The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
FRIVA shines .
MyStay shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, FRIVA users most value its , while MyStay users highlight contactless check-in, guest experience, guest communication. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| FRIVA |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed and Performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | FRIVA |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 15 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #8 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | FRIVA |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | FRIVA |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #7 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 32 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 2 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 2 reviews |
Choosing between mySimpleClient by FRIVA and MyStay Check-in hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both solutions aim to improve contactless check-in processes but diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. With more recent reviews and a larger user base, MyStay offers a more tested experience, but understanding their differences helps clarify which product aligns best with your hotel.
Are you seeking a simple contactless solution or a comprehensive guest journey platform? Let’s examine how each addresses these goals.
mySimpleClient by FRIVA is primarily positioned as a customer relationship management (CRM) tool with contactless check-in capabilities. It aims to enhance client interaction through consolidated feedback, automated communications, and analytics to foster stronger customer relationships.
MyStay Check-in, on the other hand, is designed as an all-in-one contactless check-in and check-out platform. It automates guest registration, document signing, and bill settlement, focusing on operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Both products solve the problem of reducing physical contact and streamlining guest processes, but they approach it differently. mySimpleClient offers deeper customer insights, while MyStay emphasizes operational automation and integration. Which core problem is more pressing for your hotel?
If your hotel needs a CRM-driven platform to improve guest communication, gather feedback, and increase guest loyalty, go with mySimpleClient. Its strengths lie in client relationship management, analytics, and customer engagement, making it suitable for hotels prioritizing guest experience and data insights.
If your priority is reducing staffing costs, eliminating queues, and automating check-in/out processes, choose MyStay. Its advanced features like PMS integration, digital payments, and guest segmentation support operational efficiency and revenue growth. For properties seeking a full contactless journey, MyStay provides a more extensive set of tools.
Ultimately, for a more recent and highly-rated platform with a broad feature set, MyStay is the recommended choice. Which of these core hotel needs aligns better with your current priorities?
MyStay Check-in boasts a high ease-of-use rating at 4.91/5, with many users citing its intuitive interface and quick setup. Support reviews highlight a smooth onboarding process, and the platform's automation features are praised for reducing staff training time.
mySimpleClient has a 0/5 rating in ease of use, with no recent reviews to suggest user satisfaction. Its interface and onboarding process are less documented, suggesting it may require more effort to implement and adopt.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay offers 14 unique features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, multi-channel communication, digital payments, door lock integration, kiosks, and self-service check-in/out. These features facilitate a comprehensive, contactless guest journey and operational management.
mySimpleClient provides no additional features beyond CRM and review summarization, focusing more on customer insight than operational automation. Its limited feature set makes it less suitable for properties seeking a full contactless solution.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay's customer support scores nearly 5/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Review quotes mention "prompt technical support" and "high support quality," which is notable given the platform's recent reviews and large user base.
mySimpleClient has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess support quality. With no documented feedback, it’s unsafe to assume comparable support levels.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including PMS systems like Priority Software, Kwentra, and RoomRaccoon, as well as channel managers and hotel management tools. These integrations support seamless operations and data flow across platforms.
mySimpleClient has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems and reducing operational efficiency.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay's reviews are recent, totaling 40 in the last six months, and it holds a 5/5 overall rating. Hotels across Europe, North America, and beyond praise its ease of use, features, and support.
mySimpleClient has zero reviews, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The absence of recent feedback diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Edge: MyStay.
mySimpleClient's pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may lack transparent or standardized costs. It might involve customized quotes or integration fees, but this remains unclear.
MyStay charges $400 per month, with no trial or implementation fees. Its transparent pricing and straightforward model make budgeting easier for hotels.
Edge: MyStay.
Not ideal if you need a full operational platform or extensive automation.
Not ideal if your focus is solely guest relationship management without operational automation.
MySimpleClient is centered around customer relationship management, offering insights and review summaries that help refine guest engagement. Its lack of recent reviews and features suggest it may not meet the demands of modern, contactless hotel operations.
MyStay Check-in provides a full suite of contactless check-in/out features, with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high user ratings. It is best suited for hotels that want to streamline operations, reduce costs, and enhance guest satisfaction through automation.
For properties prioritizing operational efficiency and contactless guest journeys, MyStay is the clear choice. If your hotel’s main focus remains on guest relationships and feedback, and you can manage without extensive automation, mySimpleClient might suffice.
In conclusion, the more recent reviews, higher ratings, and broader feature set make MyStay the stronger contender for most hotels seeking a reliable, scalable contactless check-in solution.
According to HTR's product database, mySimpleClient and MyStay Check in share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | FRIVA |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary Product Merchandising | ||
| Guest Segmentation & Targeting | ||
| Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| Room Upgrade Merchandising | ||
| Segmentation |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates th... Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates the check-in process, allowing guests to complete it before arrival, and reducing physical contact. Users appreciate the ease of use and efficiency it brings to their operation.
Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival con... Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival convenience, imparting a feeling of personalized and attentive service. Hoteliers noticed higher guest satisfaction as a direct outcome.
Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, a... Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, and after their stay through automated messages. This feature enhances guest satisfaction by providing timely information and resolving queries promptly.
Where hoteliers push back
Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire... Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire more flexibility in adjusting texts, graphics, and automatic messaging formats to better suit their specific needs.
MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration... MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration helps hoteliers manage guest data and operations more effectively. However, some users did encounter occasional syncing issues between MyStay and their PMS.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. mySimpleClient and MyStay Check in share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. mySimpleClient offers 0 verified integration partners, while MyStay Check in offers 30. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MyStay Check in leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
mySimpleClient: No. MyStay Check in: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. FRIVA has an HT Score of 0 and MyStay has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor