The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 100 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
roommaster shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 100 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 100 |
After analyzing 100 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while roommaster users highlight customer support, reservation management, centralized data management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized Data Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud and Mobile Access
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report Generation
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Experience
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #30 26 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 54 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #31 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #32 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #22 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #34 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #24 15 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #27 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #10 62 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #29 11 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between Cambridge PMS by Shiji and roommaster PMS hinges on your hotel's size, operational needs, and regional footprint. While both aim to streamline hotel management, they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Cambridge PMS, with zero reviews and no recent data, currently offers no tangible evidence of performance. Conversely, roommaster boasts over 80 reviews, recent updates, and a clear reputation for operational efficiency. Which system aligns better with your current priorities?
Cambridge PMS presents as a comprehensive, yet unreviewed platform, leaving your team uncertain about its real-world performance. roommaster, on the other hand, is well-rated, trusted by diverse hotel segments, and actively used worldwide. So, should your choice be based on proven user satisfaction or the promise of a new, untested solution?
Both products aim to improve hotel operations, but their approaches differ. Cambridge PMS by Shiji appears to be a broad, integrated platform, yet it lacks recent reviews or user feedback to validate its effectiveness. roommaster is a specialized, widely adopted system praised for its centralized data management, automation, and extensive reporting capabilities.
While Cambridge PMS offers no concrete evidence of performance or user satisfaction, roommaster’s 83 reviews in the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.33/5, provide confidence in its ability to meet hotel needs. This strong recent feedback suggests that roommaster is actively evolving and addressing hotel challenges.
In essence, if you prioritize a system with proven, current user backing, roommaster clearly holds the advantage. Are you willing to trust an unreviewed platform, or do you prefer a solution with clear, recent validation?
If your hotel needs an operational backbone with proven user satisfaction, go with roommaster. Its extensive features, active user base, and recent positive reviews make it a reliable choice for properties seeking efficiency, automation, and real-time reporting.
If your hotel is exploring a potentially integrated platform with no current reviews or proven track record, Cambridge PMS might be worth considering—though it offers no evidence of performance at this time. For hotels prioritizing stability and proven functionality, roommaster is the safer, more reliable option.
For independent hotels, multi-property operators, or hotels looking to modernize with a well-supported system, roommaster’s extensive experience and positive feedback serve as a decisive advantage. Does your hotel need a tested solution with a track record, or are you comfortable exploring a lesser-known platform?
roommaster’s user reviews highlight its intuitive interface and ease of onboarding, with a 4.22/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent feedback. Users praise its straightforward reservation management, automation, and cloud access, which make daily tasks less cumbersome.
Cambridge PMS, with a 0/5 rating for ease of use and no reviews, provides no clear indication of its user experience. The absence of recent feedback or user satisfaction metrics suggests uncertainty about how easily your team could adapt to its interface.
Edge: roommaster.
roommaster offers a comprehensive suite with 60 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, guest profiles, integrated POS, digital registration, and more. It covers every operational aspect, with extensive customization and automation capabilities.
Cambridge PMS claims to be a full property management system but provides no listed features or unique offerings. Its lack of visible functionalities and zero feature count make it impossible to compare directly.
Clearly, roommaster’s feature set is more extensive and tangible. If you need a system with proven capabilities, roommaster’s 60 features give it a significant edge.
Edge: roommaster.
roommaster’s support ratings are high, at 4.25/5, with users praising quick responses and effective problem-solving. One review notes, “The customer support to solve issues is quick and easy,” indicating strong service levels.
Cambridge PMS, with a 0/5 support rating and no reviews, provides no recent evidence of support quality. This uncertainty may pose risks if your team encounters issues needing prompt resolution.
Given the current data, roommaster’s customer support is clearly more reliable and proven. Edge: roommaster.
roommaster boasts 56 verified integrations, including channel managers, booking engines, and payment systems, with many tailored for North American and international markets. Its broad partner network enhances operational flexibility.
Cambridge PMS only lists one verified partner, offering no details on integration options. This severely limits its ability to connect with other tools, essential for modern hotel operations.
roommaster’s extensive integration ecosystem makes it more adaptable to your existing tech stack. Edge: roommaster.
roommaster’s recent reviews show a strong 4.33/5 rating from 83 reviewers, with particular praise for its ease of use, customer support, and features. Hotels across segments—from boutique to resorts—highlight its efficiency and reliability.
Cambridge PMS’s rating is 0/5 based on no reviews, making current user sentiment impossible to gauge. Without recent feedback, it’s risky to assume it will meet your needs.
Given the active, positive reviews, roommaster clearly has higher user-rated satisfaction. Edge: roommaster.
roommaster charges a flat implementation fee of $500, with no ongoing monthly fees listed, but details on subscription or licensing are limited. Cambridge PMS offers no pricing information, indicating potential custom quotes or unavailability.
The lack of transparent pricing for Cambridge PMS complicates comparison, but the known flat fee for roommaster suggests straightforward budgeting.
If cost transparency is critical, roommaster’s pricing structure offers clarity—Cambridge PMS’s pricing remains uncertain.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
roommaster stands out as a well-established, feature-rich property management system with a proven track record and active user base. Its broad integration capabilities, recent positive reviews, and robust support make it a dependable solution for most hotels.
Cambridge PMS, lacking reviews and feature details, remains an uncertain option. If your hotel values proven performance and current user satisfaction, roommaster is the clear choice.
Choose roommaster if you need a system that’s already tested and trusted by your peers. Consider Cambridge PMS only if you’re prepared to test a new platform without recent feedback or proven results.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and roommaster PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 48 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
What hoteliers love
While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and und... While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and understanding of user issues are needed for a more satisfying experience.
Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group... Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group bookings. However, some see room for improvement, particularly in handling rooming lists and group check-ins.
RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability o... RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability of hotel operations. Users appreciate having all reservations, guest information, and financial data in one secure platform, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creatin... RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creating and exporting reports, suggesting that enhancements could streamline analysis tasks.
Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, wh... Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, which can affect the seamlessness of using the software for daily tasks.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and roommaster PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while roommaster PMS offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. roommaster PMS leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. roommaster PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and roommaster has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor