guest CRM, automated night audit, and online check-in. These features address operational, revenue, and guest experience needs comprehensively.
Backing the packers offers no visible features or integrations based on available data, indicating a likely limited scope. Without concrete features or recent updates, it’s difficult to see how it matches RoomRaccoon’s versatility.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support scores 4.53 out of 5, with recent positive comments about responsiveness and helpfulness. Many users appreciate their proactive assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
On the other hand, Backing the packers has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to gauge its support quality or responsiveness. Given RoomRaccoon’s strong recent support feedback, it’s clearly better suited to assist your team when issues arise.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon boasts 88 verified integrations, including major hospitality tech partners like Sage, RevControl, Paxxio, and others. This extensive ecosystem enables seamless connection with your existing systems, simplifying management and data flow.
Backing the packers offers no verified integrations, suggesting limited or no connectivity with other platforms. If integrations matter for your operations, RoomRaccoon’s ecosystem is a decisive advantage.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews yield an overall rating of approximately 4.88 out of 5, with a 94% likelihood of recommendation, reflecting high satisfaction across diverse property types, especially boutique hotels and small independents. Reviewers frequently mention increased bookings, revenue, and operational efficiency.
Backing the packers has no recent reviews or ratings, making comparison impossible. Its lack of feedback signals a limited user base and uncertain performance.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Backing the packers does not publicly disclose pricing, and no trial or subscription model is available based on current data. Its lack of transparency makes budget planning difficult.
RoomRaccoon charges a base fee of $1,000 per month with no free tier or trial, which may be a consideration for small hotels. The fee covers its extensive feature set, offering predictable costs for comprehensive management.
RoomRaccoon offers a well-rounded, feature-rich PMS with proven user satisfaction, extensive integrations, and a clear path to operational efficiency. Its recent reviews and high ratings demonstrate it’s trusted by hundreds of hoteliers to grow revenue and simplify management.
Backing the packers, lacking recent validation and measurable features, does not provide enough confidence for active hotels seeking reliable, scalable solutions. It may serve niche needs or very small operations but falls short for broader hotel management.
If you want a trusted, comprehensive system that’s been proven in the market, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. For hotels comfortable with unverified, minimal offerings and no recent reviews, Backing the packers might be considered, but risks are higher.
This comparison aims to help you confidently decide which platform aligns with your hotel’s current needs and future growth plans.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Backing the packers and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Backing the packers and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Backing the packers offers 0 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Backing the packers: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Backing the packers has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor