The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 216 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to ease of use and guest experience — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Hoteza shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 216 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 22 |
After analyzing 216 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while Hoteza users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | #7 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | #7 8 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | #5 4 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | #3 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | #7 13 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | #6 16 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | #8 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | #8 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | #8 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | #5 14 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | #3 1 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | #3 4 reviews |
Choosing between Crave Interactive and Hoteza Tablet hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, technological expectations, and budget. Both solutions aim to elevate guest experiences with in-room tablets, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Crave leads with a larger user base, recent high-quality reviews, and a broader feature set, making it the more proven choice for most hoteliers.
Your team must decide whether you prioritize extensive integrations, ease of updates, and a proven track record—factors where Crave excels—or if you prefer a more customizable, revenue-oriented platform like Hoteza. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Crave Interactive offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a high HTR Score of ~93, a 4.6/5 overall rating, and over 147 reviews, most recent within the last six months. Its strengths lie in extensive in-room functionalities like multi-language support, payments, room service ordering, and digital menus. Conversely, Hoteza’s tablet, with only 21 reviews and no recent feedback, has a lower overall rating and a less proven track record, making its market presence and reliability less assured.
Crave’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive UI, quick support, and reliable hardware, whereas Hoteza’s latest feedback points to slower responses and some technological issues. Do you want a solution backed by recent, consistent user feedback or a less tested platform?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich solution with proven support and a large user base, go with Crave. Its extensive list of unique features like QR codes, contactless ordering, and POS integrations makes it ideal for hotels aiming to modernize guest engagement and operational efficiency.
If your hotel prioritizes fully customizable branding, advanced analytics, and a focus on in-room revenue generation, Hoteza might appeal. However, its limited recent reviews and reported technological reliability issues suggest it’s less suited for hotels seeking a stable, high-performance platform.
Crave’s UI has a 4.5/5 rating, and users consistently praise its intuitive design and ease of onboarding, supported by highly responsive customer service rated at 4.6/5. Its onboarding process is rated 4.37/5, and reviews mention a user-friendly interface that guests find easy to navigate, enhancing their overall experience.
Hoteza’s interface scores slightly lower at 4.43/5, with reviews indicating that although it’s generally user-friendly, some users experience delays in response and configuration. The recent feedback suggests Hoteza’s support could be improved for smoother implementation and troubleshooting.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave offers 27 features exclusive to its platform, including hotel directory, multi-lingual support, payments, guest messaging, web-app, QR codes, and in-venue ordering, making it highly versatile. Hoteza’s platform, on the other hand, shares 28 features but lacks any unique functionalities beyond the core offerings.
Crave’s additional features enable more in-depth guest engagement and operational automation, giving it a clear edge for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution. Its wide array of functionalities supports both guest satisfaction and revenue growth.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support is rated 4.6/5, with reviews praising quick, attentive responses and effective problem-solving. Hoteliers report that Crave’s support team is proactive during onboarding and ongoing operations, often resolving issues within hours.
Hoteza’s support is rated slightly lower at 4.38/5, with some reviews citing delayed responses and slow issue resolution, especially concerning configuration changes and reliability. While generally supportive, Hoteza’s support appears less consistent.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including notable names like Oracle Hospitality, Amadeus, and Infor. Hoteza boasts 20 verified integrations, including Stripe, Mews, and Shiji Group, with some overlaps but also unique partners focused on hotel management and payment systems.
Both platforms offer extensive integrations, but Crave’s long-standing presence and broader industry connections provide a slight advantage. If integration breadth is a priority, Hoteza’s higher partner count may interest you, but Crave’s established ecosystem is more mature.
Edge: Hoteza.
Crave’s recent reviews, with over 147 total, consistently rate the platform at 4.6/5, with many hotels praising its reliability, ease of use, and support. The latest reviews reinforce Crave’s reputation, making it the preferred choice among hoteliers.
Hoteza’s reviews, limited to 21 and no recent feedback, do not provide a clear consensus. The few reviews available indicate satisfaction but also highlight concerns over delays and technological issues, making it less reliable for high-demand environments.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave charges a base price of $1,200 with no mention of monthly fees or implementation costs, suggesting a straightforward licensing fee. Hoteza’s base price is $800, also without ongoing fees, but with less clarity on additional costs like updates or support.
While Crave’s higher initial fee reflects its broader feature set and proven support, Hoteza’s lower price may appeal for smaller or budget-conscious hotels, but potential hidden costs or less support could offset savings.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or primarily needs simple in-room entertainment without advanced functionalities.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a stable, proven platform with extensive recent reviews or quick, responsive support.
Crave is a well-established, feature-packed platform with a broad global footprint, excellent recent reviews, and high user ratings. Its strengths include extensive functionalities, robust support, and a proven track record, making it suitable for hotels seeking reliability and operational automation.
Hoteza offers a flexible, customizable platform with a focus on revenue generation and branding. However, its limited recent reviews, occasional support delays, and reported technological issues mean it’s less suited for hotels that require stability and proven performance.
Choose Crave if you want a trusted, feature-rich solution backed by current positive feedback. Opt for Hoteza only if your hotel can manage potential risks and values custom branding and analytics above proven reliability.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Hoteza Tablet share 28 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Hoteza Tablet share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while Hoteza Tablet offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Interactive (Tablets) leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. Hoteza Tablet: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and Hoteza has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor