The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 244 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Eleanor shines in guest bookings and reservations — especially for city-center properties (5.0/5), with exclusive features like Hotel branded confirmations & recommendations.
Flexkeeping shines in ease of use — especially for bed & breakfast properties (5.0/5), with exclusive features like Wake up calls and Package Management & Tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 244 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 218 | 26 |
After analyzing 244 verified reviews, Eleanor users most value its guest bookings and reservations, operations and department coordination, guest itinerary and preference management, while Flexkeeping users highlight ease of use, guest recommendations. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest bookings and reservations
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
Operations and department coordination
▾
|
+
Guest Recommendations
▾
|
|
+
Guest itinerary and preference management
▾
|
|
|
+
Mobile access and usability
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Speed, loading, and system performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Concierge Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 22 reviews | #4 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 99 reviews | #3 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 51 reviews | #4 6 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 17 reviews | #3 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 83 reviews | #3 11 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 133 reviews | #4 10 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 14 reviews | #3 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 5 reviews | #2 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #5 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #6 2 reviews | #2 21 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #1 160 reviews | #4 0 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 5 reviews | — |
Eleanor and Flexkeeping both serve the concierge software category but target different operational needs and hotel types. Eleanor excels in resort and activity-centric environments by integrating guest bookings, upselling, and communication into one system, appealing to resorts and luxury properties focused on guest experience and ancillary revenue. Flexkeeping prioritizes task management, departmental communication, and operational automation, catering to hotels seeking streamlined housekeeping, maintenance, and cross-department collaboration.
Both platforms solve the challenge of fragmented hotel operations that rely on multiple apps, spreadsheets, and manual processes. They improve staff communication and guest service delivery but differ in scope: Eleanor emphasizes guest-facing activity bookings and upselling, while Flexkeeping centers on internal task automation and interdepartmental workflows.
If your property is a resort or luxury hotel where managing guest activities, excursions, and upselling is critical, Eleanor is the better choice. It has a user base with 60% resorts and 15% luxury hotels, supported by 198 reviews averaging 4.8/5 overall, including 11 recent reviews maintaining the same rating. Eleanor’s features like hotel-branded confirmations and recommendations streamline guest engagement and revenue growth.
If you operate a city center hotel, branded hotel, or extended stay property with a strong need for operational task management and departmental collaboration, Flexkeeping fits better. Its users include 25% resorts, 15% city center hotels, and 12% branded hotels, with a smaller but perfect overall rating of 5/5 from 26 reviews. Flexkeeping’s features like wake-up calls and package management support daily operational efficiency and maintenance workflows.
Data on boutique and hostel segments is limited for Flexkeeping (few reviews), so conclusions there are less robust. Eleanor’s larger and more diverse review base provides stronger evidence of fit for resorts and luxury hotels, while Flexkeeping’s case studies demonstrate ROI and productivity gains in mid-size to large hotels emphasizing operations.
Eleanor has an ease of use rating of 4.8/5 across 198 reviews, with onboarding rated 4.8/5. Flexkeeping scores 5/5 on ease of use and 4.8/5 on onboarding but from only 26 total reviews. Reviewers for Eleanor often highlight its intuitive mobile interface, which helps staff perform tasks on the go in large resort properties. Flexkeeping users emphasize its simplicity and the ability for new users to learn the system within minutes, praising the user experience as a primary goal.
Staff adoption is supported by both platforms through straightforward interfaces, but Eleanor’s larger review volume provides more confidence in consistent ease of use across diverse hotel types. Flexkeeping’s perfect ease of use rating is less certain given the smaller sample.
Edge: Even.
Eleanor and Flexkeeping share four common features typical of concierge software, but Eleanor offers one unique feature: hotel-branded confirmations and recommendations. This feature enhances guest engagement by sending personalized confirmations and promoting hotel services, impacting guest experience teams and front desk workflows by automating communication and upselling.
Flexkeeping provides two unique features: wake-up calls and package management & tracking. Wake-up calls automate guest reminders, reducing front desk phone time, while package management helps track deliveries for guests, critical for urban and extended stay hotels managing multiple parcels and guest requests.
Eleanor’s unique feature supports guest-facing personalization and revenue generation, while Flexkeeping focuses on operational task management features that reduce manual workload. Eleanor’s feature suite aligns with guest experience enhancement; Flexkeeping’s suits internal efficiency.
Edge: Even.
Eleanor and Flexkeeping both have a customer support rating of 4.9/5 with onboarding at 4.8/5. Eleanor’s 198 reviews include praise for responsive, clear assistance and ongoing support, though some users request improved tech support availability and multilingual support. Flexkeeping’s 26 reviews consistently commend their support and responsiveness, highlighting smooth implementation and willingness to accept feature requests.
Both platforms maintain high satisfaction with support, indicating dedicated teams aiding adoption and troubleshooting. Eleanor’s broader review volume offers more documented evidence of support quality, while Flexkeeping’s smaller base also reflects positive experiences.
Edge: Even.
Eleanor integrates with 4 verified partners, including Maestro PMS, Yanolja Cloud Solution, hconnect, and Oracle Hospitality. Flexkeeping connects with 24 verified partners, sharing Oracle Hospitality but also integrating with RoomRaccoon, apaleo GmbH, Benbria, Guesty, RoomKey PMS, RMS, Shiji Group, Mews, and roommaster.
Flexkeeping’s broader integration ecosystem benefits hotels using diverse PMS and operational systems, particularly mid-size and large hotels requiring multiple software connections. Eleanor’s limited integrations may constrain properties needing extensive system interoperability but remain sufficient for many resorts focused on specific PMS platforms.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Eleanor holds a 4.8/5 overall rating from 198 reviews, with 11 reviews in the last six months maintaining 4.8/5. Flexkeeping has a perfect 5/5 rating from 26 reviews but only 1 recent review, which is insufficient to validate current performance. Both have high likelihoods to recommend: Eleanor at 97% and Flexkeeping at 99%.
Segment ratings show Eleanor excelling in resorts (4.9/5 across 193 reviews), luxury hotels (4.8/5, 146 reviews), and boutique hotels (4.9/5, 94 reviews). Flexkeeping scores 5/5 in branded hotels (8 reviews), bed & breakfasts (7 reviews), and airport/conference hotels (9 reviews), with slightly lower but still strong 4.9/5 in resorts (8 reviews) and luxury hotels (11 reviews).
Eleanor’s large and consistent review base provides more reliable ratings, especially in resorts and luxury hotels. Flexkeeping’s small sample size and fewer recent reviews limit confidence despite perfect scores.
Edge: Even.
Eleanor has a base price of $700 with a 30-day trial and no implementation fee. Flexkeeping’s base price is $400, without a trial or implementation fee. Neither offers freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing.
Eleanor’s higher base price reflects its specialized resort-centric features and support. Flexkeeping’s lower starting price may appeal to hotels prioritizing operational automation within tighter budgets. Trial availability favors Eleanor for properties seeking risk-free evaluation.
Not ideal if…
Not ideal if…
Eleanor and Flexkeeping both address hotel operations but diverge in focus: Eleanor integrates guest bookings, upselling, and communication for resorts and luxury hotels, while Flexkeeping automates task management and departmental collaboration for a broader hotel range. Eleanor’s system streamlines guest-facing activities and personalized service, freeing front desk staff to enhance guest interactions. Flexkeeping excels in automating operational workflows, reducing administrative burden, and unifying hotel departments.
Choose Eleanor if your property is a resort or luxury hotel that depends on activity bookings, guest engagement, and upselling opportunities. Eleanor’s branded confirmations, real-time communication, and mobile access deliver operational efficiency and revenue growth tailored to large guest experiences. Its proven integration with Maestro PMS and Yanolja aligns with specialized resort environments.
Choose Flexkeeping if your hotel requires broad operational automation, task management, and interdepartmental communication across housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk. Its unique features like wake-up calls and package tracking, combined with an extensive integration network and documented ROI of up to 570%, make it ideal for mid-size to large branded or city center hotels focused on operational productivity.
The review volume and current ratings support Eleanor’s leadership in resorts and luxury segments, while Flexkeeping’s smaller but perfect rating and integration depth favor operationally complex properties. Both platforms earn high marks on usability and support, leaving the choice to the operational priorities and guest interaction models of your property.
Concierge Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $400/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Branding & Customization
|
|
|
| Hotel branded confirmations & recommendations | ||
|
▾
Logistics & Fulfillment
|
|
|
| Package Management & Tracking | ||
| Transportation | ||
| Lost & Found | ||
| Wake up calls | ||
| Reservations | ||
| Request Management | ||
|
▾
Vendor Management
|
|
|
| Smart Vendor Database | ||
| Transportation | ||
| Reservations | ||
|
▾
Guest Communication
|
|
|
| Request Management |
We analyzed 10 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"The results have been very impressive, and we now have a system which is being used as intended and providing real actionable data for us."
"Flexkeeping completely transformed our workflow which led to an 80% reduction in the workload, simplifying processes and massively lowering our stress levels!"
"As one of the largest resorts in Sharm El Sheikh, we faced an uphill challenge in making sure that our guests were aware of our product and offering. The Domina Coral Bay guest mob..."
"Every comment a guest makes gets immediately communicated throughout the whole hotel. Since it’s such a transparent platform, staff can react instantly, and management can stay inf..."
What hoteliers love
Users most often mention Eleanor for making it easy to book, manage, and track guest reservations across activities, dining, spa, and excursions. Hote... Users most often mention Eleanor for making it easy to book, manage, and track guest reservations across activities, dining, spa, and excursions. Hotels say it reduces waiting time, prevents missed bookings, and supports smoother front-of-house operations and guest self-service.
Users frequently describe Eleanor as a central operating hub that connects departments and streamlines daily hotel or resort workflows. It helps teams... Users frequently describe Eleanor as a central operating hub that connects departments and streamlines daily hotel or resort workflows. It helps teams coordinate requests, reduce manual handoffs, and keep operations organized across concierge, reservations, and back-of-house functions.
Many reviews highlight Eleanor’s ability to centralize guest itineraries, preferences, bills, and activity history so staff can personalize service. H... Many reviews highlight Eleanor’s ability to centralize guest itineraries, preferences, bills, and activity history so staff can personalize service. Hotels use this visibility to recognize guests on arrival, tailor recommendations, and coordinate a more seamless stay.
Where hoteliers push back
A recurring concern is that Eleanor can slow down during use, with some users mentioning delayed loading, slower report generation, and responsiveness... A recurring concern is that Eleanor can slow down during use, with some users mentioning delayed loading, slower report generation, and responsiveness issues on larger datasets. While the product is generally described as reliable, performance improvements are a common request.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently commend the app for its simplicity and straightforward nature. The ease of use makes it an attractive tool for managing guest service... Users frequently commend the app for its simplicity and straightforward nature. The ease of use makes it an attractive tool for managing guest services and requests efficiently, which can directly enhance operational workflow and guest satisfaction.
Users have expressed willingness to recommend the app to others, indicating high satisfaction levels. This aspect could significantly boost revenue fo... Users have expressed willingness to recommend the app to others, indicating high satisfaction levels. This aspect could significantly boost revenue for hotels by leveraging positive guest experiences to attract new customers.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Eleanor and Flexkeeping - Automation Suite share many core Concierge Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Eleanor offers 4 verified integration partners, while Flexkeeping - Automation Suite offers 24. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Flexkeeping - Automation Suite leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Eleanor: No. Flexkeeping - Automation Suite: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Concierge Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Eleanor has an HT Score of 96 and Flexkeeping has 84. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property