The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 177 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Goki shines in keyless entry — especially for casino properties (5.0/5), with exclusive features like Guest Management Dashboard and Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 177 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 174 | 3 |
After analyzing 177 verified reviews, Goki users most value its keyless entry, remote access management, guest communication, while Onity users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Keyless Entry
▾
|
|
|
+
Remote Access Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Activities
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Connectivity Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Support Response Time
▾
|
|
|
−
Signal Strength
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Keyless Entry Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 85 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 58 reviews | #17 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 13 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 11 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 50 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #3 31 reviews | #17 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 17 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 21 reviews | #14 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 20 reviews | #17 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #1 45 reviews | #14 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #4 1 reviews | — |
Goki and Onity both address the critical need for hotel keyless entry systems, but they diverge sharply in how they fit different hotel profiles. Goki excels in providing a modern, cloud-based keyless entry system with extensive features tailored for small to medium-sized properties, especially hostels and boutique hotels, supported by 174 reviews with a strong 4.8/5 overall rating. Onity, with its 80-year legacy and 5/5 rating from just 3 reviews, targets established luxury hotels with a global footprint, emphasizing traditional electronic locks alongside mobile credentials.
Both systems solve the fundamental problem of replacing physical keys with digital access to improve guest convenience and operational security. Goki focuses on seamless integrations, mobile apps, and remote management, while Onity offers a broad hardware portfolio and a mature global service network, including electronic safes and energy management.
If you manage a hostel, boutique, or small independent hotel, especially in regions like Australia, Europe, or North America where Goki operates strongly, choose Goki based on its 174 reviews indicating ease of use (4.8/5) and excellent integration with PMSs such as Mews and RMS. Goki’s cloud-based access management and mobile app deliver operational efficiency and guest satisfaction for small to mid-sized properties.
If your property is a luxury or branded hotel looking for a vendor with a vast global installation base and comprehensive hardware solutions, Onity may fit better despite limited recent review data. Onity’s 5/5 rating comes from only 3 reviews without recent activity, so this choice depends on your trust in their long-standing industry presence rather than current user feedback.
The data is thin for properties outside these profiles, and Onity’s lack of recent reviews limits confidence in its current product state. Goki’s significant drop in review activity (from an average of 13.3 reviews per 6 months to zero in the last 6 months) also suggests caution, as its past performance may not reflect recent changes.
Goki scores 4.8/5 for ease of use and 4.6/5 for onboarding from 174 reviews, with users praising its intuitive mobile app and quick code generation for guests. Reviewers highlight smooth late check-ins and remote management capabilities that reduce front-desk workload. Some mention installation complexity, but operationally the system simplifies guest access workflows.
Onity’s ease of use and onboarding ratings are 2.3/5 and 2/5 respectively, based on just 3 reviews, which note a simple interface but criticize the need for frequent updates and long reboot times after malfunctions, impacting day-to-day usability.
Due to the larger and more representative dataset for Goki and its high user satisfaction, the evidence supports Goki as easier to use, though the rating edges fall within the threshold for calling the ease-of-use comparison "Even" because Onity’s limited reviews show some ease benefits.
Edge: Even.
Goki offers 12 unique features not found in Onity, including a Guest Management Dashboard, multi-property management, remote check-in, mobile and Apple Watch apps, developer SDK, and both cloud- and server-based access management solutions. These features facilitate operational flexibility, allowing staff to remotely update guest codes, manage multiple properties from one interface, and integrate access control deeply into hotel workflows.
Onity does not list any unique features beyond the baseline keyless entry and electronic lock hardware. Its strength lies in its extensive hardware portfolio and DirectKey mobile credential platform but lacks the comprehensive software features Goki provides.
Operationally, Goki’s features reduce front desk workload through automation and remote management, enhance guest communication via notifications, and support integrations to promote ancillary revenue, advantages not matched by Onity’s more hardware-centric offering.
Edge: Goki.
Goki’s customer support rating stands at 4.7/5 from 174 reviews, with frequent praise for fast, accurate responses and dedicated after-sales service. Users report helpful tech support and effective problem resolution, although some note regional support gaps.
Onity’s support rating is 2.3/5 from 3 reviews, including complaints about poor communication among departments, inaccessible phone numbers, and unresolved technical problems affecting dozens of rooms. Reviewers describe ongoing issues without effective recourse, which negatively impacts hotel operations.
Although the volume gap limits direct comparison, Goki’s extensive positive feedback on support contrasts with Onity’s reported struggles.
Edge: Even.
Onity boasts 77 verified integrations versus Goki’s 22, sharing 9 common partners including WebRezPro, Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Shiji Group. Onity’s broader integration network includes RoomRaccoon, INTEREL, and Zaplox, useful for hotels requiring extensive legacy system connectivity or third-party energy and minibar management.
Goki’s integrations focus on cloud-based PMS platforms like Cloudbeds, RMS, and Preno, aligning with properties adopting modern, cloud-native technology stacks. These integrations enable automated guest messaging, remote lock management, and enhanced operational workflows.
Hotels prioritizing broad legacy system compatibility may favor Onity’s extensive integrations. Properties seeking streamlined cloud integration and developer flexibility will prefer Goki’s focused but modern ecosystem.
Edge: Onity.
Goki holds a 4.8/5 overall rating from 174 reviews, including 116 from hostels and 114 from limited service hotels, reflecting consistent satisfaction across budget and boutique segments. Ratings by segment include 4.7/5 for city center hotels (47 reviews) and 4.9/5 for extended stay properties (21 reviews).
Onity has a perfect 5/5 rating but only from 3 reviews, insufficient for reliable judgment. Those reviews come from luxury or undefined hotel segments, with no recent review activity to validate current performance.
Goki’s rating is more representative and stable; however, its last six months saw zero reviews versus an average of 13.3 per 6 months previously, indicating a sharp drop in review activity. This decline clouds the current relevance of the rating.
Edge: Even.
Goki prices its base unit at $400 with no implementation fee, monthly or per-room charges, and no freemium or trial options. This straightforward, capital-expenditure model favors hotels wanting predictable upfront costs without ongoing per-room fees.
Onity does not publish pricing data on Hotel Tech Report. The lack of transparency requires direct vendor engagement to determine total cost of ownership, which reviewers note includes a high initial investment and ongoing update expenses.
Without comparable published pricing, Goki’s transparent $400 base price offers a clear purchasing advantage.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Goki and Onity serve distinct segments within hotel keyless entry systems. Goki offers a software-rich, cloud-based solution tailored for small to medium-sized properties that prioritize remote management, guest communication, and integration with modern PMS platforms. Onity provides a hardware-focused, legacy-compatible system with broad global reach and additional facility control products like safes and energy management.
Choose Goki if your hotel values a user-friendly interface (4.8/5 ease of use), extensive cloud features, and integration with PMSs like Mews, supported by 174 detailed reviews, especially for hostels and boutique hotels. Its transparent pricing at $400 per base unit suits properties wanting predictable upfront costs.
Choose Onity if you operate a luxury or branded hotel needing comprehensive hardware solutions and a wide array of integrations (77 partners), and if you rely on a vendor with decades of global experience. However, the limited and older review data and reported customer service issues suggest due diligence before commitment.
Note that Goki's review volume has dropped from 13.3 reviews per 6 months to zero recently, so its high historical ratings may not reflect current performance. Onity’s lack of recent reviews and critical feedback on support warrant caution. Your choice should consider operational priorities, property size, and regional support availability.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Door Hardware
|
|
|
| Door Hardware and Locks | ||
| Door Lock Upgrade Kit | ||
|
▾
Access Management
|
|
|
| Access Management (Cloud Based) | ||
| Access Management Solution (Server Based) | ||
| Guest Management Dashboard | ||
| Google Wallet Integration | ||
| Multi-Property Management | ||
| Notifications | ||
|
▾
Guest App
|
|
|
| Mobile App | ||
| Whitelabel Capability | ||
| Remote Checkin | ||
| Keyless Entry | ||
| Apple Watch App | ||
|
▾
Compatibility
|
|
|
| Door Lock Upgrade Kit | ||
| Apple Watch App | ||
| Developer SDK | ||
| Google Wallet Integration |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Goki's keyless entry system is praised for providing a seamless experience and improving security by abolishing the need for physical keys. Guests app... Goki's keyless entry system is praised for providing a seamless experience and improving security by abolishing the need for physical keys. Guests appreciate the convenience, and hoteliers highlight its contribution to smoother check-ins and enhanced operational efficiency.
Reviewers discussed the value of managing room access remotely, allowing for flexibility in guest arrivals and reducing the workload at the front desk... Reviewers discussed the value of managing room access remotely, allowing for flexibility in guest arrivals and reducing the workload at the front desk, particularly beneficial for properties with limited staff or no 24-hour operation.
The integrated messaging feature allows hotels to communicate efficiently with guests, enhancing the guest experience by addressing concerns or prefer... The integrated messaging feature allows hotels to communicate efficiently with guests, enhancing the guest experience by addressing concerns or preferences quickly. It has been particularly praised for transparency in informing guests about events or issues.
Where hoteliers push back
A few reviewers mentioned connectivity issues with Goki's system, such as problems when the internet goes down. These interruptions can affect the sys... A few reviewers mentioned connectivity issues with Goki's system, such as problems when the internet goes down. These interruptions can affect the system's efficacy, suggesting room for improvement in offline capabilities.
While Goki's support team is generally responsive, some users noted delays in communication, particularly those based in areas with significant time z... While Goki's support team is generally responsive, some users noted delays in communication, particularly those based in areas with significant time zone differences from Goki's support team.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Goki and Onity share many core Hotel Keyless Entry Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Goki offers 22 verified integration partners, while Onity offers 77. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Goki leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 2.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Goki: No. Onity: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Keyless Entry Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Goki has an HT Score of 98 and Onity has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property