The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 194 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Incentient shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 194 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 0 |
After analyzing 194 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while Incentient users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Incentient
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Incentient
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Incentient
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Incentient
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Interactive and Incentient for your hotel’s in-room tablets hinges on several factors. Both aim to elevate the guest experience, streamline operations, and boost revenue, but their approaches and proven results differ significantly. Crave excels in user-friendliness, extensive features, and established market presence, while Incentient offers bespoke solutions tailored mainly to luxury venues with a focus on advertising and personalization. Which aligns better with your hotel's goals?
Crave Interactive dominates in review count and recent feedback, with 147 reviews in the last six months and a stellar 4.6/5 overall rating, backed by a 92.76 HTR Score. Incentient, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making its market confidence less clear. Crave's robust support and ease of use are reflected in its 4.5/5 UI rating and 4.6/5 customer support score, whereas Incentient’s user experience remains unverified.
Both solutions serve in-room guest engagement, but Crave’s broad feature set (55 exclusive features) supports a wide range of hotel types. Incentient, with no listed features or integrations, appears more niche and less proven at scale. Given the proven track record and recent feedback, which product aligns more with your hotel’s need for reliability and experience?
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich, easy-to-implement tablet solution with extensive partner integrations, go with Crave. Its proven effectiveness across luxury, resort, and boutique hotels—supported by the highest review count and recent positive feedback—makes it the safer choice.
If your hotel prioritizes a highly customizable, luxury-focused platform emphasizing advertising and bespoke guest experiences without immediate concern for broad feature sets or recent reviews, Incentient could be suitable. However, the lack of recent data and reviews diminishes confidence.
For most mid-to-large hotels seeking a tested, comprehensive solution, Crave’s extensive track record and continuous improvements make it the clear winner.
Crave’s UI scores 4.5/5, and users consistently praise its intuitive, modern interface that simplifies guest interactions. The onboarding process averages 4.37/5, with hotel staff finding it straightforward to implement, and support responsiveness at 4.6/5. Review comments highlight that guests can easily navigate the tablets, and staff find updates manageable despite some content update challenges.
Incentient offers no publicly available ratings or recent reviews that evaluate ease of use. Its bespoke nature suggests a high level of customization, but this can often translate to a steeper learning curve. Without concrete data, Crave’s clearly documented usability edge is the safer bet.
Edge: Crave Interactive
Crave provides 55 exclusive features, including digital directories, multi-lingual support, room controls, contactless ordering, payment integrations, upselling, guest messaging, and more. These features support diverse guest needs and operational efficiencies, giving your team multiple avenues to enhance service and revenue.
Incentient’s platform lacks publicly listed features or integrations, making it impossible to compare feature sets directly. Its focus appears more on bespoke advertising and high-end personalization rather than a broad suite of operational tools.
Crave’s extensive feature list makes it the more versatile and complete solution for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest engagement platform.
Edge: Crave Interactive
Crave’s user reviews consistently praise its customer support, rating it at 4.6/5. Clients commend their responsiveness, proactive assistance, and smooth onboarding process, with comments like, “Crave’s support team is highly responsive and ensures a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.”
Incentient, lacking recent reviews or ratings, offers no verified data on support quality. Its bespoke nature suggests dedicated account management, but without feedback, it’s impossible to gauge responsiveness or service quality.
Given the data, Crave’s well-documented support performance gives it a decisive advantage.
Edge: Crave Interactive
Crave’s current reviews are recent, with 147 reviews in the last six months and a high rating of 4.6/5, including a 90% likelihood to recommend. Its property segment ratings also reflect strong satisfaction, especially among independent and boutique hotels.
Incentient has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its customer satisfaction unverified. This absence makes it impossible to assess how hoteliers perceive its value or effectiveness.
For dependable, recent feedback, Crave’s high scores confirm it is the hotter-rated product.
Edge: Crave Interactive
Crave’s pricing is transparent, with a base price of $1,200 and no additional implementation or subscription fees. Its model is straightforward, making budgeting easier.
Incentient’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates comparison. Its bespoke nature likely means customized quotes, often associated with higher costs without fixed pricing transparency.
Given the transparency and clear value from Crave, it provides better budget predictability.
Crave’s core strength lies in its extensive, proven feature set, broad market presence, and high hotel satisfaction scores backed by recent reviews. Its solutions are designed for hotels seeking reliable, easy-to-deploy guest engagement tools that generate measurable operational benefits.
Incentient offers a highly customized, luxury-focused platform emphasizing advertising and tailored guest experiences. However, the lack of recent reviews and publicly available feature details makes it a riskier choice for most hotels.
For most hotel operators, especially those valuing proven performance and comprehensive capabilities, Crave Interactive is the clear choice. Incentient might suit niche, high-end venues with the resources and desire to develop a bespoke experience, but it does not yet demonstrate the reliability and scale of Crave.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Incentient
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Incentient (Tablets) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Incentient
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Digital directory | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 43 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
Incentient
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Incentient (Tablets) share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while Incentient (Tablets) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Interactive (Tablets) leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. Incentient (Tablets): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and Incentient has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor