The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 128 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bakuun.com Ltd shines .
eRevMax shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like PMS connectivity and Analytics dashboard.
Side-by-side ratings based on 128 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 128 |
After analyzing 128 verified reviews, Bakuun.com Ltd users most value its , while eRevMax users highlight support team, operational efficiency, rate parity. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate Parity
▾
|
|
|
+
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 21 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 59 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 35 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #10 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #8 52 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #7 55 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #7 35 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #9 17 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #9 40 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 14 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #3 42 reviews |
Choosing the right channel management platform is critical for your hotel’s online distribution and revenue management. Both Bakuun and RateTiger aim to streamline these processes, but they approach the challenge very differently. Bakuun offers a holistic platform focusing on expanding distribution and simplifying payments, while RateTiger emphasizes real-time synchronization, extensive integrations, and detailed analytics. Your decision hinges on your specific operational needs and growth ambitions.
Bakuun’s all-in-one platform caters to hotels seeking to expand globally with simplified payment solutions, whereas RateTiger’s strength lies in its proven, extensive network of integrations and real-time channel updates. Which aligns more with your current priorities?
Bakuun is designed to serve hotels looking for a unified platform that combines distribution, contracting, and payments, making it ideal for hotels aiming to scale internationally without juggling multiple systems. RateTiger, by contrast, excels at ensuring real-time rate and availability updates across over 400 OTAs, GDS, and meta search channels, making it a top choice for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and revenue optimization.
Both products address distribution, but RateTiger’s key advantage is its large partner network and real-time connectivity, while Bakuun’s strength lies in its comprehensive travel tech stack that simplifies cross-border payments and content management. If your hotel needs a broad reach coupled with simplified financial processes, Bakuun is a compelling choice. If maintaining rate parity and managing extensive channel connections is your primary goal, RateTiger is more suitable.
Bakuun’s interface and user experience details are not explicitly rated or reviewed, but its all-in-one approach indicates a potentially steeper learning curve, especially given its broader scope. RateTiger boasts a high ease of use rating at 4.39/5, backed by numerous positive reviews praising its user-friendly interface, fast onboarding, and straightforward rate and inventory management.
Hoteliers consistently commend RateTiger’s intuitive platform and quick setup, whereas Bakuun’s comprehensive features may require more time for staff to adopt effectively. Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger offers a robust set of 10 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, multi-currency support, and multi-lingual capabilities. Bakuun, by contrast, does not list any exclusive features, instead positioning itself as an all-encompassing travel platform that simplifies distribution and payments.
While Bakuun’s platform covers contracting, content, integrations, and secure payments, RateTiger’s advanced features support detailed revenue management, rate intelligence, and extensive partner connectivity. For feature depth and specialization, edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger’s support and onboarding ratings are high, at 4.61/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, responsive service and reliable support teams. One hotelier noted, “The support team is very efficient — the connection process was fast, and support always responds quickly,” reflecting consistent positive experiences.
Bakuun’s support rating is not available, but given its smaller user base and limited review data, it’s difficult to assess support quality. RateTiger’s longstanding presence and extensive customer feedback give it a distinct edge here. Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger boasts 70 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS, and PMS systems, with 5 shared integrations with Bakuun. It works closely with key players like Booking.com, Expedia, and Google, offering extensive reach for hotels.
Bakuun has 22 verified partners, including regional and global channels, but fewer overall integrations. Its focus is more on consolidating distribution and simplifying payments rather than offering the vast partner network RateTiger provides. Edge: RateTiger.
With over 115 reviews, RateTiger’s overall rating stands at 4.7/5, indicating strong satisfaction among hoteliers across various segments. Recent reviews praise its reliability, ease of use, and extensive network of channels.
Bakuun, lacking review data and a rating, cannot compete on user satisfaction. Given the large volume and recency of RateTiger’s reviews, hoteliers clearly favor it. Edge: RateTiger.
Bakuun charges a flat rate of $200 per month with no additional implementation or setup fees, making it straightforward and predictable. Pricing details for RateTiger are not publicly listed, which is common for enterprise-grade channel managers; pricing is typically customized based on hotel size and needs.
If budget transparency is critical, Bakuun offers clarity, but RateTiger’s value is rooted in its extensive capabilities, often reflected in tailored pricing.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
RateTiger’s core strength is its extensive network of over 70 integrations, real-time updates, and proven user satisfaction, making it the choice for hotels focused on operational efficiency and revenue growth. Bakuun aims to serve hotels seeking a broad, integrated travel platform that simplifies payments and distribution for international expansion but lacks the user feedback and review volume of RateTiger.
If your hotel needs a trusted, well-supported channel manager with a large partner ecosystem, go with RateTiger. If your goals are centered around expanding globally with a streamlined platform that combines distribution and payments, Bakuun deserves serious consideration.
For most hoteliers, especially those with a focus on distribution, revenue management, and operational reliability, RateTiger’s more extensive reviews and recent performance data make it the safer, more proven choice.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Bakuun and RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| PMS connectivity |
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
What hoteliers love
Although the product's support team receives overall positive feedback, some users suggest improvements for quicker issue resolution and consistent av... Although the product's support team receives overall positive feedback, some users suggest improvements for quicker issue resolution and consistent availability.
The integration between eRevMax's Booking Engine and Channel Manager has enhanced operational efficiency by streamlining booking processes.
Maintaining rate parity across all OTAs is noted as a significant benefit, ensuring that guests see consistent pricing regardless of booking platform,... Maintaining rate parity across all OTAs is noted as a significant benefit, ensuring that guests see consistent pricing regardless of booking platform, which boosts trust and potentially occupancy rates.
Where hoteliers push back
Reviews mention recurring technical issues like synchronization problems and availability update failures, though users acknowledge that support is pr... Reviews mention recurring technical issues like synchronization problems and availability update failures, though users acknowledge that support is prompt in handling such cases.
The comprehensive reporting and analytics tools are praised for providing valuable insights into booking trends, enabling hotels to make data-driven d... The comprehensive reporting and analytics tools are praised for providing valuable insights into booking trends, enabling hotels to make data-driven decisions to maximize revenue and optimize strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bakuun and RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Bakuun offers 22 verified integration partners, while RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) offers 70. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bakuun: No. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bakuun.com Ltd has an HT Score of 0 and eRevMax has 67. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor