The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acantech shines .
OpenHotel shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Acantech users most value its , while OpenHotel users highlight customer support, user-friendly pms, continuous updates and improvements. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acantech |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly PMS
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous Updates and Improvements
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct OTA Connections
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Financial Processing
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Tools
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acantech |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 36 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #39 11 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #50 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #21 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acantech |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #37 16 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #45 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #28 9 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #43 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acantech |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #14 54 reviews |
Choosing between Chr365 by Acantech and OpenHotel PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, as both aim to streamline daily operations. Chr365, developed by Acantech, offers a basic property management solution but lacks recent reviews, ratings, and features. Conversely, OpenHotel PMS boasts a comprehensive suite of tools, positive recent reviews, and widespread adoption, making it the more proven option for most hoteliers.
Your decision should focus on whether you need an all-in-one platform or a more limited, niche solution. Are you prioritizing ease of use and advanced features? Or are you seeking a basic system with minimal complexity? Let’s examine the key factors.
Chr365 by Acantech is designed as a simple property management system but is currently unreviewed, with no recent feedback or ratings. This makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance or reliability, especially compared to OpenHotel PMS, which has 57 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.81/5.
OpenHotel has consistently positive feedback highlighting its intuitive interface, extensive features, and excellent support, leading to a high NPS score of 9.53/10. Its reviews emphasize that users find it user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, revenue, and guest communication.
Given the lack of recent data on Chr365, can you confidently rely on its capabilities? Or is it safer to choose a platform with a proven track record and recent user feedback?
If your hotel needs a tried-and-true, feature-rich property management system capable of handling multi-channel distribution, revenue management, and guest engagement, OpenHotel PMS is the clear pick. Its extensive feature set includes a channel manager, booking engine, revenue modules, and integrations with key partners, making it suitable for mid-sized to larger properties.
On the other hand, if your hotel operates on a limited budget, with minimal complexity or additional needs, Chr365 might seem appealing, but the absence of recent reviews and detailed features makes it risky. Without concrete evidence of its performance, OpenHotel remains the safer, more reliable choice for most properties.
OpenHotel PMS earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.71/5, supported by detailed reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward navigation, and helpful onboarding. Users mention that even new staff can quickly adapt to the system, reducing training time.
Chr365, lacking recent reviews or ratings, offers no clear data on usability. Its absence from recent feedback suggests it may not be as polished or user-friendly as OpenHotel.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
OpenHotel features 23 distinct modules, including a channel manager, revenue management, online support, digital registration, and guest communication tools. These features directly support revenue growth, operational efficiency, and guest experience.
Chr365 offers no documented features or modules, making it impossible to compare feature depth or quality. Its limited or nonexistent feature set further diminishes its appeal.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
OpenHotel’s customer support is rated 4.82/5, with recent reviews emphasizing prompt, helpful, and friendly service. Users appreciate the ongoing updates and proactive communication, which help streamline hotel operations.
Chr365, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no verifiable support experience. The lack of recent feedback suggests support quality is untested or unproven, making OpenHotel the safer choice for assistance and onboarding.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
OpenHotel offers integrations with 12 verified partners, including major OTAs and technology providers like SiteMinder, RateGain, and Canary Technologies. These integrations facilitate smoother operations and better distribution management.
Chr365 has no verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or channels. This lack of connectivity could hinder operational efficiency and scalability.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
There are no recent reviews for Chr365, so user ratings or satisfaction levels are unavailable. Conversely, OpenHotel has a 4.81/5 overall rating based on 57 recent reviews, with a 95% likelihood to recommend and high satisfaction across hotel segments.
Given the recent reviews and ratings, OpenHotel clearly outperforms Chr365 from a user perspective, indicating greater reliability and satisfaction.
Edge: OpenHotel PMS.
Both products do not publicly disclose transparent pricing models. However, OpenHotel offers a straightforward subscription-based model with no hidden fees or per-booking charges, according to user reviews.
Chr365’s pricing remains unverified, complicating budget planning and comparison. Without concrete cost information, OpenHotel’s value proposition appears more predictable.
Given the lack of recent performance data, Chr365 is best suited for very small or budget-conscious properties with minimal operational complexity.
OpenHotel’s broad feature set and strong user feedback make it suitable for most hotel types seeking a comprehensive, reliable PMS.
The core difference lies in scale and proven performance: OpenHotel has a robust feature set, recent positive reviews, and high customer satisfaction, whereas Chr365 lacks recent feedback and detailed capabilities.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported PMS with extensive features, OpenHotel is the clear choice. Its comprehensive modules and positive reviews support operational efficiency and growth.
Choose Chr365 only if you operate a very small property with minimal needs, and risk is acceptable without recent performance data. For most hotels, especially those looking to grow and improve guest experiences, OpenHotel’s proven track record makes it the smarter investment.
In summary, OpenHotel offers a complete, well-rated solution backed by recent reviews and a broad set of features. Chr365 remains an uncertain choice, lacking recent data and documented capabilities. Prioritize proven reliability and support—your hotel’s operations depend on it.
According to HTR's product database, Chr365 and OpenHotel PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acantech |
OpenHotel
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
The open availability and responsiveness of customer support teams are highly appreciated among users. Many specifically mentioned the helpfulness of... The open availability and responsiveness of customer support teams are highly appreciated among users. Many specifically mentioned the helpfulness of the team during emergencies and the seamless transition to OpenHotel PMS. This support aids in smooth operations, especially during peak seasons or system transitions.
Many users appreciate how easy it is to navigate and use OpenHotel's PMS. The system is intuitive, even for first-time hotel clerks, and it offers sea... Many users appreciate how easy it is to navigate and use OpenHotel's PMS. The system is intuitive, even for first-time hotel clerks, and it offers seamless transitions from other systems. Users note it is particularly effective for small to medium-sized properties because of its flexible booking grid and comprehensive layout.
Users appreciate that OpenHotel is consistently improving and adding features based on user feedback. This dedication ensures the system stays up-to-d... Users appreciate that OpenHotel is consistently improving and adding features based on user feedback. This dedication ensures the system stays up-to-date with industry standards and evolving hotel needs. Notifications about these updates are shared through inbox notifications, making it convenient for users to stay informed.
Where hoteliers push back
While many appreciate the detailed and comprehensive reporting options available in OpenHotel, there is a recurring request for customizable reports a... While many appreciate the detailed and comprehensive reporting options available in OpenHotel, there is a recurring request for customizable reports and improved metrics suited to specific properties. Some users find current reports cluttered with unnecessary information and have suggested enhancements to better meet their needs.
Users noted that OpenHotel has efficient financial processing modules, including organized views of financials, customizable financial reports, and in... Users noted that OpenHotel has efficient financial processing modules, including organized views of financials, customizable financial reports, and integration with external fiscal systems. However, enhancements are suggested, particularly around real-time tax reporting and card payment interventions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Chr365 and OpenHotel PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Chr365 offers 0 verified integration partners, while OpenHotel PMS offers 12. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. OpenHotel PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Chr365: No. OpenHotel PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acantech has an HT Score of 0 and OpenHotel has 16. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor