The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
hub OS shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Web-app.
Zaplox shines , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Mobile Checkin.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 4 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, hub OS users most value its inter-department communication, maintenance management, user interface (ui), while Zaplox users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Inter-department Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Maintenance Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface (UI)
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #14 1 reviews | #34 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 19 reviews | #18 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 7 reviews | #26 0 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #10 2 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 17 reviews | #20 2 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 13 reviews | #20 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 14 reviews | #30 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #8 3 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #16 2 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #6 21 reviews | #20 2 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #15 0 reviews | #17 0 reviews |
| Middle East | #6 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between hub OS Guest in Touch and Zaplox Premium Guest App hinges on what your hotel prioritizes—whether operational efficiency or guest experience. Both solutions aim to enhance contactless interactions but diverge significantly in scope, features, and user feedback. How do their strengths align with your hotel’s specific needs?
hub OS offers a web-based communication platform focused on streamlining internal operations and maintenance, while Zaplox provides a fully branded mobile app that puts guest convenience front and center. Are you looking to improve internal workflows or elevate the guest mobile experience?
Both products solve the challenge of contactless communication, but their approaches differ. hub OS emphasizes internal communication, maintenance management, and operational coordination, whereas Zaplox centers on delivering a comprehensive mobile guest journey, including check-in, keyless entry, and service requests.
hub OS’s strength lies in its ability to connect various departments through its web app, making it ideal for hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and incident management. Zaplox excels in creating a seamless, branded mobile experience that reduces front desk interactions and promotes safety—best suited for hotels prioritizing guest contactless engagement.
Are you more focused on internal communication efficiency or guest-facing digital tools?
If your hotel needs to streamline operational workflows, manage maintenance requests, and improve inter-department communication, hub OS is the better choice. Its high ratings—4.69/5 overall, 4.87/5 ease of use, and 97% likelihood to recommend—reflect its strong performance in enhancing hotel operations.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a customizable mobile app to enable contactless check-in, mobile keys, and guest messaging, Zaplox offers a broad suite of features, including mobile payment and concierge services. Its niche focus on guest experience is reflected in its reviews, with an overall rating of 3.33/5 and a 82% recommendation rate, indicating room for growth but solid potential.
For operational hotels that want to optimize internal processes, go with hub OS. For guest-centric properties looking to reduce physical contact and improve mobile engagement, choose Zaplox.
hub OS boasts an impressive ease of use rating 4.87/5, with reviewers calling it user-friendly for all hotel staff and noting the straightforward onboarding process. Reviews highlight its intuitive interface and quick adoption, even across diverse departments, with many praising its mobile accessibility for on-the-go management.
Zaplox, with a 3.33/5 ease of use score, receives mixed feedback. Reviewers mention its mobile app is generally user-friendly but note some issues with integrations, particularly with PMS systems like Opera, which can hinder staff adoption.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS offers 2 core features, including its contactless communication web app, which enables requesting services, reporting incidents, and communicating with staff—all accessible via browser. Zaplox, with 13 features, provides a comprehensive suite: mobile check-in, digital keys, guest messaging, local recommendations, mobile payment, and more.
Zaplox’s extensive feature set surpasses hub OS in scope, offering functionalities that create a full mobile guest journey. hub OS’s unique feature is its web-app contactless communication, but Zaplox’s ability to integrate multiple guest services is a clear advantage.
Edge: Zaplox.
hub OS’s support rating of 4.74/5 is backed by reviews describing quick, proactive, and helpful customer service. Users appreciate the responsiveness and the company’s commitment to resolving issues, which is critical given some reports of technical glitches.
Zaplox’s support scores slightly lower at 4/5, with reviews citing responsive communication but also highlighting occasional delays and integration challenges. Given the more positive feedback on hub OS, it’s the supported choice for hotel teams prioritizing reliable assistance.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS boasts 23 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Infor. Zaplox has 17 verified integrations, including notable partners like SALTO Systems, protel, and dormakaba.
While hub OS’s broader integration network enhances its appeal for complex hotel systems, Zaplox’s fewer but focused integrations still cover essential areas like access control and PMS connectivity. Overall, hub OS edges out with more verified partners.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS enjoys a significantly higher overall rating of 4.69/5 and a recent review count of 27, providing a robust data set. It is favored across hotel segments, with an average segment rating of 4.64/5 and a 97% likelihood to recommend.
Zaplox has only 3 recent reviews and an overall rating of 3.33/5, with mixed feedback mainly from boutique and city center hotels. Given the higher volume and more recent reviews, hub OS’s reputation is stronger and more current.
Edge: hub OS.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, which is typical for enterprise hotel solutions requiring custom quotes. Expect both to be priced based on hotel size, feature selection, and integration complexity.
Without transparent pricing, your evaluation should focus on value delivered relative to features, support, and existing hotel needs.
Not ideal if your focus is purely on guest mobile engagement or contactless concierge services.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs internal communication tools or maintenance management.
hub OS provides a comprehensive internal communication and maintenance platform, rated highly for ease of use, support, and operational impact. It excels in streamlining hotel workflows, making it ideal for properties with complex operational needs.
Zaplox offers a versatile, guest-focused mobile app that enhances contactless interactions, from check-in to room service. It is best suited for hotels aiming to boost guest safety and satisfaction through mobile technology.
If your hotel’s priority is internal operational efficiency, hub OS is the clear choice. If improving the guest experience with mobile solutions is your goal, Zaplox offers a broader feature set.
In conclusion, choosing hinges on whether your hotel needs to optimize staff workflows or elevate the guest mobile journey. Both products serve different core functions, but based on recent reviews and strong ratings, hub OS has a more established reputation.
According to HTR's product database, Hub OS Guest in Touch and Zaplox Premium Guest App share 2 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Keyless Entry | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Checkin | ||
| Notifications | ||
| Remote Checkin | ||
| Web-app | ||
| Whitelabel Capability |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Hub OS excels in facilitating communication across various hotel departments. Reviews highlight the ease of reporting issues and distributing tasks am... Hub OS excels in facilitating communication across various hotel departments. Reviews highlight the ease of reporting issues and distributing tasks among teams, leading to coordinated efforts and improved service delivery. This feature has greatly enhanced the overall operational flow.
Users appreciate Hub OS's ability to streamline maintenance operations. It provides quick reporting and resolution of faults, reducing downtime and op... Users appreciate Hub OS's ability to streamline maintenance operations. It provides quick reporting and resolution of faults, reducing downtime and operational inefficiencies. The software allows teams to track and communicate maintenance issues in real-time, leading to faster problem-solving.
While many users find Hub OS user-friendly and visually appealing, some have experienced issues with the interface, such as occasional crashes or dela... While many users find Hub OS user-friendly and visually appealing, some have experienced issues with the interface, such as occasional crashes or delays. Despite these hiccups, users still appreciate how the software simplifies complex tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
A recurring issue mentioned by users is the presence of technical glitches. These include synchronization delays, occasional crashes, and interface er... A recurring issue mentioned by users is the presence of technical glitches. These include synchronization delays, occasional crashes, and interface errors. While these issues are generally resolved quickly, they can still disrupt hotel operations.
Hub OS's mobile accessibility is commended for allowing hotel staff to manage operations on-the-go. This feature is especially useful for reporting is... Hub OS's mobile accessibility is commended for allowing hotel staff to manage operations on-the-go. This feature is especially useful for reporting issues and accessing important data quickly, thereby saving time and improving overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hub OS Guest in Touch and Zaplox Premium Guest App share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Hub OS Guest in Touch offers 23 verified integration partners, while Zaplox Premium Guest App offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hub OS Guest in Touch leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 3.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hub OS Guest in Touch: No. Zaplox Premium Guest App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. hub OS has an HT Score of 22 and Zaplox has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor