The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 57 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
hub OS shines when it comes to inter-department communication .
GuestSpace shines when it comes to user experience , with exclusive features like Guest Messaging and Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 57 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 27 |
After analyzing 57 verified reviews, hub OS users most value its inter-department communication, maintenance management, user interface (ui), while GuestSpace users highlight user experience, communication features, guest self-service features. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Inter-department Communication
▾
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
+
Maintenance Management
▾
|
+
Communication Features
▾
|
|
+
User Interface (UI)
▾
|
+
Guest Self-Service Features
▾
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
+
Online Check-In Automation
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Glitches
▾
|
−
Integration with Lock and Reservation Systems
▾
|
|
−
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #14 1 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 19 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 7 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #10 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 17 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 13 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 14 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #8 3 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #16 2 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #6 21 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #15 0 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #6 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between Hub OS Guest in Touch and GuestSpace hinges on your hotel’s priorities: operational efficiency and communication versus guest self-service and automation. While both aim to enhance guest experience, they serve different core functions—Hub OS focuses on internal communication and maintenance, whereas GuestSpace emphasizes guest self-management and digital check-in. Your decision should align with whether your team needs better communication tools or a seamless guest self-service platform.
Hub OS Guest in Touch offers a contactless communication system that improves operational flow, but it doesn't include the extensive guest-facing features found in GuestSpace. Conversely, GuestSpace provides a comprehensive digital guest journey, but it may lack the depth of internal communication and maintenance management that Hub OS excels at.
Do you prioritize streamlining internal processes or creating an autonomous guest experience?
Both products address different hotel needs. Hub OS Guest in Touch is ideal if your team struggles with internal communication, maintenance tracking, and operational coordination, especially in larger or multi-department properties. Its primary function is to improve the flow of information internally, reducing delays and miscommunication.
GuestSpace, on the other hand, is designed for hotels seeking to enhance guest self-service, automate check-ins, and increase revenue via upselling tools. With its digital check-in, mobile keys, and guest engagement features, it caters to properties aiming to reduce front desk workload and provide a modern digital experience.
While Hub OS boasts a recent review count of 26, all from the last six months, its lack of current reviews weakens confidence in ongoing support. GuestSpace, with 26 reviews also within the last six months, has the advantage of recent feedback, making its high rating more reliable.
Are you looking to improve internal operations or elevate the guest self-service experience?
If your hotel needs a robust internal communication and maintenance management system, Hub OS is the clear pick. Its user-friendly interface and high overall rating of 4.69/5, supported by recent reviews, indicate its reliability and strong support. It is especially suitable for hotels that require real-time incident tracking, inter-department coordination, and detailed analytics.
If your hotel aims to automate the guest journey, reduce front desk workload, and boost revenue through upselling, GuestSpace is better suited. Its suite of features—digital check-in, mobile keys, and guest messaging—are tailored for properties targeting efficiency and modern guest expectations. Its high review score (though with a lower overall rating of 0/5 in public perception) suggests strong customer satisfaction, particularly in North America and Europe.
In summary, choose Hub OS if operational management and internal communication are pain points. Opt for GuestSpace if the guest experience and self-service automation are your priorities.
Hub OS scores a 4.87/5 for onboarding, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface and ease of training staff. However, some mention occasional crashes and synchronization issues, which can temporarily hinder usability.
GuestSpace also scores highly at 4.6/5 for onboarding, with users highlighting its straightforward web app design and quick setup. While some wish for more customization options, both platforms are generally easy for staff to adopt.
Given the recent reviews and high ratings, Hub OS's ease of use edges out slightly ahead, especially considering its positive feedback on operational integration. Edge: Hub OS Guest in Touch.
Hub OS primarily offers communication and incident management features—its core module allows real-time incident reporting, maintenance tracking, and operational dashboards. It lacks the extensive guest-facing functionalities present in GuestSpace.
GuestSpace provides nine unique features not found in Hub OS, including automatic translations, guest messaging, hotel directory, local recommendations, payments, mobile check-in and checkout, guest profiles, and app downloads. These features directly enhance guest self-service and engagement, making GuestSpace more comprehensive for guest-facing operations.
If your hotel needs in-depth internal communication tools, Hub OS’s feature set is sufficient. However, for a broader guest experience platform with automation and upselling capabilities, GuestSpace's features give it the edge.
Edge: GuestSpace.
Hub OS’s reviews highlight a 4.74/5 support rating, with comments about proactive service and quick resolution of issues. Users mention that the support team is highly involved and supports smooth system operation, which is critical given its occasional technical glitches.
GuestSpace’s support rating is slightly lower at 4.46/5, with reviews praising responsiveness but noting room for faster responses, especially during pre-opening phases. Support quality remains good, but Hub OS’s recent, highly positive feedback makes it the preferred choice for reliable support.
Edge: Hub OS Guest in Touch.
Hub OS boasts 23 verified partners, including prominent systems like Mews, Stayntouch, and Oracle Hospitality. Its extensive integration network facilitates smoother data flow and operational cohesion across various hotel management tools.
GuestSpace, with only 4 verified partners, includes integrations like FLEXIPASS and Goki but lacks the broad connectivity of Hub OS. Shared partners with Hub OS include Mews and Stayntouch, but overall, Hub OS’s ecosystem is more mature and versatile.
For hotels needing multiple system integrations, Hub OS clearly leads. Edge: Hub OS Guest in Touch.
Hub OS has a high overall rating of 4.69/5, with recent reviews affirming its positive impact on daily operations and inter-department communication. Hoteliers in luxury, boutique, and resort segments praise its interface and support quality, with property ratings averaging 4.64/5.
GuestSpace's reviews are less recent, and the platform has a public rating of 0/5, indicating a discrepancy between user satisfaction and publicly visible ratings. In recent months, however, its users report that the platform effectively reduces check-in time and improves guest engagement.
Given the more recent and consistent positive feedback, Hub OS maintains a higher hotel rating. Edge: Hub OS Guest in Touch.
Hub OS does not publicly disclose its pricing, indicating that costs are likely customized based on hotel size and feature needs. It offers no freemium or trial options, suggesting higher entry costs and tailored quotes.
GuestSpace charges a base fee of $600 per month, with no free tier or trial period. The absence of detailed pricing beyond the base fee suggests a straightforward, although potentially costly, investment.
Pricing transparency favors GuestSpace for clarity, but without detailed quotes, it's hard to compare value directly. Overall, expect higher, customized costs with Hub OS.
Hotels that benefit from Hub OS's incident management, maintenance tracking, and operational dashboards include:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that prioritize internal communication, operational oversight, and maintenance efficiency should lean toward Hub OS.
Hotels that should consider GuestSpace include:
Not ideal if:
GuestSpace is suitable for hotels wanting to modernize their guest journey and boost revenue through automation.
Hub OS Guest in Touch excels at internal hotel communication, maintenance management, and operational oversight, making it ideal for larger hotels or properties with complex workflows. Its recent reviews and high overall ratings affirm its reliability and support quality, positioning it as a trusted internal management platform.
GuestSpace offers a robust digital guest journey, combining self-check-in, mobile keys, and upselling tools to streamline guest interactions and increase revenue. While its current ratings are lower and more recent reviews focus on its effectiveness, it’s best suited for properties prioritizing automation and guest autonomy.
Choose Hub OS if your goal is to improve internal communication and operational control. Opt for GuestSpace if your focus is on elevating guest self-service and increasing revenue through digital engagement.
In conclusion, for hotels that need a proven, well-supported system for internal operations, Hub OS is the safer bet. If your hotel aims to deliver a modern, automated guest experience, GuestSpace offers a compelling, feature-rich solution.
Edge: Hub OS Guest in Touch for internal management; GuestSpace for guest-facing automation.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Hub OS Guest in Touch and GuestSpace share 3 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Mobile Checkout | ||
| Payments |
What hoteliers love
Hub OS excels in facilitating communication across various hotel departments. Reviews highlight the ease of reporting issues and distributing tasks am... Hub OS excels in facilitating communication across various hotel departments. Reviews highlight the ease of reporting issues and distributing tasks among teams, leading to coordinated efforts and improved service delivery. This feature has greatly enhanced the overall operational flow.
Users appreciate Hub OS's ability to streamline maintenance operations. It provides quick reporting and resolution of faults, reducing downtime and op... Users appreciate Hub OS's ability to streamline maintenance operations. It provides quick reporting and resolution of faults, reducing downtime and operational inefficiencies. The software allows teams to track and communicate maintenance issues in real-time, leading to faster problem-solving.
While many users find Hub OS user-friendly and visually appealing, some have experienced issues with the interface, such as occasional crashes or dela... While many users find Hub OS user-friendly and visually appealing, some have experienced issues with the interface, such as occasional crashes or delays. Despite these hiccups, users still appreciate how the software simplifies complex tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
A recurring issue mentioned by users is the presence of technical glitches. These include synchronization delays, occasional crashes, and interface er... A recurring issue mentioned by users is the presence of technical glitches. These include synchronization delays, occasional crashes, and interface errors. While these issues are generally resolved quickly, they can still disrupt hotel operations.
Hub OS's mobile accessibility is commended for allowing hotel staff to manage operations on-the-go. This feature is especially useful for reporting is... Hub OS's mobile accessibility is commended for allowing hotel staff to manage operations on-the-go. This feature is especially useful for reporting issues and accessing important data quickly, thereby saving time and improving overall efficiency.
What hoteliers love
The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth a... The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth adoption and effective utilization of its features.
The communication features within DropIn are positively acknowledged; however, some users feel there is room for improvement in outbound communication... The communication features within DropIn are positively acknowledged; however, some users feel there is room for improvement in outbound communication capabilities to enhance guest interaction further.
Guests benefiting from self-service features enjoy more control over their stay, which is facilitated by DropIn, significantly enhancing their experie... Guests benefiting from self-service features enjoy more control over their stay, which is facilitated by DropIn, significantly enhancing their experience. Users align this with increased operational efficiencies as well.
Where hoteliers push back
The integration of DropIn with reservation systems like Mews and its ability to generate digital access codes are highly appreciated. This feature red... The integration of DropIn with reservation systems like Mews and its ability to generate digital access codes are highly appreciated. This feature reduces the need for manual check-ins and enhances the simplicity and security of guest room access.
While generally well-received, several users mentioned a desire for more customization options within the DropIn platform, especially regarding guest... While generally well-received, several users mentioned a desire for more customization options within the DropIn platform, especially regarding guest communications and menu settings. Improvements in this area could further optimize its utility.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hub OS Guest in Touch and GuestSpace share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Hub OS Guest in Touch offers 23 verified integration partners, while GuestSpace offers 4. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hub OS Guest in Touch leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hub OS Guest in Touch: No. GuestSpace: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. hub OS has an HT Score of 22 and GuestSpace has 78. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor