The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 98 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Clock shines when it comes to ease of use and accessibility — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Centralized Messaging and Guest App.
DJUBO shines , with exclusive features like Native Email Marketing and Revenue Management Module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 98 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 79 | 19 |
After analyzing 98 verified reviews, Clock users most value its ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, customer service and support, while DJUBO users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Connectivity
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile and User Interface
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #21 19 reviews | #31 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #14 28 reviews | #43 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #17 2 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #5 5 reviews | #25 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #18 30 reviews | #31 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #18 14 reviews | #31 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #15 15 reviews | #39 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #16 8 reviews | #31 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #17 11 reviews | #33 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #9 38 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #12 4 reviews | #10 3 reviews |
| Middle East | #18 2 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Djubo by DJUBO hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but Clock’s extensive feature set and larger user base make it a more established choice for hospitality businesses seeking robust integration and comprehensive functionality. Djubo, on the other hand, offers a streamlined all-in-one platform with a focus on control and visibility, particularly suited for multi-property operations.
Your team must decide whether you prioritize a mature, feature-rich solution with wide regional reach or a more consolidated platform designed for straightforward management. Do you need a system that scales with complex operations or one that simplifies everything into a single dashboard? Which platform better aligns with your current growth plans?
Both Clock and Djubo serve as all-in-one management systems. Clock’s core strength is its extensive feature set, including reservations, rates, invoicing, front desk, housekeeping, guest messaging, booking engine, and integrated restaurant POS. It also offers online check-in, guest portals, card payment automation, and analytics without additional fees, making it ideal for hotels requiring a comprehensive, versatile system.
Djubo concentrates on unifying core hotel functions—PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and back-office operations—into a single platform, emphasizing control and real-time visibility. While Djubo offers fewer features, it covers essential hotel management needs efficiently, especially for independent and multi-property hotels seeking a simplified, unified approach.
Since Clock boasts 63 reviews with recent activity (5 reviews in the last 6 months) and a high overall rating (4.88/5), it benefits from fresher, more diverse user feedback. Djubo’s 19 reviews, though slightly older and less recent, show a near-perfect 5/5 rating. Does your hotel need a more established platform with recent user insights or are you comfortable with a smaller, highly-rated system?
If your hotel needs a versatile solution that supports extensive integrations, dynamic pricing, and features like online check-in, guest messaging, and detailed analytics, Clock is the better fit. Its broad partner network and regional presence make it suitable for hotels aiming for a scalable, feature-rich platform.
If your team prioritizes a unified, control-driven system with straightforward operations, especially if managing multiple properties, Djubo’s all-in-one approach will serve you well. Its focus on visibility, control, and ease of use simplifies daily tasks and helps maximize revenue without the complexity of multiple disconnected tools.
In summary, choose Clock if you value depth of features and integration, and opt for Djubo if your hotel needs simplicity with comprehensive real-time control. Which of these priorities is more critical for your hotel’s current strategy?
Clock scores a solid 4.73/5 for ease of use, with users praising its straightforward navigation and support, but noting initial setup can be complex. Reviewers mention, “The usability of the system saved us a lot of time,” and “It’s easy to navigate once you get used to it,” though some find the interface a bit dated.
Djubo surpasses Clock with a 4.95/5 rating for ease of use, and reviewers frequently highlight its intuitive design and supportive onboarding. Comments like “Very easy to use supportive staff” and “Speedy onboarding” reinforce its user-friendly reputation.
Edge: Djubo.
Clock offers 37 shared features plus 12 unique features, including gift vouchers, centralized user management, guest app, online checkout, shift planning, integrated payment terminals, GDPR compliance, and SOC2 certification. Its extensive feature set caters to hotels seeking a broad, flexible management platform.
Djubo provides 37 shared features and 5 unique ones, including native email marketing, revenue management, automated night audit, guest communication via SMS, and a mobile app. Its focus on revenue and guest engagement tools makes it suitable for hotels wanting integrated marketing and revenue control.
Edge: Clock, for its broader feature set and compliance credentials.
Clock’s support scores a 4.78/5, with users appreciating responsiveness and quick problem resolution. Review quotes include “Excellent support that deals with queries efficiently” and “The support team is responsive and helpful,” though some note that complex issues can take longer.
Djubo’s support ratings are slightly lower at 4.76/5 but still highly regarded. Users praise “Supportive staff and always available,” although a few mention that pricing for long-term clients could be more flexible.
Edge: Clock.
Clock boasts 111 verified partners, including prominent integrations like Tripadvisor, Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, and Profitroom. Its extensive partner network allows deep customization and connectivity across different systems.
Djubo has just 3 verified partners, with notable integrations including Tripadvisor and Simplotel. Its limited integration options may restrict flexibility but keep the platform straightforward.
Edge: Clock.
Clock’s latest reviews show a 4.88/5 rating with 63 reviews, and recent ratings in the last six months reinforce its positive reputation. Users rate it highly for revenue growth, ease of use, and support, especially in North America and Europe.
Djubo has a perfect 5/5 rating from 19 reviews, though fewer are recent. Its users, mainly in India, praise its control and simplicity but lack regional diversity in feedback.
Edge: Clock.
Clock’s pricing begins at $600 monthly for its core features, with no freemium options, implementation fees, or hidden costs. It’s transparent about its pricing structure, suitable for hotels ready to invest in a comprehensive system.
Djubo’s pricing isn’t publicly listed, and costs likely vary based on modules and hotel size. Both platforms do not specify free trials or upfront fees, but Clock’s clear pricing may appeal to hotels with strict budgets.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, plug-and-play solution or has minimal operational complexity.
Not ideal if you need a highly customizable system with deep third-party integrations or are operating in regions with limited support.
Clock HMS by Clock offers a comprehensive, highly integrated management platform that appeals to hotels with complex needs across diverse operations. Its extensive feature set and regional presence make it well-suited for hotels looking for depth, compliance, and scalability.
Djubo by DJUBO provides an easy-to-use, control-focused platform ideal for hotels wanting an all-in-one solution that simplifies daily operations and enhances revenue opportunities. Its streamlined approach is best for hotels that prioritize control and visibility over customization.
Choose Clock if you require a broad, feature-rich system with a large partner network and regional reach. Opt for Djubo if your hotel needs a straightforward, unified platform that’s quick to implement and easy to operate, especially if you are managing multiple properties.
In conclusion, for most hotels with recent reviews and a larger footprint, Clock’s maturity and extensive features make it the preferable choice. However, if simplicity and ease of use are your top priorities, Djubo remains a compelling option.
According to HTR's product database, Clock HMS and Djubo share 37 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated night audit | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Revenue Management Module |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
Clock PMS+ offers reliable customer support, noted for fast and responsive assistance. Although generally praised, there is feedback regarding occasio... Clock PMS+ offers reliable customer support, noted for fast and responsive assistance. Although generally praised, there is feedback regarding occasional incorrect guidance and the need for expert advice. Users suggest improvements in experiential guidance and support for complex functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Though Clock PMS+ covers core analytics needs, many users indicate a desire for improved, customizable reporting. This includes integrating with Excel... Though Clock PMS+ covers core analytics needs, many users indicate a desire for improved, customizable reporting. This includes integrating with Excel and providing more detailed financial analyses and operational metrics. Some users find the existing reports inadequate and cumbersome to compile comprehensive insights from.
Users have expressed interest in more customization options and flexible settings to meet specific hotel needs. While generally satisfied, some users... Users have expressed interest in more customization options and flexible settings to meet specific hotel needs. While generally satisfied, some users note the desire to modify reports and interface settings to better support dynamic operations and marketing strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Clock HMS and Djubo share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Clock HMS offers 111 verified integration partners, while Djubo offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Djubo leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Clock HMS: No. Djubo: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Clock has an HT Score of 79 and DJUBO has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor