The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 195 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
hub OS shines when it comes to inter-department communication .
Guestnet shines when it comes to user-friendly interface , with exclusive features like Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
Side-by-side ratings based on 195 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 165 |
After analyzing 195 verified reviews, hub OS users most value its inter-department communication, maintenance management, user interface (ui), while Guestnet users highlight user-friendly interface, seamless information dissemination, positive guest experience. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Inter-department Communication
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
Maintenance Management
▾
|
+
Seamless Information Dissemination
▾
|
|
+
User Interface (UI)
▾
|
+
Positive Guest Experience
▾
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Glitches
▾
|
−
Technical Issues and Performance
▾
|
|
−
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
−
Integration with External Systems
▾
|
|
−
Push Notifications and Alerts
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #14 1 reviews | #2 56 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 19 reviews | #2 85 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 7 reviews | #17 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #10 2 reviews | #23 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 17 reviews | #3 52 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 13 reviews | #3 66 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 14 reviews | #7 18 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 3 reviews | #3 14 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #16 2 reviews | #13 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #6 21 reviews | #2 158 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #15 0 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
| Middle East | #6 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Hub OS Guest in Touch and Guestnet hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to improve guest communication, but they serve different purposes: Hub OS focuses on contactless service requests and internal communication, while Guestnet emphasizes digital guest engagement and upselling. With a closer look at recent reviews and performance, you can determine which platform aligns better with your hotel’s strategy.
Hub OS offers a more established, highly reviewed platform with a broad feature set, especially valued for its operational efficiency. Guestnet, despite fewer reviews, boasts a strong recent user base and a comprehensive suite of features tailored to enhance guest experience. Are you prioritizing operational improvements or guest engagement? Let's explore each product’s strengths.
Hub OS Guest in Touch and Guestnet address different hotel challenges. Hub OS's core strength lies in streamlining internal communication—fault reporting, maintenance, and departmental coordination—making it ideal if your team struggles with operational silos. Guestnet excels at engaging guests through personalized, multi-channel communication and upselling tools, boosting satisfaction and revenue.
While Hub OS has 27 reviews, all recent, its overall rating of 4.69/5 indicates a high level of satisfaction, particularly for its ease of use (4.87/5). Guestnet, with 152 reviews and a perfect 96.36/100 HTR Score, is favored for its intuitive interface and automation features, despite a lower overall rating of 0/5 due to review discrepancies. Which area is more critical for your hotel—streamlining operations or enriching guest interactions?
If your hotel needs to improve internal operational workflows, especially maintenance, incident management, and inter-department communication, Hub OS is the better choice. Its core modules are designed for efficiency, with users praising real-time fault reporting and quick resolution, aligning perfectly with hotels that want to reduce operational friction.
Conversely, if your goal is to enhance the digital guest experience—offering seamless information access, upselling, and personalized communication—Guestnet is the superior option. Its features like mobile check-in, digital menus, and automation support higher guest satisfaction, particularly in boutique and luxury hotels aiming for high engagement.
For most hotels, the decision boils down to whether operational efficiency or guest engagement has a higher priority. If you need both, consider that Hub OS’s ease of use and strong support system make it a safer investment for operational needs, while Guestnet’s feature set is tailored for guest-facing innovation.
Hub OS scores a 4.87/5 in ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its user-friendly interface and straightforward deployment. Users find it intuitive for staff adoption, with many noting minimal training required to navigate incident reporting and maintenance tracking. However, some review mentions of occasional crashes suggest room for UI stability improvements.
Guestnet also rates highly at 4.74/5, with users praising its modern, clean design and simple interface that facilitates quick onboarding. Its platform is praised for automating guest communication, although some users call for more personalization options to optimize usability further.
Edge: Hub OS has a slight advantage here with more recent reviews emphasizing its ease and stability, especially for operational staff.
Hub OS offers three core features, including its incident management, maintenance tracking, and basic communication tools, focusing on operational workflows. Guestnet, with nine unique features such as hotel directory, guest profiles, local recommendations, mobile check-in/out, and messaging, provides a richer, more comprehensive guest-facing experience.
Guestnet’s feature set is particularly strong in automation, personalization, and multi-channel communication, making it a more versatile guest experience platform. Its digital guest compendium, integrated ordering, and multi-lingual support differentiate it significantly.
Edge: Guestnet’s broader feature count and focus on guest engagement give it the edge in versatility, especially for hotels seeking to elevate guest satisfaction.
Hub OS garners a 4.74/5 rating for customer support, with reviews noting quick response times and proactive problem-solving. Users appreciate the attentive support team, which is crucial when dealing with operational tools that require minimal downtime.
Guestnet scores slightly higher at 4.82/5, with users highlighting its helpful, always-available support and smooth onboarding. Many reviews emphasize the importance of reliable support for seamless digital guest experiences, especially given their platform’s rapid development and integration capabilities.
Edge: Guestnet’s marginal support rating advantage makes it the preferable choice if customer service is a top priority.
Hub OS’s reviews are predominantly recent, with a 4.69/5 rating based on 27 reviews, all within the last six months. Its users, mainly from larger hotels and resorts, praise its operational improvements and user-friendliness.
Guestnet, with a larger review base (152 reviews) and a high NPS score of 9.51/10, has more varied hotel segments, particularly luxury and boutique properties. Despite its lower average rating, recent reviews praise its automation and guest engagement features.
Given the volume and recency, Hub OS’s ratings are more reliable and indicate a high level of hotel satisfaction.
Hub OS does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting a tailored quote based on hotel size and needs. Guestnet’s base price is $500 per month, with no free tier or trial, making it straightforward for budgeting.
If predictable monthly costs are essential, Guestnet’s transparent pricing simplifies decision-making. However, if your hotel prefers customized solutions, Hub OS might offer more flexibility through direct vendor negotiations.
Not ideal if your primary focus is guest engagement or upselling, as Hub OS does not offer extensive guest-facing features.
Not ideal if operational communication and maintenance tracking are your top concerns, as Guestnet focuses more on guest experience.
Hub OS and Guestnet serve distinct hotel needs: operational versus guest experience. Hub OS is a contactless communication tool primarily designed for internal efficiency, while Guestnet delivers a fully customizable digital guest journey platform.
Choose Hub OS if your hotel needs smarter maintenance, incident management, and inter-department communication, especially in larger properties. Opt for Guestnet if your focus is elevating guest satisfaction, automating communication, and increasing revenue through upselling.
Both platforms excel within their niches, but for most hotels, the decision depends on whether operational or guest-centric improvements are more urgent.
Summary:
Hub OS Guest in Touch offers a mature, highly-rated solution for operational management with a focus on internal communication and maintenance. Guestnet, with its extensive features, is better suited for hotels emphasizing guest engagement, automation, and upselling.
When to choose Hub OS:
When to choose Guestnet:
In conclusion, if operational efficiency is your priority, Hub OS Guest in Touch is the safer, more proven choice. If elevating guest experience and increasing sales are your goals, Guestnet is the more comprehensive solution.
According to HTR's product database, Hub OS Guest in Touch and Guestnet share 3 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Guest Profiles | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Payments |
We analyzed 7 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The tools allow us to reduce paper and manual workflows. At the same time, the optimized communication saves time that we can now invest directly in our guests."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Guestnet allows us to provide guests with all important information 24/7, which significantly increases satisfaction. At the same time, the platform reduces our team’s workload thr..."
What hoteliers love
Hub OS excels in facilitating communication across various hotel departments. Reviews highlight the ease of reporting issues and distributing tasks am... Hub OS excels in facilitating communication across various hotel departments. Reviews highlight the ease of reporting issues and distributing tasks among teams, leading to coordinated efforts and improved service delivery. This feature has greatly enhanced the overall operational flow.
Users appreciate Hub OS's ability to streamline maintenance operations. It provides quick reporting and resolution of faults, reducing downtime and op... Users appreciate Hub OS's ability to streamline maintenance operations. It provides quick reporting and resolution of faults, reducing downtime and operational inefficiencies. The software allows teams to track and communicate maintenance issues in real-time, leading to faster problem-solving.
While many users find Hub OS user-friendly and visually appealing, some have experienced issues with the interface, such as occasional crashes or dela... While many users find Hub OS user-friendly and visually appealing, some have experienced issues with the interface, such as occasional crashes or delays. Despite these hiccups, users still appreciate how the software simplifies complex tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
A recurring issue mentioned by users is the presence of technical glitches. These include synchronization delays, occasional crashes, and interface er... A recurring issue mentioned by users is the presence of technical glitches. These include synchronization delays, occasional crashes, and interface errors. While these issues are generally resolved quickly, they can still disrupt hotel operations.
Hub OS's mobile accessibility is commended for allowing hotel staff to manage operations on-the-go. This feature is especially useful for reporting is... Hub OS's mobile accessibility is commended for allowing hotel staff to manage operations on-the-go. This feature is especially useful for reporting issues and accessing important data quickly, thereby saving time and improving overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel s... Customers consistently praise Guestnet for its intuitive and user-friendly design that makes information easily accessible for both guests and hotel staff. This feature is crucial for fast adoption and smooth operation, minimizing training time and error occurrence.
Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations... Reviews highlight that Guestnet effectively allows hotels to provide guests with all needed information, including local activities and accommodations, without the need for paper-based resources, enhancing operational efficiency.
Many reviewers report enhanced guest satisfaction due to quick access to hotel services and amenities through Guestnet, leading to positive feedback a... Many reviewers report enhanced guest satisfaction due to quick access to hotel services and amenities through Guestnet, leading to positive feedback and potentially increased return visits.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, wh... While generally reliable, several users pointed out occasional technical performance issues such as slow loading times when used by multiple users, which could be improved for a better experience.
Reviewers appreciate Guestnet's integrations with local tourism data and hotel management systems, though some mention a desire for further integratio... Reviewers appreciate Guestnet's integrations with local tourism data and hotel management systems, though some mention a desire for further integration to enhance automation and reduce manual tasks.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hub OS Guest in Touch and Guestnet share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Hub OS Guest in Touch offers 23 verified integration partners, while Guestnet offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hub OS Guest in Touch leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hub OS Guest in Touch: No. Guestnet: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. hub OS has an HT Score of 22 and Guestnet has 96. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor