The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 44 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ChargeAutomation shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like GlobalPayments (Credit Card Processing) and Lobby Kiosk.
FRIVA shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 44 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 44 | 0 |
After analyzing 44 verified reviews, ChargeAutomation users most value its payment processing, contactless check-in, customer support, while FRIVA users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
FRIVA |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Payment Processing
▾
|
|
|
+
Contactless Check-in
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Upselling Features
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Customer Reviews
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
FRIVA |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 13 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 16 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #6 5 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 1 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
FRIVA |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #6 9 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #10 6 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain | #9 4 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
FRIVA |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #4 19 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 20 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #5 2 reviews | — |
When evaluating contactless check-in solutions, your hotel needs a system that enhances guest experience, streamlines operations, and provides reliable support. ChargeAutomation’s online check-in platform offers a suite of features tailored for hotels and vacation rentals, while mySimpleClient is primarily a CRM tool with some guest management functions. Given your focus on seamless contactless check-in, ChargeAutomation addresses this need directly with a comprehensive, dedicated solution.
ChargeAutomation boasts a significantly larger user base, more recent reviews, and a broader feature set aimed explicitly at contactless check-in. Is your hotel seeking a proven, feature-rich contactless check-in platform with extensive support? Or are you looking for a CRM that may help with guest engagement but lacks specific check-in functionalities? This decision hinges on your operational priorities.
ChargeAutomation and mySimpleClient serve different core purposes. ChargeAutomation is a contactless check-in and upselling platform designed specifically for hoteliers, while mySimpleClient focuses on customer relationship management and client feedback analysis. ChargeAutomation’s primary goal is to automate pre-arrival processes, reduce manual work, and generate revenue through upselling.
In contrast, mySimpleClient offers tools for managing customer data, gathering reviews, and providing actionable insights, but it does not specialize in online check-in. The key divergence is that ChargeAutomation is built specifically for contactless check-in workflows, with features like ID verification, secure payments, and digital gate access. Does your hotel need a dedicated check-in system, or are you seeking a broader CRM that supports guest engagement?
ChargeAutomation’s ability to automate security deposits, provide a digital guest portal, and integrate with door lock systems makes it the more suitable choice for contactless check-in. Will your hotel benefit from a platform explicitly designed for these tasks versus a CRM with limited check-in features?
If your hotel needs a contactless check-in solution with extensive automation, ChargeAutomation is the clear choice. It’s ideal for hotels and vacation rentals seeking to reduce front desk traffic, automate ID verification, and increase revenue through upselling. It’s especially recommended if operational efficiency and guest safety are top priorities.
If your team requires a CRM that consolidates guest feedback, improves communication, and provides insights into customer satisfaction, mySimpleClient could be helpful. However, the lack of specific check-in features means it’s not suited for streamlining guest arrivals or digital access. For contactless check-in, ChargeAutomation offers proven, targeted functionality, while mySimpleClient is better suited for customer relationship management outside the check-in process.
In summary, choose ChargeAutomation if you want a dedicated contactless check-in and upselling platform. Opt for mySimpleClient only if your focus is on broader guest engagement and feedback management, not digital check-in.
ChargeAutomation’s ease of use scores an impressive 4.71 out of 5, based on 42 recent reviews, with users highlighting its user-friendly interface and quick onboarding process. Reviews mention that the platform is "powerful & extremely easy to use" and praise its straightforward guest verification and payment automation features.
In comparison, mySimpleClient scores a 0/5 in ease of use, with no recent reviews or user feedback available. Its interface and onboarding experience are unspecified, but given the absence of reviews, confidence in its usability remains unverified. The lack of accessible user feedback indicates that ChargeAutomation’s user experience is more established and trusted.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation offers over 30 exclusive features tailored specifically for contactless check-in, including ID verification, secure payments, security deposits, digital guidebooks, device-agnostic check-in, and door lock integration. It also supports custom questions, multi-lingual options, and pre-arrival upselling, making it a comprehensive solution.
mySimpleClient, on the other hand, does not list any specific features related to contactless check-in or guest management, focusing solely on CRM and review analysis. Its feature set is not detailed in the source material, implying it may lack the specialized tools hotel operators require for seamless digital arrivals.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation’s customer support scores an impressive 4.9 out of 5, based on recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Review quotes mention "speedy responses" and "friendly support," underscoring its reliability during onboarding and troubleshooting.
In contrast, mySimpleClient has no available support ratings or recent reviews, leaving its customer service reputation unverified. Given the importance of prompt assistance in implementing check-in systems, ChargeAutomation’s support standing makes it the safer choice.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation has verified integrations with 18 partners, including RoomRaccoon, HotelTime, Sirvoy, Guesty, Mews, and Oracle Hospitality, allowing smoother workflows within existing hotel tech stacks. It also connects with multiple payment processors like Stripe, Chase, and Heartland, further supporting automation.
mySimpleClient has no listed integrations, limiting its functionality to internal CRM and review analysis. Without compatible integrations, your hotel might face operational silos or manual data entry, reducing efficiency.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation has a total of 42 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support, and feature completeness. Its NPS score of 9.81 out of 10 and a 98% likelihood to recommend showcase high user satisfaction.
mySimpleClient has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge hotelier satisfaction. Given the established user feedback for ChargeAutomation, it clearly holds higher reputation among hoteliers.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
ChargeAutomation’s pricing starts at a flat fee of $200 per month, with no free tier or trial, making it transparent and predictable. The source indicates no additional implementation costs, simplifying budgeting.
Pricing details for mySimpleClient are unavailable, suggesting it may have a different or customized pricing structure. Without clear pricing, evaluating the value proposition is difficult, but ChargeAutomation’s transparent fee makes cost comparison straightforward.
Edge: ChargeAutomation.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a CRM with no focus on check-in or if you operate entirely offline.
Not ideal if you need a dedicated contactless check-in platform or require extensive integrations.
ChargeAutomation is a tailored contactless check-in platform with a proven track record, extensive features, and high hotelier satisfaction. It excels in automating guest verification, secure payments, and upselling, making it an excellent choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and revenue growth.
mySimpleClient offers valuable CRM and review analytics but lacks specialized tools for digital check-in and integrations, making it less suitable if your primary goal is contactless arrivals. It might complement existing systems but doesn’t replace dedicated check-in solutions.
If your hotel prioritizes a reliable, feature-rich contactless check-in system backed by positive reviews and strong support, ChargeAutomation is the clear recommendation. For broader customer engagement and feedback management, consider mySimpleClient, but only as part of a larger tech ecosystem focused elsewhere.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
FRIVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and mySimpleClient share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
FRIVA |
|---|---|---|
| Chase (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| First Data (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Heartland (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Multi-Processor Gateway | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
| Vantiv (Credit Card Processing) |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it mini... The software's automated payment processing feature is praised for handling payments, security deposits, and chargebacks. Users appreciate how it minimizes fraud and error, saving time and reducing labor costs. Payment automation facilitates smoother operations and enhances financial security for both hotels and guests.
ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to co... ChargeAutomation simplifies the check-in process with its robust contactless solution. Reviews frequently highlight how the system allows guests to complete check-in remotely, reducing front desk traffic and wait times. This feature is especially beneficial in minimizing manual work, improving operational efficiency, and creating a better guest experience.
While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional sup... While support is generally praised for being responsive and helpful, a few reviews noted the need for improvements in response time and additional support personnel. Good support is crucial for resolving issues quickly, thereby affecting the overall experience.
Where hoteliers push back
A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest po... A critical point raised by some users is the need for more customization options. Reviews mention limitations in the ability to customize the guest portal, email formats, and other interfaces. This lack of flexibility can impact how well the software meets specific needs of different properties.
Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms a... Although several reviews highlight how ChargeAutomation seamlessly integrates with Property Management Systems (PMS), there are also some criticisms about its PMS connectivity. Users report issues like synchrony problems and the need for more flexible information transfer capabilities.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in and mySimpleClient share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in offers 18 verified integration partners, while mySimpleClient offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ChargeAutomation Online Check-in leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ChargeAutomation Online Check-in: No. mySimpleClient: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. ChargeAutomation has an HT Score of 24 and FRIVA has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor