The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 179 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Bowo shines when it comes to guest experience enhancement , with exclusive features like Mobile Checkin and Guest Profiles.
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to customer service — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
Side-by-side ratings based on 179 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 112 | 67 |
After analyzing 179 verified reviews, Bowo users most value its guest experience enhancement, customer support, customization and personalization, while Crave Interactive users highlight customer service, user interface, customization. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest experience enhancement
▾
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
+
Customer support
▾
|
+
User interface
▾
|
|
+
Customization and personalization
▾
|
+
Customization
▾
|
|
+
Backend usability
▾
|
+
Guest communication
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Hardware issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Seamless system integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Back-end system
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 42 reviews | #6 13 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 51 reviews | #9 26 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #6 15 reviews | #4 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #13 2 reviews | #5 7 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 56 reviews | #6 26 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 74 reviews | #5 31 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 23 reviews | #4 27 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #5 11 reviews | #10 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 12 reviews | #4 26 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #4 88 reviews | #8 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #14 1 reviews | #8 2 reviews |
| Middle East | #5 3 reviews | #8 1 reviews |
Choosing the right guest app for your hotel involves weighing the features, user experience, and support each platform offers. Bowo’s Guest App facilitates detailed personalization and integration, while Crave’s platform emphasizes guest engagement through a broad set of features that work across various hotel types. Both aim to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction but diverge significantly in their approach and maturity. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s current needs and future plans?
Are you looking for a solution that prioritizes customization and revenue opportunities or one that emphasizes ease of use and broad functionality? The answer hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and strategic focus.
Bowo and Crave serve different hotel profiles, though both aim to improve guest engagement and streamline operations. Bowo is tailored for properties seeking deep personalization, extensive integrations, and upselling tools, making it ideal for upscale or boutique hotels aiming to differentiate through digital services. Crave, with its comprehensive, easy-to-navigate platform, suits a wide range of hotels—from luxury to mid-market—that want reliable service automation and operational efficiency.
However, Bowo’s review count and recent feedback strongly favor its ongoing development and user satisfaction, giving it a clear edge. Both platforms aim to enhance guest experiences but do so through contrasting techniques: Bowo emphasizes customization, while Crave focuses on simplicity and broad feature sets. Given the data, is your hotel prepared to prioritize advanced personalization or prefer a straightforward, reliable guest engagement solution?
If your hotel needs intensive customization, personalized guest interactions, and deep integration with property management systems, Bowo is the better fit. It’s especially suitable for luxury and boutique hotels that want to craft unique digital experiences, as evidenced by its high customer satisfaction (ratings up to 4.75/5) and 99 reviews, the majority recent.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, quick deployment, and a broad set of features like contactless ordering, QR codes, and payment integrations, Crave is the superior choice. Its more extensive feature list (16 in total vs Bowo’s 2) and higher overall rating (4.75/5 from 48 reviews, all recent) indicate a more mature, widely adopted platform.
In summary, choose Bowo if customization and personalization lead your priorities. Opt for Crave if operational simplicity and broad feature coverage are more important.
Bowo boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.87/5 from nearly 100 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Clients frequently mention how quickly staff adopt the platform and how guests find it simple to navigate, even emphasizing its ergonomic design.
Crave, rated at 4.61/5 from 48 reviews, is also praised for its user-friendly interface, especially for the guest-facing app. Reviewers highlight the platform’s simplicity, but some mention that the back-end system could be more modern and faster to navigate.
Edge: Bowo.
Crave’s platform offers 16 unique features, including Web-based access, QR codes, Apple Pay, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, POS integration, and upselling capabilities—features absent in Bowo. These functionalities enable a variety of guest services, from food ordering to contactless checkouts, allowing hotels to automate many operational tasks.
Bowo provides only 2 unique features—Mobile Check-in and Guest Profiles—focused on personalization and streamlined check-in processes. While these are valuable, Crave’s broader feature set provides more tools for operational automation and guest engagement.
Edge: Crave.
Bowo’s customer support receives a nearly perfect rating of 4.85/5 from 99 reviews, with hoteliers noting its personalized, proactive approach and quick response times. Many reviews describe support staff as available, helpful, and capable of resolving issues promptly, which greatly enhances user confidence.
Crave’s support, rated at 4.79/5 from 48 reviews, is also highly regarded, with users praising its quick responses and helpful staff. However, some reviews mention that the back-end system’s complexity could benefit from more intuitive support documentation.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo integrates with 31 verified partners, including major PMS, CRM, and distribution systems such as Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and HiJiffy. Its extensive list allows for seamless connectivity with hotel management ecosystems, reducing manual data entry and operational silos.
Crave offers 17 verified integrations, including popular systems like Simphony, Kipsu, and InfoGenesis. While sufficient for many properties, its smaller partner network limits options for some hotels with niche or complex management setups.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo’s review score (0/5 from 97 reviews) is based on a larger, more recent set of feedback, emphasizing its ease of use, support, and customization. Hoteliers in diverse segments, especially luxury and boutique hotels, rate Bowo highly for its personalized approach and integration capabilities.
Crave’s reviews, from a smaller and slightly older set, rate the platform at 4.75/5, with many praising its reliability and feature breadth. The more recent reviews for Crave affirm its solid performance across hotel segments but lack the volume and recency that bolster Bowo’s credibility.
Given the larger review base and recent feedback, the clear edge goes to Bowo.
Bowo’s pricing is listed at a flat rate of $600, with no freemium options, monthly fees, or implementation costs mentioned. Its straightforward pricing makes budgeting predictable.
Crave charges a base price of $400, with no additional monthly or implementation fees listed. Without detailed pricing tiers or additional costs, both platforms seem accessible, but Bowo’s higher flat fee might reflect its broader customization and integration offerings.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Bowo and Crave target different hotel needs—while Bowo emphasizes personalization, deep integration, and upselling, Crave offers a broad, easy-to-use platform that covers essential guest service automation. The choice depends on your hotel’s strategic priorities: do you want to craft a unique digital experience or streamline operational processes?
Choose Bowo if your hotel is upscale, boutique, or highly personalized, and you need a flexible system that integrates with your existing tech stack. It’s ideal for properties that want to stand out through tailored guest journeys and advanced revenue tools.
Opt for Crave if your hotel values quick deployment, ease of use, and a wide array of features covering everyday guest needs. It suits properties seeking operational reliability and a platform that works well across multiple departments without extensive customization.
In conclusion, for hotels with a focus on advanced personalization and integration, Bowo is the definitive choice. For those prioritizing operational simplicity and extensive feature coverage, Crave stands out as the more mature, reliable platform.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Bowo - Guest App and Crave Mobile Platform share 9 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Apple Pay | ||
| Credit Card Payments | ||
| Digital Menu | ||
| Guest Profiles | ||
| In-Venue Ordering | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| QR Codes | ||
| Web Based (Appless) |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The application helps me grow all the hotel's secondary points of sale, whether it's the SPA, catering, or even concierge activities. It also enables us to incorporate additional e..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We've managed to build a guest journey that's very intuitive and quite extraordinary."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews emphasize how Bowo improves the overall guest experience by providing all information about the hotel in one place, making it easy for gu... Many reviews emphasize how Bowo improves the overall guest experience by providing all information about the hotel in one place, making it easy for guests to access and book services directly through the tablet placed in their rooms.
Bowo’s customer support receives high praise for being responsive and helpful. Users appreciate the specific account managers who are always ready to... Bowo’s customer support receives high praise for being responsive and helpful. Users appreciate the specific account managers who are always ready to assist with any issues or customizations.
Reviews mention the high degree of customization available on the platform, allowing hotels to tailor the app to their brand’s look and feel, which en... Reviews mention the high degree of customization available on the platform, allowing hotels to tailor the app to their brand’s look and feel, which enhances the guest experience.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and pr... Crave Interactive provides exceptional customer service with quick response times and helpful support staff. Hoteliers appreciate the efficient and proactive support, which helps in resolving issues promptly.
While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customiza... While the user interface is appreciated for being user-friendly and intuitive for guests, some feedback suggests it could be more modern and customizable to better fit individual hotel needs.
Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users ex... Customization options, especially for menu updates and guest interfaces, are limited and often require support from Crave Interactive's team. Users express a desire for more control over customizations.
Where hoteliers push back
Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall effici... Several reviews mentioned concerns with the hardware, specifically tablet durability and charging difficulties. These issues can affect overall efficiency and guest satisfaction when using the system.
The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing man... The system's integration with other hotel management systems, such as Simphony and PMS, is highlighted for making operations smoother and reducing manual entry. This has been particularly beneficial during large events and for managing room services efficiently.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Bowo - Guest App and Crave Mobile Platform share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Bowo - Guest App offers 31 verified integration partners, while Crave Mobile Platform offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Bowo - Guest App leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Bowo - Guest App: No. Crave Mobile Platform: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Bowo has an HT Score of 39 and Crave Interactive has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor