The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 370 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GRAND shines , with exclusive features like Guest CRM.
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 370 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 370 |
After analyzing 370 verified reviews, GRAND users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. GRAND PMS promises a unified, intelligent platform with automation and event management, while Stayntouch offers extensive integrations, multi-property management, and a broader feature set. Which system genuinely addresses your hotel’s unique challenges?
GRAND PMS is a newer, cloud-based platform that unifies hotel and venue operations, emphasizing automation and AI-driven tools. Stayntouch, with over 300 reviews and recent positive feedback, stands out with its ease of use, deep integrations, and strong multi-property capabilities. While GRAND's interface is designed to simplify daily tasks, its market presence and review count are limited, making it harder to gauge long-term reliability. Do you prioritize proven solutions or emerging tech?
If your hotel needs a well-established, highly-rated PMS with extensive third-party integrations and a focus on multi-property management, go with Stayntouch. If your team seeks an innovative, AI-powered platform with built-in event management and a more modern interface, GRAND might appeal more. Stayntouch's large, recent review base confirms its market leadership, whereas GRAND’s limited review data suggests caution for risk-averse hoteliers. Consider your growth trajectory and integration requirements.
Stayntouch boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating with 317 reviews, praised for its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and friendly support. Reviewers highlight its mobile-friendly screens, fast setup, and straightforward reservation management. GRAND's interface scores 0/5, with no recent reviews, and its usability remains untested at scale. Based on current data, Stayntouch clearly wins for staff adoption and daily operations. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 37 features exclusive to its platform—covering revenue management, online check-in, contactless solutions, group management, and real-time reporting—making it a feature-rich system. GRAND provides only 2 unique features: guest CRM and automated reminders, with 12 shared features. The stark difference signals Stayntouch's comprehensive approach. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch's customer support scores 4.68/5, backed by 26 recent reviews praising quick, helpful assistance, and smooth onboarding. Users mention their support team as friendly, proactive, and responsive. GRAND's support ratings are unavailable, and with no reviews in recent months, confidence in support quality is low. Based on available data, Stayntouch's support is clearly superior. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including major vendors like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and others, supporting extensive third-party connections. GRAND has no verified integrations, limiting its ecosystem and flexibility. If integrations are critical for your tech stack, Stayntouch’s open API environment makes it the better choice. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch's 4.56/5 overall rating from 317 reviews and a 94% likelihood to recommend reflect strong user satisfaction, especially in boutique, branded, and independent hotels. GRAND’s review count is zero, making any assessment impossible, but its score of 0/5 indicates no public endorsement. For proven satisfaction, Stayntouch wins decisively. Edge: Stayntouch.
GRAND's base price is $900/month, with no free tier, trial, or flexible payment options confirmed. Stayntouch’s base price is $800/month, also without a trial or freemium model. Pricing differences are minimal, but actual costs may vary based on your property size and needs. Confirm with vendors for tailored quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Stayntouch offers a proven, feature-rich, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations, while GRAND is a newer, automation-focused system with limited reviews and integrations. If operational reliability and extensive third-party support matter most, Stayntouch is the clear choice.
Choose GRAND if your hotel is looking for cutting-edge AI tools and event management, and you’re comfortable adopting a less established platform. Its modern interface and automation capabilities are appealing, but market validation remains limited.
For hotels prioritizing stability, integration, and user satisfaction, Stayntouch’s larger, recent review base and proven track record make it the recommended option. It consistently delivers ease of use, robust features, and reliable support, making it suitable for most properties aiming to improve efficiency and guest experience.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, GRAND PMS and Stayntouch share 12 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. GRAND PMS and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. GRAND PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
GRAND PMS: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GRAND has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor