The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 395 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] shines .
ThinkReservations shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 395 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 395 |
After analyzing 395 verified reviews, Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] users most value its , while ThinkReservations users highlight customer support, operational efficiency, data and reporting. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Data and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with OTAs
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Pricing and Fees
▾
|
|
|
−
Security Features
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 145 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #9 25 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #6 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #5 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #7 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #7 70 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #7 24 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #11 8 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #1 386 reviews |
| Europe | — | #57 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #32 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #32 0 reviews |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to find a platform that simplifies operations, boosts revenue, and enhances guest experiences. Cambridge PMS by Shiji and ThinkReservations PMS both aim to address these needs but approach them differently. While Cambridge PMS is a less-reviewed, more traditional system, ThinkReservations offers a highly-rated, feature-rich platform with recent, abundant reviews. Given the review volume and recent positive feedback, ThinkReservations currently holds a stronger market presence.
Are you prioritizing ease of use, extensive features, or proven customer satisfaction? Let’s compare these two options to see which better suits your hotel’s needs.
Cambridge PMS, by Shiji, appears as a less-reviewed, less-rated solution with zero recent reviews, raising questions about its current support and usability. In contrast, ThinkReservations has over 350 reviews, with the last six months showing four new reviews, all highly positive, indicating active support and ongoing development. The lack of recent feedback for Cambridge PMS suggests it may not be as reliable or current.
The core problem both systems aim to solve is streamlining hotel operations—booking, guest management, and reporting. Cambridge PMS’s limited review data and no recent feedback make it difficult to gauge its effectiveness today. Conversely, ThinkReservations’s recent reviews consistently praise operational efficiency, support, and ease of use. Do you want a system with established reputation and active community feedback?
If your hotel requires a straightforward, easy-to-use platform with a proven track record of customer satisfaction, go with ThinkReservations. Its 4.88/5 rating and 356 reviews demonstrate strong, recent positive sentiment, especially from small to mid-sized properties like B&Bs, inns, and boutique hotels. ThinkReservations is ideal if streamlining operations and increasing revenue are priorities.
If, however, your hotel demands a highly customizable, enterprise-level system with extensive integration options and regional support in multiple countries, Cambridge PMS might be considered. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited features (only one verified partner, Duetto) suggest it may not be the best fit for fast-paced, modern hotels wanting active vendor support. Given the current data, ThinkReservations clearly leads in suitability for most hoteliers.
ThinkReservations boasts a 4.82/5 ease-of-use rating from over 350 reviews, with many users highlighting its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and staff adoption. Reviewers frequently mention how quickly staff can get up to speed and how the platform streamlines daily tasks. Support is consistently rated highly, with users describing the team as accessible, knowledgeable, and helpful.
Cambridge PMS’s ease of use cannot be reliably assessed due to no recent reviews or ratings, which is a red flag for hotels needing a user-friendly, current platform. Without active user feedback, confidence in its usability remains uncertain.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers 39 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, EPoS, online check-in, guest messaging, automated night audit, multi-currency, and more—covering nearly every operational need for a modern hotel. It also supports guest communication, digital registration, and real-time reporting, making it a comprehensive solution.
Cambridge PMS, on the other hand, provides no specific features or modules listed, with only one verified integration (Duetto). This suggests it may lack the depth and versatility of ThinkReservations’ suite. If advanced features and integrations are critical, ThinkReservations has a clear edge.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations consistently receives 4.82/5 ratings from over 350 reviews, with users praising its fast, accessible, and knowledgeable support team. Many reviews mention how support helped resolve issues quickly and how onboarding was smooth, even for non-tech-savvy staff.
Cambridge PMS’s support quality cannot be gauged due to no recent reviews or ratings. Without current feedback, it’s tough to assess whether it offers the same level of responsive, effective customer service.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations offers 16 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, Airbnb, Triptease, and TrustYou, along with built-in payment processing and channel management. Its API and partnership network support a broad range of tools, enabling seamless connectivity.
Cambridge PMS, with only one verified partner (Duetto), provides limited integration options, which could restrict your ability to connect with other essential systems. For most hotels aiming for a flexible, connected setup, ThinkReservations is the better choice.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
ThinkReservations has a high overall rating of 4.88/5 based on 356 reviews, with recent reviews emphasizing operational efficiency, excellent support, and revenue growth. Small properties, like B&Bs and inns, repeatedly praise how it streamlines booking and guest management.
Cambridge PMS’s rating is zero, with no reviews to support its effectiveness or hoteliers’ satisfaction. This makes it impossible to compare, but the lack of recent reviews suggests it is not currently favored or actively supported.
Edge: ThinkReservations.
Cambridge PMS does not list pricing, likely indicating a bespoke or enterprise quote is required. This makes direct comparison difficult and suggests it may be more expensive or less transparent.
ThinkReservations charges a flat fee of $500 per month, with no implementation or setup fees. Its transparent pricing and straightforward model make budgeting easier for small and mid-sized hotels.
Overall, ThinkReservations provides clear, predictable costs, making it easier to assess value.
Cambridge PMS is best suited for:
Not ideal if:
ThinkReservations is ideal for:
Not ideal if:
Cambridge PMS positions itself as a comprehensive, enterprise-focused platform with limited recent feedback, making its current performance and support uncertain. It may serve larger hotels or chains that need extensive customization and are prepared for bespoke solutions.
ThinkReservations, with over 350 recent reviews and a 4.88/5 rating, clearly demonstrates its effectiveness for small and mid-sized properties. Its ease of use, robust features, and active support make it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today.
If you prioritize a proven, highly-rated solution with ongoing support, go with ThinkReservations. For larger, complex operations looking for deep customization and regional availability, Cambridge PMS could be considered, but with caution given the limited recent feedback.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Cambridge PMS and ThinkReservations PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"I became aware of ThinkReservations at a trade show in the US, and I could see right away that it would help Blue Tang Inn streamline our operations, increase our booking and upsel..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"ThinkReservations Digital Registration has streamlined our check in process, making my job so much easier. Being able to ask guests for their ID and credit card ahead of time, agre..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We try to take care of all the needs of our guests so that they have an experience rather than just a stay"
What hoteliers love
Though already noted as excellent by many, a few reviews express the desire for additional support on weekends to better handle urgent inquiries.
ThinkReservations aids in streamlining operations through digital registration, night audits, and easy management of booking and check-in processes, a... ThinkReservations aids in streamlining operations through digital registration, night audits, and easy management of booking and check-in processes, allowing staff to focus more on guest interactions.
The system offers comprehensive data and reporting features, enabling hoteliers to make informed decisions on pricing, guest satisfaction, and strateg... The system offers comprehensive data and reporting features, enabling hoteliers to make informed decisions on pricing, guest satisfaction, and strategy planning.
Where hoteliers push back
Some reviews highlight issues with the pricing structure, including dissatisfaction with channel manager fees and the high price of features like Thin... Some reviews highlight issues with the pricing structure, including dissatisfaction with channel manager fees and the high price of features like ThinkMessenger.
Mandatory two-step authentication is a point of frustration for some users, who find it burdensome and wish for lower security settings.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cambridge PMS and ThinkReservations PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cambridge PMS offers 1 verified integration partners, while ThinkReservations PMS offers 16. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ThinkReservations PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cambridge PMS: No. ThinkReservations PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] has an HT Score of 0 and ThinkReservations has 89. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor