The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 41 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
CENTROTEL shines .
HotelRunner shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Automated reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 41 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 41 |
After analyzing 41 verified reviews, CENTROTEL users most value its , while HotelRunner users highlight customer support, ease of use, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| CENTROTEL |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with OTAs
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Features
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | CENTROTEL |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 16 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #29 9 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #31 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #25 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | CENTROTEL |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #18 22 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #28 9 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #31 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #33 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | CENTROTEL |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #26 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #22 12 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #1 16 reviews |
Choosing a booking engine is crucial for your hotel's revenue and operational efficiency. Both CENTROTEL by CENTROTEL and HotelRunner’s Booking Engine aim to streamline reservations and improve guest management, but they approach this goal differently. CENTROTEL, with no current reviews or global presence, appears to be a less proven option, whereas HotelRunner boasts extensive recent reviews, a high user rating, and a broad international footprint. How do these differences impact your decision?
CENTROTEL, despite its name, has no recent reviews, ratings, or active user feedback, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness or reliability. HotelRunner, by contrast, has over 40 recent reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.5 out of 5, and a 96% likelihood to recommend, signaling strong user satisfaction. If your priority is proven performance backed by recent user experiences, HotelRunner clearly stands out.
Both products promise to handle reservations and facilitate direct bookings, but HotelRunner additionally offers a wider array of features like multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and extensive OTA integrations. CENTROTEL's lack of verified integrations and reviews raises questions about its ability to meet the needs of dynamic, multi-channel environments. Would you prefer a platform with a proven track record or one that remains largely untested?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich booking platform with proven success across multiple regions and hotel types, go with HotelRunner. Its extensive, recent reviews highlight ease of use, support, and a comprehensive set of tools ideal for boutique hotels, villas, and city-center properties. For hotels seeking a cost-effective or niche solution without a proven track record, CENTROTEL might be considered, but the lack of reviews makes this a risky choice.
HotelRunner is especially suited for hotels prioritizing direct bookings, online visibility, and multi-channel management. CENTROTEL, on the other hand, offers no clear advantages given its unverified status. When choosing, consider whether you value a platform with proven reliability and features or if you're willing to experiment with an unreviewed product.
HotelRunner’s user interface scores 4.73 out of 5, with high marks for ease of onboarding and ongoing management, supported by detailed recent reviews praising its user-friendly design. Users frequently mention how simple it is to sync rates, manage channels, and customize the booking process, with many accessing support via WhatsApp for quick help.
CENTROTEL provides no data on usability, onboarding, or user feedback, making it impossible to assess its ease of use. Given the detailed positive reviews of HotelRunner’s intuitive platform, the edge clearly goes to HotelRunner for usability.
HotelRunner offers over 40 features including mobile responsiveness, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, automated reporting, booking abandonment tools, social media integration, and more. Its flexible rate plans and rich customization options support diverse hotel types and booking strategies.
CENTROTEL, by contrast, provides no unique features or functionalities as evidenced by its lack of reviews and feature offerings. The sheer breadth of HotelRunner’s feature set makes it the better choice for hotels seeking advanced tools and customization options. The edge here is definitively in favor of HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s support scores 4.8 out of 5, with recent reviews praising prompt, helpful assistance via multiple channels, including WhatsApp. Users appreciate the ongoing training and quick resolution of issues, contributing to high satisfaction.
CENTROTEL offers no support data, reviews, or user feedback, leaving its support quality an unknown. Given HotelRunner’s clearly documented support strengths and high ratings, the edge goes to HotelRunner.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Agoda, and Airbnb, along with property management systems like protel and Oracle Hospitality. Its wide integration network enables seamless connection across channels and platforms.
CENTROTEL has no verified integration partnerships, limiting its connectivity options. If multi-channel management and integration are priorities, HotelRunner’s extensive ecosystem clearly surpasses CENTROTEL. Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner has a 4.5/5 overall rating, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature richness. Its user base includes boutique hotels, villas, and city-center properties, with an average review score of 4.44/5 among hotel segments.
CENTROTEL reports no reviews, ratings, or recent user feedback, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Based on current data, HotelRunner’s higher ratings and recent positive reviews give it the competitive edge.
CENTROTEL’s pricing information is unavailable, with no trial, freemium, or monthly options listed. HotelRunner charges a flat $100 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for CENTROTEL, HotelRunner offers clearer value and budget planning options. The cost advantage favors HotelRunner.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in proven performance: HotelRunner is a well-established, feature-rich platform with a broad global presence and extensive recent reviews. CENTROTEL, without reviews or integrations, offers no clear evidence of effectiveness or reliability, which is risky for active hoteliers.
If your hotel needs a trusted, comprehensive booking engine with proven support, features, and integrations, go with HotelRunner. It provides peace of mind, operational tools, and a track record of satisfied users.
Choose CENTROTEL only if you are exploring new solutions without critical dependence on proven functionality or extensive integrations—though this is a gamble for most hotels.
For most hotels looking to grow direct bookings, streamline distribution, and ensure reliable support, HotelRunner is the definitive choice.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| CENTROTEL |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, CENTROTEL and Booking Engine by HotelRunner share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | CENTROTEL |
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Pooled inventory | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Tariffs |
Showing top differences. 28 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Customer support receives accolades for being responsive and efficient. Users appreciate the prompt assistance via various communication channels, inc... Customer support receives accolades for being responsive and efficient. Users appreciate the prompt assistance via various communication channels, including WhatsApp.
The platform is noted for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making set-up and management straightforward for hoteliers of varied tec... The platform is noted for its user-friendly interface and ease of navigation, making set-up and management straightforward for hoteliers of varied technical expertise.
Users praise Hotelrunner for its strong channel management capabilities, allowing seamless synchronization with numerous OTAs. This eliminates double... Users praise Hotelrunner for its strong channel management capabilities, allowing seamless synchronization with numerous OTAs. This eliminates double bookings and simplifies inventory management.
Where hoteliers push back
The integrated booking engine is highly regarded for driving direct bookings and allowing customization of packages. Many users appreciate the ease of... The integrated booking engine is highly regarded for driving direct bookings and allowing customization of packages. Many users appreciate the ease of creating OTAs listings, contributing to increased occupancy and revenues.
Users highlight the need for more robust and customizable reporting tools to aid in rate strategy decisions, reflecting a critical area for future imp... Users highlight the need for more robust and customizable reporting tools to aid in rate strategy decisions, reflecting a critical area for future improvement.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. CENTROTEL and Booking Engine by HotelRunner share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. CENTROTEL offers 0 verified integration partners, while Booking Engine by HotelRunner offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Booking Engine by HotelRunner leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
CENTROTEL: No. Booking Engine by HotelRunner: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. CENTROTEL has an HT Score of 0 and HotelRunner has 74. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor