The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 25 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
Noovy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 25 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 25 |
After analyzing 25 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while Noovy users highlight ease of use, customer service, automated payment processing. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Payment Processing
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct OTAs Integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Tools
▾
|
|
|
−
Translation Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #39 11 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #38 12 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #38 14 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #54 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #52 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Europe ▾ | — | #22 23 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #16 2 reviews |
Choosing between Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Noovy PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in scope, user experience, and market presence. Cambridge PMS is a traditional, enterprise-focused platform with limited reviews, while Noovy offers a modern, all-in-one solution with robust customer feedback. Do you want a proven, established system or a newer, highly-rated platform?
Cambridge PMS is designed to serve larger, more complex properties and resorts, whereas Noovy caters to small to mid-sized hotels, boutique properties, and independent operators. The core difference lies in their feature sets and market reach, which will influence your decision based on size and complexity. Are you seeking a flexible, scalable system or a straightforward, user-friendly platform?
Cambridge PMS, by Shiji, provides a traditional property management backbone with a focus on deep integration for large-scale operations. Its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest limited current customer engagement, which can be a red flag for ongoing support and feature updates. Conversely, Noovy boasts a recent, high review count (19 reviews in the last six months) with a 5-star overall rating and a 99% likelihood to recommend, indicating a highly satisfied user base.
While Cambridge PMS offers no recent reviews to gauge current performance, Noovy’s recent customer feedback highlights ease of use, excellent support, and a comprehensive feature set. The contrast suggests Noovy is more aligned with contemporary hotel needs, especially for independent or smaller properties. Is a modern, well-supported system more critical for your property today?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich platform that combines PMS, channel management, booking engine, and revenue management in one, Noovy is the clear choice. Its user-friendly interface, high customer satisfaction, and extensive integrations make it suitable for hotels prioritizing automation and guest experience improvements.
On the other hand, if your property operates at a larger scale with complex requirements and prefers a traditional system with robust reporting and enterprise features—albeit with limited recent customer feedback—Cambridge PMS might appeal. However, given its lack of recent reviews and low market presence, Noovy’s modern approach and strong recent ratings make it the safer pick for most hoteliers looking to grow.
Noovy’s user rating of 4.84 out of 5, based on 19 recent reviews, reflects a highly intuitive system that most users find easy to adopt. Customers praise its straightforward onboarding, simple interface, and minimal training needs, with many describing it as “reliable,” “fast,” and “friendly.” Support is frequently described as “excellent,” with quick, responsive assistance.
Cambridge PMS, with a rating of zero, provides no recent user feedback to evaluate usability. Its lack of reviews and limited information about onboarding or user experience suggest it may not be as accessible for modern hotel teams. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s platform includes 48 unique features, such as channel management, integrated CRS, online booking engine, housekeeping module, revenue management, mobile app, guest CRM, digital registration, and automated reminders—covering nearly every aspect of hotel operations. Its features are tailored for efficiency, automation, and guest engagement.
Cambridge PMS offers no specific features or modules, indicating a possible absence of comprehensive functionality. Its limited scope and the absence of recent updates or detailed feature lists suggest it may lack the breadth and depth that hoteliers now expect. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s support rating of 4.89 out of 5, based on recent reviews, underscores its commitment to customer satisfaction. Users describe its support as “friendly,” “reliable,” and “responsive,” with round-the-clock availability.
Cambridge PMS offers no recent review data or support ratings, which raises concerns about ongoing vendor engagement and post-sales support. Without current feedback, it’s difficult to verify its service quality. Given the high praise for Noovy’s support, edge: Noovy.
Noovy integrates with 40 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment providers, and revenue tools such as Otelier, SiteMinder, and RevControl. Its open APIs and broad integration ecosystem facilitate smooth automation and data sharing.
Cambridge PMS, with only 1 verified partner (Duetto), offers limited connectivity options. This restricts its adaptability for hotels seeking a plug-and-play, multi-channel environment. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s recent reviews showcase a consistent 5-star rating, with hoteliers praising its ease of use, support, and comprehensive features. The 19 reviews in the last six months demonstrate current, positive user experiences across diverse property types, especially boutique and city hotels.
Cambridge PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess current user sentiment. The lack of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its ongoing performance. Therefore, edge: Noovy.
Cambridge PMS does not publicly disclose pricing details, suggesting a potential custom quote or enterprise-level fee. This opacity can complicate budgeting and decision-making.
Noovy charges a straightforward €£$5 per room per month, with no implementation fees, and includes round-the-clock support. It offers a transparent, affordable pricing model that appeals to small and mid-sized hotels. Edge: Noovy.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cambridge PMS is a traditional, enterprise-focused system designed for larger, complex properties. Its lack of recent reviews and limited market presence suggest it may not be suitable for hotels that want modern features, easy onboarding, and active support.
Noovy provides a highly-rated, modern platform with extensive features that cover all key operational areas for small to mid-sized hotels. Its recent reviews and high support ratings make it the safer, more appealing choice for most hoteliers today.
If your hotel values ease of use, quick onboarding, customer satisfaction, and a transparent pricing structure, Noovy is the clear winner. Its comprehensive feature set and strong market presence position it as the platform to grow with.
Choose Cambridge PMS if you need a large-scale, customizable solution with specific legacy requirements. For most hotels looking to streamline operations and improve guest experiences today, Noovy is the better fit.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and Noovy PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 36 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews praise the system's ease of use, noting its user-friendly design and intuitive interface which makes training new staff quick and reduces... Many reviews praise the system's ease of use, noting its user-friendly design and intuitive interface which makes training new staff quick and reduces operational errors.
Excellent customer service is frequently mentioned, with users appreciating quick responses and effective resolutions, contributing to overall satisfa... Excellent customer service is frequently mentioned, with users appreciating quick responses and effective resolutions, contributing to overall satisfaction with the product.
The system facilitates automatic payment requests and processing, drastically simplifying billing and reducing error rates. This feature is also appre... The system facilitates automatic payment requests and processing, drastically simplifying billing and reducing error rates. This feature is also appreciated for its efficiency in handling non-refundable bookings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the software's functionality but note that the design is slightly outdated, though a redesign is anticipated to address this issue.
The software offers robust reporting tools that provide insights into various aspects of hotel operations, aiding in better management decisions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and Noovy PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while Noovy PMS offers 40. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Noovy PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. Noovy PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and Noovy has 71. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property